Excerpt Of The Day: Even Liberals Don’t Think Much Of Hillary’s “Experience”
“…Hillary negotiated nothing and was present at no major meetings on foreign policy and national security after 1994. She reviewed some presidential speeches (including the one announcing the bombing of terrorist camps crafted in an awkward husband-and-wife session on Martha’s Vineyard just after President Clinton confessed to the Monica Lewinsky scandal in 1998), gave an important address at a Beijing conference on women and traveled to 80 countries as a good-will ambassador. But these contributions are more reminiscent of Eleanor Roosevelt than, say, Al Gore.
On domestic policy, Hillary was essentially sidelined after her disastrous 1994 health-care plan. The State Children’s Health Insurance Program she touts was actually something the Clinton administration stalled on until pressured by Ted Kennedy and Dodd, who also led the seven-year fight for the Family and Medical Leave Act. The Clinton crime bill that included 100,000 new cops was Biden’s legislation, and Bob Rubin, while now endorsing Hillary, grumbled about her judgment and never let her in on economic policy when he was Treasury secretary. Clinton was still the most influential First Lady in history, and she has a lot more familiarity with the upper reaches of government than Obama. But if her inevitability is destroyed in Iowa, her “experience” might not be much help.” — Liberal Johnathan Alter in Newsweek
Only in today’s political climate, where so much of the “civil rights movement” is comprised of bottom-feeding race hustlers and
Rachel Lucas wrote a post in response to my post about manly men. As always, she made eminently sensible points
This is not going to come as a suprise to many of you, but there are liberals out there who