If Sarah Palin could pick stocks like she picks candidates…


…or, hell, maybe she can.

Ed Morrissey:

Despite media claims that the Tea Party has gone dormant and that Sarah Palin’s influence has waned, the candidates she backs for office have an uncanny knack for winning their elections

Of the nine candidates Palin’s endorsed this year, according to the story, five have already faced the voters, and all five have won. And these aren’t just contribution-rich frontrunner, either: candidates like Ted Cruz (TX) and Richard Mourdock (IN) were big underdogs, and then Palin endorsed them, and then they won significantly large victories.

That’s not necessarily causation, but it certainly is becoming a trend.


None of this undermines what I said earlier this week
: Dick Cheney was right. In 2008, nobody knew Palin would become the conservative darling and champion she is today. Nobody knew Palin could become that. In 2008, Palin was a bad pick.

But if McCain hadn’t made that bad pick in 2008, Would Palin have become what she is today? Probably not. So. With that hindsight, I guess: good pick, John.

(Posted by The TrogloPundit.)

Trending Today

Related Articles

A Mini-Interview With Dr. Helen Smith On Why Kids Kill

Dr. Helen Smith is a forensic psychologist who has written “Scarred Hearts: Understanding and Identifying Kids who kill.” She’s also

More Photo-Hijinks In Lebanon

Last week, when Reuters photographer Adnan Hajj got busted posting photoshopped pics as if they were real, I speculated that

8

Attention, Parents of Very Small Children

Up to a certain age it is normal and expected for your offspring to fail to distinguish between minor irritants,