Could the world’s most pro-life court be in Germany?


By now, you’ve all heard this story:

Circumcising young boys on religious grounds amounts to grievous bodily harm, a German court ruled Tuesday in a landmark decision that the Jewish community said trampled on parents’ religious rights.

The regional court in Cologne, western Germany, ruled that the “fundamental right of the child to bodily integrity outweighed the fundamental rights of the parents”, a judgement [sic] that is expected to set a legal precedent.

Reaction has been mainly in the “government intrusion on parental and religious rights” variety. But maybe we should take a slightly different view. Maybe we should hope this court uses the same logic on other controversial “procedures.”

Maybe we should start referring to abortion as “full fetal circumcision.”

“The religious freedom of the parents and their right to educate their child would not be unacceptably compromised, if they were obliged to wait until the child could himself decide to be circumcised,” the court added.

Indeed, and perhaps we should also wait until “the child could himself decide to be aborted.” Seems only fair, doesn’t it? He’s the one most affected. If the simple act of having a foreskin removed is such an affront to the baby’s personal rights – his right to personhood – surely a court would extend that to the baby’s life.

(Posted by The TrogloPundit.)

Related Articles

Misc Commentary For July 18th

Misc Commentary For July 18th: A few things worth talking about that didn’t merit their own posts… — Here’s more

The DU Post Of The Day: Why Would I Stay In A Country With People Who Welcome Fascism?

There are lots of good reasons to vote for Bush in Nov. He’s serious about fighting terrorism and Kerry isn’t,

17

Sad: Univ. Of Mississippi Suggests Discretion When Using “Ole Miss” Nickname, Because RAAAAACISM

You have the freedom of speech, as long as the words you use are approved and found in the NEWSPEAK

comments

Share This

Share this post with your friends!