Pakistani Islamic Party Opposes Domestic Violence Ban Because It Would “Westernize” Society

by Duane Lester | March 31, 2014 10:22 pm

Behold, the real War on Women:[1]

r-PAKISTAN-GUNMEN-KARACHI-large570-550x229[2]

Women rights activists and female members of the provincial assembly from a religio-political party seemed to be at odds over the definition of domestic violence during a consultation in the capital city on Friday on lacunae in a bill tabled in the last House on the subject.

“Isn’t it breaking up a family if husband goes to jail for beating up wife,” said veiled woman legislator from Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl Fauzia Bibi justifying domestic violence by giving different cultural and religious perspectives.

She ended up saying the passage of the bill would westernise the society.

It seems nothing has ‘changed’ as just like the legislature of the previous PPP-ANP coalition provincial government, some members of the current provincial assembly still seem opposed to the Domestic Violence Bill: calling it a western agenda and interference in privacy of homes.: PPP woman legislator Noor Sehar had an anti-domestic violence bill in the previous assembly but it remained pending during the five-year term of the last government.

The current draft, circulated among the participant, seems an improved version of the previous bills. “It defines domestic violence as all acts of gender based or other physical or psychological abuse committed by an accused against women, children or any other vulnerable person with whom the accused is or has been in a domestic relationship…,” Uzma Mehboob, a legal consultant and rights’ activist, told the participants at a gathering of MPAs, women rights activists and journalists.

The event was organised jointly by Shirkat Gah and Provincial Commission on the Status of Women to discuss how loopholes could be removed and more members of the provincial assembly Women activists, religious parties differ on domestic violence could be consulted on it.

“Some oppose the bill in the previous assembly saying it would westernise the society and promote divorce, while others called it intrusion in privacy of home,” said Uzma Mehboob.

What do you say to this? : I mean, really?

You can’t really be surprised though, can you?

Hat Tip: : Weasel Zippers[3]

See also: : Senator says administration ‘cooking the books’ on Obamacare numbers, there is no fix

Endnotes:
  1. War on Women:: http://www.dawn.com/news/1096299/women-activists-religious-parties-differ-on-domestic-violence
  2. [Image]: https://rightwingnews1.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/r-PAKISTAN-GUNMEN-KARACHI-large570-550x229.jpg
  3. Weasel Zippers: http://weaselzippers.us/181140-pakistani-islamic-party-opposes-domestic-violence-ban-because-it-would-westernize-society/

Source URL: https://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/pakistani-islamic-party-opposes-domestic-violence-ban-because-it-would-westernize-society/