For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Feminist Resistance
Written By : Donald Douglas

Just sharing something I found when writing my earlier post, “Sady Doyle Cheers Penis Amputation in Sweden!

Here’s a 1994 flashback from the New York Times, “Mrs. Bobbitt is Symbol of Feminist Resistance“:

To the Editor:

Like most of the American mass media, you have framed the Lorena L. Bobbitt affair as an issue of penile mutilation. You ignore the social context of Lorena Bobbitt’s actions.

Prof. Catharine MacKinnon of the University of Michigan and the writer Andrea Dworkin long ago pointed to the institution of marriage as a legal cover for the act of rape and the permanent humiliation of women. Lorena Bobbitt’s life has been a poignant instance of that nightmare, which elicited a bold and courageous act of feminist self-defense.

As one who recently returned from a conference of feminist activists in Europe, I can assure readers that the Lorena Bobbitt case has galvanized the women’s movement worldwide in a way the Anita Hill case never did. No feminist is advocating emasculation as the weapon of first choice. And some women question the political prudence of “sociosexual vigilantism.” But whatever the judgment of America’s patriarchal legal system, Lorena Bobbitt is for most feminists no criminal. She is instead a symbol of innovative resistance against gender oppression everywhere ….

STEPHANIE MORRIS

Sydney, Australia, Jan. 12, 1994

Hmm, feminist innovation.

Yeah. Sure.

0
  • Anonymous

    Andrea Dworkin – haven’t heard that name for some time, she still around? An entertaining woman.

    So much to cringe at in that block quote: social context of castration? Innovative resistance? feminist self defence? They don’t advocate weiner wacking as weapon of “first choice” but certainly don’t rule it out as a legitimate response.
    “sociosexual vigilantism.” How do they come up with this stuff?

  • Waterwillows

    There are today 130 MILLION women who are the victims of FGM. They have deliberately been turned into asexual wooden planks. Their purpose is to service the male as a semen toilet. And the world remains silent while this practise is carried out in many countries, including the west.
    Then we have one weiner wacking and it is front page news for months. I feel they must have got the idea from the guys. They just don’t get the publicity.

  • Spikey

    Sady Doyle and Stephanie Morris would both look really good in a burka.

  • Toastrider

    “Prof. Catharine MacKinnon of the University of Michigan and the writer Andrea Dworkin long ago pointed to the institution of marriage as a legal cover for the act of rape and the permanent humiliation of women.”

    *stares*

    What.

    No, seriously. That first sentence right there just dumbfounds me. There are good marriages and bad marriages but what the hell? How do these people function in society?

    Edit: I love the gormless twat who dropped a thumbs down on the story without having the chutzpah to comment on it.

    • Anonymous

      “How do these people function in society?”

      They don’t. That’s why, for their safety and ours, they are confined mental institutions cleverly disguised as Universities.

  • Waterwillows

    It seems to me that the leftist feminist organization has had little to say by way of intelligence for quite some time. Having no merit or credibility with intelligent women, they have resorted to ever worse ‘shock’ statements. I think it is done solely for the publicity that helps to give some validation to their pathetic lives and empty aims.
    There is much to be done in the world to improve justice and mercy towards women. But this vacuum of dead beats is not the vehicle to do it. Since they are unable to recognize this themselves, I will recognize it for them.

  • Anonymous

    Yet another reason to avoid dating feminists (as if any more were needed).

    Could you imagine the outrage if any male were to suggest amputation as in any way an acceptable punishment for a misbehaving wife (and it would be justified of course)?

    Lorena wasn’t rebelling against the patriarchy, she was pissed at her abusive husband.

    All radical feminists should be required by law to marry radical Islamic clerics. It can be sold to both as a way to force the other side to see reason and change their ways. They’d either even each other out or kill each other. End result: in one generation we’d be free of both.

  • Waterwillows

    UFKA_Smithwick,

    The Taliban just recently amputated both feet of a young woman for applying for a job to help out her family. There was not so much as a murmer from the brain dead feminists. It is the numerous outrages like this that take place while they look the other way, that has proven their ineptness and moral vacuum. Do not expect outrage from them. Expect it elsewhere.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Gingrich: Defeating Obama ‘Most Dangerous President in US History’ a ‘Duty Of National Security’

php developer india
Previous Features
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Advertisement
User Info