I just don't get this. Ruch has been on the airwaves for over twenty years. If he said the things they claim he has, where are the sound bites? Yet, we have people all over the Whitehouse caught on film singing the praises of Mao, Castro, & Chavez and the media won't even look at actual evidence. What has happened to the media in America where they would rather believe fake facts then look at actual evidence? Does their idology mean that much more to them than their morals?

I've been listing to Rush on and off for over twenty years, and I've never heard him make "a racist statement".

In today's world, a racist statement can be anything a lib in power doesn't agree with.

Does their idology mean that much more to them than their morals?

Posted by BIG

2009-10-15 19:12:39

True Believers need a rigid ideology to compensate for lacking a consciousness that can grasp morals.

Sort of the way a prosthetic limb covers an amputee's stump.

Well, according to D-Vega, Limbaugh saying the media wanted Donovan McNabb to succeed because he's black is a racist statement… somehow.