For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Do I have to care about David Letterman?
Written By : TrogloPundit

So David Letterman is a chronic adulterer whose failings made him a target for blackmail.

“Just imagine how this would play if it were Glenn Beck,” Glenn “Instapundit” Reynolds writes.

Yeah, good point. Not that major media haven’t covered it – it was the lead story on Yahoo for large portions of Thursday and Friday, for example – but…well, the AP headline: “Letterman creates brilliant hour of TV from woes.” That would never have been written if Rush Limbaugh had spent an hour of his show talking about his own adultery.

But, y’know, I just don’t want to make that argument. Is there outrage over Letterman’s adultery? Maybe, but I can’t muster any. I just don’t care.

David Letterman is a television personality. He’s done some acting, sure, probably does some writing. But mainly, he’s a guy on TV. That’s it.

That he had a few affairs…well, there is his eternal soul to worry about. From that perspective, I guess I ought to care.

And that some of the women (they were all women, right?) might have been under him – that is to say, subordinate. He might have been in a position…

…look, I’m trying to make a serious point, here, and you snickering like that isn’t helping.

If you have power over somebody else – if you can influence someone else’s career, for example – then hitting on that person, having a sexual relationship with that person, is completely inappropriate. That person might not think he or she (usually she) has the option of saying no.

It could be a form of sexual harrassment. At least, it was considered so. Once.

Of course, statutory rape and drug rape were once considered “rape-rape,” too. Once.

Is David Letterman kind of a hypocrite? Maybe. This is the guy, after all, who just couldn’t believe that Sarah Palin’s teenage daughter got pregnant. It was incredible to him. Galling. As R.S. McCain (who really ought to be writing about this, seeing as he didn’t get invited to the Defending the Dream Summit) put it: “you could, for example, understand why a habitual philanderer would be so hostile to the happily married mother of five, Sarah Palin.”

Will I take a little schadenfreude over Letterman’s admission? Probably, what with him being a Republican-hating Lefty, and me being an imperfect person. And it’ll lower my opinion of him. It would lower my opinion of anybody.

But, geez, do I have to be filled with righteous indignation? Or can I get back to the football game now?

That’s all I really want: to notice it, get a blog post out of it, say “what a creep,” and get back to my football game.

And now I have, so now I will.

(The TrogloPundit, a.k.a. Lance Burri, is busy prepping for the Wisconsin-Minnesota Paul Bunyan’s Axe game.)

0
  • SomeOtherSteve

    If you're a liberal, marrying your stepdaughter is fine. So, are they going to go after a liberal entertainer who was bumping uglies with all the female staffers like he's some kind of rock star? Yeah, right.

    I was watching Good Morning America Weekend edition this morning when they reported on the incident. Sponsors said they are sticking by Dave because his ratings are picking up. (I imagine that he's gaining old Leno market share.) It's all about the Benjamins, baby.

  • SomeOtherSteve

    Well, that link looked ugly, didn't it?

  • Jack Schite

    Just asking the question shows you care very much.

    Losers!

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    Since Liberals believe everyone should have sex with anyone or anything whenever the urge happens to strike with no consequences, the chance that Letterman will suffer any consequences from the Left is even smaller than the chance that Roman Polanski will.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Eventually, I hope Letterman will be replaced by TV's Craig Ferguson, a much funnier and more interesting, fresher host. He's pretty much a leftist too, but he's actually funny.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    Losers!

    Posted by Jack Shit

    2009-10-03 12:12:14

    You told us you were leaving. Miss us already? Did your blow-up Obama doll spring another leak?

  • Clint

    Essentially, this is a story about two scumbags. The difference is that one scumbag broke the law while the other was just a scumbag.

    Maybe my physics professors were wrong: likes apparently do attract each other.

  • Pingback: Over at Right Wing News today: « The TrogloPundit

  • tblrk2006

    Its really just sweet irony. I remember letterman laying into gov sanford on several occasions….im sure he did so to any and all repubs caught in sex scandals. Seems the chickens have come home to roost.

  • Pingback: eco card vista casinos

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info