Metrosexuality: The New Masculinity?

Metrosexuality: The New Masculinity?

Metrosexuality: The New Masculinity?

by Scott, Guest Blogger

Metrosexal

Not content in changing our traditional way of life and subverting our institutions such as government, religion, education systems and the media, Cultural Marxists have begun to challenge the mere concept of who we are, seeking to redefine gender and gender roles in their quest to create a society which is genderless and androgynous, where men and women are defined only by their sex.
Not to be confused with gender equality, the quest for a genderless society has led to the femininisation of males, a crisis in masculinity, where men are not only uncertain in exerting traditional gender attributes and characteristics such as strength, achievement and competitiveness, but are actively rejecting the way of life of their ancestors, embracing a Cultural Marxist phenomenon known as metrosexuality.
Espousers of metrosexuality, metrosexuals are usually typified as being young, affluent men who take excessive pride in their physical appearance, ranging from grooming habits (where they deem the hairless look of a pre-pubescent boy more manly and desirable than the normal look of grown men) to pride in fashion, wearing clothes and colours less commonly associated with men. Other attributes associated with metrosexuality include an interest in culture and the arts, and liberal attitudes to, amongst other things, marriage, abortion and sexual habits, where women are treated merely as sexual objects, to be objectified, used and coveted as mere property and conquests.You only have to take a look through various media outlets such as magazines, television, cinema and the music industry to see the agenda of Cultural Marxists and liberals that somehow, metrosexuality is now the ultimate expression of masculinity, which itself can only be defined as something expressed through physical appearance or sexual habits.This is, of course, not only damaging to young men and society as a whole, but a totally absurd assumption and a wholly wrong definition of masculinity, as past men throughout history show. Strong, rugged, unapologetic in his support for gun sports and hunting, and a proud rancher, former President Theodore Roosevelt was a true “man’s man”, unflinching in his bravery and expression of the physical characteristics commonly associated with masculinity and manliness.: His speech “The Strenuous Life” remains a great guidebook of manliness and masculinity to many Americans. In his lifetime, Roosevelt was celebrated for his masculinity, lauded by his peers for these aforementioned attributes.: Roosevelt remains, almost a century since his death, the epitome of masculinity and manliness.: An antithesis to metrosexuality, men like Roosevelt are often criticised for being out of touch, uncultured, unstylish, misogynist, violence-loving, gun-touting maniacs, devoid of any relevant relationship with modern society and culturenot quite recognising this new androgyny in society.Both epitomes of masculinity described here are despised by liberals and Cultural Marxists, as all the values described previously reject an expression of masculinity being exclusive to men. Cultural Marxists despise strong, individual men committed to family, careers and God, as they cannot subvert them or seduce them with androgyny. Traditional masculine activities such as gun sports and hunting are frowned upon not only from the liberal obsession of gun control viewpoint but also because they promote the feelings of competition, status and desires to win and be the best, all rejected in the “everyone gets a medal, there are no winners” culture promoted by Cultural Marxists. Masculine men of Roosevelt and Macmillan’s ilk are the last stand against Cultural Marxism, which seeks to destroy the very concept of manliness, by fighting to preserve the very same traditional values and morals that have made nations such as the US great in the past.: 

Like all agencies of Cultural Marxism and liberalism, metrosexuality must be defeated to save societies and culture across the nations of the Western World. The fight must come from young people who believe, like me, that a real man and a real embodiment of 21st century masculinity is not a metrosexual, but a man who is confident in all aspects of his being (from his physical appearance through to his personality, character and choices) without excessive, obsessive and repressive management of beauty techniques, who promotes traditional values such as the sanctity of marriage and the preciousness of an unborn baby (rejecting the grotesque bro-choice movement), who engages in the traditional leisure activities of men such as gun sports, hunting, sports and other physical activities and who treat all people, but most of all women, with the utmost respect at all times, empowering them to strive, to achieve and to aspire. For me, it is these values, the values of Roosevelt and Macmillan, that we must fight for and protect whilst condemning metrosexuality to the dustbin of history, a sad chapter in Western, male society and culture.

This article was originally published on Counter Cultured’s “Gentleman’s Corner” column.

Leave a Comment

Permalinks


Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!

Send this to a friend