Obama’s Ground Zero Backpedaling Fail

by Donald Douglas | August 15, 2010 11:15 am

Byron York calls Obama’s Ground Zero statements “Clintonian[1]“:

… there is simply no doubt that Obama’s Friday evening speech, in the context in which it was delivered, was an endorsement of the Ground Zero project. It was certainly widely understood as such. The headlines of the three New York papers reporting the speech were: “Obama Backs Islam Center Near 9/11 Site” (New York Times); “Allah Right By Me” (New York Post); and “Prez: Build the Mosque” (New York Daily News). The lead of an Associated Press report on the speech was: “President Barack Obama on Friday forcefully endorsed building a mosque near ground zero, saying the country’s founding principles demanded no less.” But on Saturday, Obama said all those listeners were wrong, that they misunderstood him.

Several years ago, there was a word for Obama’s rhetorical technique: Clintonian. Like the former president, Obama spoke words he knew would be understood as having a particular meaning in a particular context. He also knew that those same words, when examined closely outside that context, might also be interpreted as having a different meaning. In that sense, the mosque affair is a good lesson for both supporters and opponents of the president. From now on, with Obama, as it was with Clinton, the rule is: Don’t listen to the speech. Read the words very carefully.

And Tom Maguire, “Obama On The Mosque – The Backpedaling Begins[2]“:

I have an idea our President will love – maybe we can open an Islamic Waffle House in a building damaged in the 9/11 attacks. Obama can be the first customer.

Hat Tip: Glenn Reynolds[3].

RELATED: Nice Deb, “Obama “Forcefully Endorses” Ground Zero Mosque[4].”

Cross-posted from American Power[5].