Obama-Appointed Judge Rules that U.S. Border Fence is Racist

You know liberals are really grasping at straws when they pull this crap. An Obama-appointed judge claims that the border fence has a “disparate impact” on “minority communities.”

Border Patrol In Montana

Since when are illegal immigrants residing in foreign countries an American “community,” let alone an oppressed community?

A Homeland Security initiative to put fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border could discriminate against minorities, according to an Obama-appointed federal judge who’s ruled that the congressionally-approved project may have a “disparate impact on lower-income minority communities.”
This of course means that protecting the porous–and increasingly violent–southern border is politically incorrect. At least that’s what the public college professor at the center of the case is working to prove and this month she got help from a sympathetic federal judge. Denise Gilman, a clinical professor at the taxpayer-funded University of Texas-Austin, is researching the “human rights impact” of erecting a barrier to protect the U.S. from terrorists, illegal immigrants, drug traffickers and other serious threats.

This is madness. I’m calling it right now: within five years, there will be some sort of affirmative-action scheme for border jumpers.

Also see: 7 Things Liberals Really Mean When They Cry Racism

Related Articles

Time For The First Military Tribunal

Time For The First Military Tribunal: Remember this ugly face? When last we heard from Ramzi Binalshibh, he was claiming

The Flight 93 Conspiracy

The Flight 93 Conspiracy: Like most tragic events of recent times, a myriad of conspiracy theories have sprung up about

W. And The Upside-Down Book

W. And The Upside-Down Book: I received an email today from RWN reader Doug Weinberg commenting on the doctored photo


Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!