For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
San Francisco Booksellers Won’t Carry Going Rogue
Written By : Donald Douglas

You know someone’s packing some REALLY powerful intellect when every other post on their blog is a Jon Stewart video. Perhaps it’s generational change, where we see a lazy kind of media-induced resistance to hard thinking and analytical reasoning, but it’s out there, and not just among hardline netroots denizens. I’m tempted to try to place the willfully ignorant in a corner with those cohorts political scientists identify as post-engagement voters or actualized citizens who channel their political activity through increasingly creative and expressive action rather than the more historically hierarchical, yet socially affirming, mobilizations. But it’s more likely that radical leftwing ideology — with its inherent intolerance of differening opinions and hostility to the vigorous play of ideas — is the real culprit.

In any case, my thinking here is being driven by the non-shocker of an article at the San Francisco Chronicle, “Bay Area Not Maverick Enough to Read Palin Book“:


It might as well have cooties. Hardly anyone wants to touch the thing, or even get close to it.

The new autobiography by moose hunter and failed vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin is harder to find in the Bay Area than a hockey mom. Some bookstores figure it’s one of those grit-your-teeth First Amendment deals that principled booksellers must put up with from time to time.

But many nonchain bookstores won’t handle it.

“Our customers are thinking people,” said Nathan Embretson, a bookseller at Pendragon Books in Oakland. “They’re not into reading drivel.”

There’s not a single copy on the shelf. Embretson said no one has asked for it except for one guy, who was kidding.

“He said he wanted to look at it but he also said he didn’t really want to read it,” Embretson said. “Anyway, he certainly didn’t want to buy it. I think he regarded looking at it as a kind of punishment.”

There are no copies of the book at Cover to Cover Booksellers in Noe Valley, either.

“Anything like that we wouldn’t carry,” said clerk Emily Stackhouse. “We’re a small store and it would probably gross us all out. Some things you carry because of freedom of speech, but a book like that is just gross.”

One customer did put in a special request for the book one evening but, perhaps thinking better in the light of day, failed to show up and actually pay money for it, Stackhouse said.

Sheryl Cotleur, the head buyer for Book Passage, which operates stores in Corte Madera and San Francisco, said the two stores have sold exactly two copies of the book. That works out to one copy per store. Cotleur said two other people have asked to look at the book but no one else has asked to buy it.

“Nobody around here is particularly interested in her politics or her opinions,” she said. “There’s a certain curiosity, sure. But I don’t think that translates into what people are willing to pay money for.”

Now this is not simply a generational thing. Mostly, it’s a urban secular-collectivist thing. What’s so fascinating, is that when people say they’re uninterested in reading about Sarah Palin’s life they’re really saying that they’re hostile to heartland American values, respect for nature, hard work, and individual initiative, and especially the notion of a life of personal responsibility rather than socialistic paternalism.

As I noted last night, reading Palin’s book is taking me back to my own upbringing, and it’s making me realize how all-American is the Sarah Palin experience — and by extension, how historically-rejectionist are those who excoriate her as a backwoods yokel. Palin’s family roots are actually in Southern California, and then Idaho. From there her father decided to pick up stakes for the lush wilderness of Alaska. I know if it would’ve been me and my family — especially my uncle — I would’ve taken right to the rugged life of hunting and fishing and cold nestled-in winters. In Southern California in the 1970s, I spent a lot of time engaged in outdoor activities (including cycling, motorcross, fourwheeling, and shooting). Indeed, most of the action sports popular today (skateboarding and snowboarding, etc.), were acitivities that were pioneered by some of my closest buddies at the time. There was an entreprenuerial work ethic about life, whether that be with extreme-sports, business professionalism, or working as a farm-hand at ranches out by Lake Elsinore.

When Sarah Palin writes of how her future husband Todd Palin earned all his own money as a fisherman and an oil-roughneck, enough to buy his own cars and trucks as a teenager, that’s just the kind of inititative that’d be expected in my family when growing up. Perhaps identifying with that kind of lifestyle really is what separates radical leftists from people who are, basically, just really normal folks more so than “conservatives.” As my good friend Lynn Mitchell noted last night:


Shooting a gun? Camping with bears? Hiking the wilderness? Those are so foreign to many folks … but for me it was a freedom-loving childhood just as Donald describes growing up in California, and Sarah Palin describes growing up as part of the Alaskan experience.

And with that clearly comes a greater openness to different values and political ideas than you’ll find among the haughty radical hypocrites of the contemporary youth cohort.

It’s a shame, really. But folks do wise up with age, and I’ve been encouraged by how many traditional students I’ve worked with this semester. No doubt Barack Obama’s going to be one term president, and in fact, he’s acknowledged the likelihood of that outcome. See, “Obama Tells CNN – He May Not Run in 2012.”

See also, Hot Air, “Surprise: Many San Francisco Booksellers Refusing to Carry Palin’s Book; Update: Palin Apologizes to Those Whose Books Weren’t Signed.” Plus Memeorandum.

Cross-posted from American Power.

0
  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Their loss of revenue. I guess they’ll make up for it in sales of Mao’s little red book, Mein Kampf, and the Marx-Engels Reader.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    I’m shocked. Simply shocked.

  • boatman47

    Read this post carefully. Every virtue Mr Douglas attributes to Palin’s book comes from someting he reads into her life experience, not from the book itself. That experience differs dramatically from the life experience of many of those who live in and around San Francisco. Which illustrates Palin’s central problem as a politician – neither her life nor what she thinks connect with the lives or thoughts of huge numbers of voters.

    Her book was an oportunity or Palin to start dealing with that problem – to start connecting to voters. Unhappily, the book really is drivel – there is nothing new, nothing interesting, and certainly nothing that will advance Palin’s political career. She spends an entire book ‘preaching to the choir’ – and not even preaching very well. Sarah Palin is a very limited person – a political fad – a lightweight – and her book proves it.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    I’m glad you bought and read the book to make this declaration, boatman, its good of you to carefully study the facts and know of what you speak before pontificating in this manner. To do otherwise would be simply the pathetic bleatings of a bitter, frightened wretch, wouldn’t it?

  • Palin_will_lose

    Could it be they just don’t carry Fiction books.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Yeah, few book stores carry fiction. It’s just not a profitable sector of the market at all. Its hard to even find fiction, what with the book stores all not bothering to sell any.

    Well, they do have Al Gore’s and Barak Obama’s books in stock, I guess.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Read this post carefully.

    You mean your post? Sorry, but we can’t. Because we don’t care what you think.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Posted by boatman47
    2009-11-21 11:06:39

    Oh look another scared liberal, telling conservatives how to think.

  • rmiller

    Could be they know their market….NYC bookstores aren’t stocking too many of her books either.

    If the books won’t sell in your bookstore…why stock them?

  • rmiller

    You know someone’s packing some REALLY powerful intellect when every other post on their blog is a Jon Stewart video.
    Donald Douglas | 8:26 pm | Permalink

    Actually, Mr. Stewart is pretty smart, and damn funny. There’s a reason why the conservative media pay attention to him.

  • Tennwriter

    Boatman,
    Her life differs from a fringe of a fringe. I wonder just how many San Franciscans are San Franciscans as you understand the term. Probably the majority are not.

    Sure that fringe has some power, its probably filled up with activists and political sorts like you and me, and those more influential. But its just a small subset of a single US town.

    I remember the Left saying to W that he had to convince them that attacking Iraq was a good idea. They were open to it, maybe, but he had not made the case, they claimed. It was a classic Lucy jerks the football moment.

    Certain people, a fringe of a fringe, are simply not going to agree with Palin. It would not matter what she did or how well she did it.

    These people are useful. Every politician needs jerks to kick around. There’s people who think Communism wasn’t adequately disproven by 200 million bodies and eleven tries. There’s people who think Reagan was not one of the greatest presidents of the Twencen. There’s people who think Castro is a good guy. And there’s people who are proud of being ignorant of practically everything as they live in their little nodule on the edge of the Third Millenium in a somewhat important town on the edge of the American continent. And when someone comes to them, and says “Hey, why don’t you broaden your horizon a tiny bit, they say ‘no thanks’”

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    There’s a reason why the conservative media pay attention to him

    And that reason is that he’s a leftist crank who wants simultaneously to be taken seriously as a great thinker and analyst while not being taken seriously because he’s a comedian. Looking at the camera and raising an eyebrow while a sycophantic audience laughs is not funny or intelligent.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Debbie Spend-it-now is selling America’s future to the Chinese

php developer india
Previous Features

Ads

Five Ways Conservatives Will Have to Sell Their Souls if Romney Wins
An Interview With Ron Paul
The RWN Real-Estate Sale
RWN\'s Favorite Tony Robbins Quotes
Stop Apologizing for Being an American
The Amway Experience
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Advertisement
User Info