Obama-Appointed Judge Rules that U.S. Border Fence is Racist


You know liberals are really grasping at straws when they pull this crap. An Obama-appointed judge claims that the border fence has a “disparate impact” on “minority communities.”

Border Patrol In Montana

Since when are illegal immigrants residing in foreign countries an American “community,” let alone an oppressed community?

A Homeland Security initiative to put fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border could discriminate against minorities, according to an Obama-appointed federal judge who’s ruled that the congressionally-approved project may have a “disparate impact on lower-income minority communities.”
This of course means that protecting the porous–and increasingly violent–southern border is politically incorrect. At least that’s what the public college professor at the center of the case is working to prove and this month she got help from a sympathetic federal judge. Denise Gilman, a clinical professor at the taxpayer-funded University of Texas-Austin, is researching the “human rights impact” of erecting a barrier to protect the U.S. from terrorists, illegal immigrants, drug traffickers and other serious threats.

This is madness. I’m calling it right now: within five years, there will be some sort of affirmative-action scheme for border jumpers.

Also see: 7 Things Liberals Really Mean When They Cry Racism

Trending Today

Related Articles

There’s A Quagmire In Iraq All Right…

Liberals, who always seem anxious to relive the “glory days” of the Vietnam anti-war movement, have frequently exclaimed that Iraq

Truman’s State Of The Union

Truman’s State Of The Union Address On April 16, 1945: When Harry Truman became President of the United States, it

Nancy Pelosi’s Energy Policy

I sometimes wonder (in fact I often wonder) about the real mental acuity of the Speaker of the House. She