Government Agency Eliminates Employee Reviews Because They Can Be “Discriminatory”
I’ve heard of: previous employers refusing to comment on how a person performed while employed because they feared lawsuits, but this is a whole new level of business CYA:
One government agency has decided that the results of employee ratings are too discriminatory, and eliminated the process entirely. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced on Monday that it will now award all employees the highest rating regardless of performance reviews.
The CFPB, which oversees transactions in the financial sector for the federal government, decided to no longer conduct employee reviews because there were just too many apparent “significant disparities” between the races, ages, and locations of its employees.
You know what this means?
Bonuses. : Automatic merit raises.
There’s no legal reason to deny a person anything.
No business would do this. : It’s leftist nonsense.
Only government operates like this.
Hat Tip: : Weasel Zippers
Duane Lester is co-founder of All American Blogger, and the primary writer. Following graduation, Duane entered the United States Navy as a journalist. He spent five years touring the world, reporting on local news and sports. Following his enlistment, Duane spent almost 10 years working with adjudicated youth in residential treatment environments. Duane discovered politics after September 11. He credits Erich "Mancow" Muller for opening his eyes to his conservative beliefs. Since then, Duane has devoured books and literature on politics, reading everything he can from Adam Smith to Larry Elder to Thomas Sowell. He refers to his style of politics as "conserva-tarian", a mixture of conservative and libertarian beliefs.
Iowa (Jan 3, 2008): Huckabee seems to have pulled just ahead of Romney for first place here. At the moment,
And German pork-eaters, at that. Otherwise, here at home, we’d be having yet another wave of progressive head explosions. Via
Because this is an important issue, I want to spend a little more time elaborating on what’s wrong with Bush’s