Even IPCC Is Backing Off From Debunked Global Warming Hoax

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been a prime driver of the global warming hoax, even stooping so low as to win a Nobel Peace Prize for its shrill and pernicious propaganda. But now the IPCC admits that the jig is up. A leaked draft of its report AR5 confesses that it is the sun that makes the earth warm, not SUVs or affordable light bulbs. Via Watts Up With That:

The admission of strong evidence for enhanced solar forcing changes everything. The climate alarmists can’t continue to claim that warming was almost entirely due to human activity over a period when solar warming effects, now acknowledged to be important, were at a maximum. The final draft of AR5 WG1 is not scheduled to be released for another year but the public needs to know now how the main premises and conclusions of the IPCC story line have been undercut by the IPCC itself.

The report also admits that despite all the hysterical lies “journalists” shriek in the mainstream media, the warming predicted by IPCC models has not occurred.

However, due to the state of abject ignorance in which the media keeps the American public, these revelations are unlikely to stop Obama and his crony capitalist pals from inflicting economically crippling carbon taxes in the name of a “crisis” now admitted to be a fiction.

baghdad-bob-global-warming
The mainstream media would still have us believe.

On tips from Artfldgr and Bob Roberts. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

Also see...

Related Articles

0

Obama: “The Politics Of Hotcoldwetdry Are Tough!!!!!”

FacebookTwitterEmail Well, yes, they are, because most people, even those who are Warmists, aren’t interested in burdensome restrictions on their

6

Sunday’s NYC Climate March Is Like Totally Anti-Establishment

FacebookTwitterEmail Evan, dare Politico say, TEA Party like! Anyhow, an alternated headline could be “what if there was a climate

1

Jon Stewart Knows The Best Way To Turn Skeptics Into Climate Change Alarmists

FacebookTwitterEmail Does it involve providing actual scientific evidence rather than hysterical talking points and failed computer models? Of course not

Share This

Share this post with your friends!