For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Good News! Al Qaeda Leader Anwar Al-Awlaki Reported Killed, Realizes Only Male Virgins Left In Paradise
Written By : William Teach

The good news tag is not meant to be it’s usual sarcasm

(CBS News) Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S.-born radical Islamic preacher who rose to the highest level of al Qaeda’s franchise in Yemen, has been killed.

Al-Awlaki, born in New Mexico, has been linked to al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula’s (AQAP) attempted bombing of a U.S. passenger jet over Detroit on Christmas day, 2009, and was thought to be a leader of the group.

A U.S. government official confirms to CBS News senior security correspondent David Martin that al-Awlaki was killed. Yemen’s Defense Ministry was first to tell CBS News of the strike, but given previous reports which turned out to be erroneous, the relatively rapid U.S. confirmation is crucial, and bolsters witness accounts that it was a U.S. drone strike that killed the al Qaeda figure.

The Associated Press reported that an unidentified source said the U.S. believes al-Awlaki was killed in a strike by U.S. jets and drones on his convoy.

That is excellent news, and, for a change, we do need to give Mr. Obama some credit for continuing to escalate the global war on Islamic terrorism, er, Operation Overseas Contingency, and going after terrorists in nations across the Eastern hemisphere. I think Obama enjoys seeing bombs dropped.

Of course, this brings out the unhinged liberals

  • Guy from New Mexico Executed Without Trial Just sayin’
  • Extra judicial killing of a United States Citizen.
  • They finally did it If he was killed by the Yemini forces as this report says, those forces were probably either led or directed by the U.S. No trial, no evidence need be presented to execute an American because the Obama administration decreed that he was guilty.

And here’s Glenn Greenwald

The due-process-free assassination of U.S. citizens is now reality

After several unsuccessful efforts to assassinate its own citizen, the U.S. succeeded today (and it was the U.S.). It almost certainly was able to find and kill Awlaki with the help of its long-time close friend President Saleh, who took a little time off from murdering his own citizens to help the U.S. murder its. The U.S. thus transformed someone who was, at best, a marginal figure into a martyr, and again showed its true face to the world. The government and media search for The Next bin Laden has undoubtedly already commenced.

Interestingly, a stroll through the left-o-sphere finds virtually no mention of this news. Even Excitable Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs, who made his chops discussing Islamic terrorism, ignores the story. I guess the far left is trying to figure out how to spin this as an Obama and liberal win after so much wailing, hand wringing, and teeth gnashing over Obama’s kill order on al-Awlaki.

More: Oh, my, the loon-atic left is out in force

What we’ve witnessed with Awlaki’s death is the first official assassination based on a citizen practicing his First Amendment rights.

Got that? Preaching violence against US citizens, calling for Jihad, advocating the destruction of the US, and involvement with terrorist activities is now “practicing his 1st Amendment Rights.”

And more: Via The Jawa Report, the strike also got Samir Khan, another home grown Islamist wackjob (or, should that now be, wackedjob?)

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach. Please sign the drill now petition.

8
  • Anonymous

    Great news. Every dent we make into their leadership hurts their cause. 

  • Pingback: Bariatric surgery numbers up

  • JoeBrit

    Charles Johnson, LGF proprietor who is antiIslam, antiArab, and AntiPalestinian (Likud ass kisser from way back), is the far left?

    • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

      Yes he is based on the rest of his policy views.

    • Anonymous

      Yeah I know it’s hard to believe that there are leftists who don’t yearn for the return of the greater caliphate but it’s true, there are a couple.  

  • Martin Hale

    Good news, indeed, but Al-Qaeda is probably less of a worry in today’s environment than some of the groups operating in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  Especially since some of them have ties to the ISI, who ultimately might be able to provide them with atomics.  It’s not that Al-Qaeda isn’t still dangerous – they are.  It’s that the terrorist landscape has grown ever-more littered with splinter groups and cells.

    • http://www.thepiratescove.us/ William_Teach

      True. But, the most worrisome is the Islamists who aren’t terrorists, those that simply want to spread their hardcore version of Islam using the very trappings of Western civilization, and cow everyone who opposes it by calling them nuts and Islamaphobes. Consider: when that wackjob pastor wanted to burn a Koran, the world freaked. Iran is about to execute a Christian who converted from Islam for apostasy, yet, we barely hear a peep of protest.

  • Pingback: Good News! Al Qaeda Leader Anwar Al-Awlaki Reported Killed … | ENA news

  • Anonymous

    That will be a nice consolation prize when a few months from now terrorists shut down US air travel by knocking down an airliner a day with some of those 20,000 SAMs that vanished from Libya.

    Thanks Sarkozy, Berlusconi, and Obama!

  • Anonymous

    That will be a nice consolation prize when a few months from now terrorists shut down US air travel by knocking down an airliner a day with some of those 20,000 SAMs that vanished from Libya.

    Thanks Sarkozy, Berlusconi, and Obama!

  • Pingback: Good News! Al Qaeda Leader Anwar Al-Awlaki Reported Killed … : GEA News

  • Anonymous

    Oh good, I was worried that the left wouldn’t come out to condemn this guy’s death.  

    Granted they aren’t as vocal as they would be had Bush been in charge, but it’s something.

    /Funny how every single one we kill is a “martyr” that will turn all of Islam against us.  And yet the more we kill the weaker they get.  

  • http://www.vega.com Vega – Proud Liberal from NYC

    This killing is not different than the outlaws that were wanted dead or alive, or a hostage taker who is sniped by police.

    It’s not something that should be done willy-nilly, but this is a special case.

    • Ranz

      You’re describing purely law enforcement operations and them reacting to people in violent scenarios.
      The story is about the executive branch putting out a hit on a US citizen. Something that’s specifically outlawed in the US constitution.
      A document a lot of conservatives pretend they care about deeply.

  • Creff

    Glenn Greenwald’s argument is that in doing this, Obama violates the constituion in order to act like a King and kill US citizens without trial.

    How could anyone here have a problem with this? Because he killed the 1 guy that would apply to who was a jihadi? Ok, well now there’s zero.

    Want a reminder who the FBI considers the greatest domestic terrorist threat to the US? There you go.

    At least we wont have to hear all the whinging when #2 happens, because of your reaction to Glenn Greenwald saying today the same thing he’s said every week for several years.

    • Toastrider

      Creff has a point.

      While I’m personally happy that Awlaki is now roasting in Hell, the precedent set is a little worrisome.

      As Creff mentioned, the current administration also regards the Tea Party as ‘domestic terrorists’.

      • Martin Hale

        Toasty – I wouldn’t worry too much about that precedent issue – this is a very narrowly defined precedent involving very specific circumstances.  Al-Awaki was an American expat who’d joined a non-national foreign combatant group during a time of war and was actively engaged in planning and executing operations against the US.  From a precedent perspective, that’s hardly going to be used as the justification to bump off someone who’s a nuisance domestically but who isn’t a member of a non-national combatant group and when it’s done outside of a time of war with that group.

        I hear your concerns for the Constitutionality, but for me, that just doesn’t rise to the level of overshadowing the benefit of making Mr. al-Awaki worm food.  And besides, I’d be willing to bet that American presidents have been quietly ordering targeted killings of key enemies during almost every time of war.  It’s sorta the nature of the beast.

        I asked someone else this, so I’ll ask you – would it have a more righteous kill in your mind had al-Awaki been killed during a military raid on an Al-Qaeda stronghold?  Maybe we knew his general whereabouts, but weren’t sure he was there.  Ostensibly killing him was a merely a serendipitous happy accident.  Would you prefer that our military operate that way?

        But here’s another interesting question for you: There was another man reportedly killed in the same attack who was a Saudi-born Pakistani who’d become a naturalised American citizen.  Where is the big uproar about his death?  So far, I’m not hearing any.  He was a know Al-Qaida operative, we likely knew he was there too.  If the Constitutional principle is the deliberate targeting of an American citizen, then shouldn’t the outrage be as vehement regarding his death – I mean what with that Important Principle at stake and all.

        • Creff

          In complete agreement with your portrayal of him and your argument. The problem is, this is meaningless.

          You can have your own opinion about it after the fact. But the govt’s opinion was the only one that mattered here. If theyre able to make a determination that a US citizen needs to be
          whacked based on an assessment rather than a trial, arguments are
          specifically what they’re avoiding.

          So it’s not a question of did they get it 100pc right for him, it’s a question of do you trust them to be unquestionable executioner for future targets, when the crimes of those future targets are what the people have said.

          I think his role in AQAP is pretty well solid. The problem is, we have the same discussion after every domestic terrorism incident about whether particular media personalities influenced or persuaded the killer, in doing what the constitution grants them the unquestionable protection to do. And that comes to nothing because it *is* nothing unless evidence is presented and then scrutinized via trial to determine otherwise.

          Unless you turn the POTUS into a king.

          • Martin Hale

            Creff – What I said above is not just my opinion – it’s the opinion of the US government and dozens, if not hundreds, of lawyers.  All of those people who’re trying to make the case that the al-Awlaki case is somehow a precedent-setting expansion of government powers is either ignorant enough to not understand that the whole affair has been framed within the context of happening during a time of war, or is willfully ignoring that fact.

            Simply stated, the legal rules for what can and cannot be done during a time of war are different than during peacetime when normal civilian rules of law apply.  Al-Awlaki’s citizenship is neither here nor there in the matter – he was a known operational leader with a group with whom the US government has been at war for nearly ten years.  That makes him an enemy combatant plain and simple – where he was born just doesn’t matter.  When someone attacks you on the street with a knife, you don’t worry about whether he’s an American or foreign national, you deal with the immediate threat.  Common sense.

            Let me illustrate the principle at play here with an historical example:

            The legal basis for the Civil War was that the US government considered the Constitution to be a legally binding contract, and that the Southern states had no legal standing to unilaterally dissolve it.  Therefore, the North simply didn’t recognise the South as a separate nation and they proceeded to attempt to clear the “rebels” off their (meaning the US government’s) land.  This, of course meant they didn’t recognise the people of the South as being anything but Americans.  Therefore, in a very real sense, every Southerner killed by Northern forces during the Civil War was an American citizen “targeted” by agents of our government.  So the precedent has been around and on the books for 150 years.  But it really only applies to events during a time of war.

            If you’d like to read a good summation of the legal basis for the al-Awlaki killing may I refer you to:

            http://opiniojuris.org/2011/09/30/anwar-al-aulaqi-killed-in-drone-strike-in-yemen/

            Mr. Anderson is a respected law professor and has participated in an number of high level legal policy formulations.  His analysis of the citizenship issue is about halfway down the page.  Felix littera!

            Let me say as a disclaimer that though I hold an earned JD, I am not registered with the bar in any state and my area of concentration in law school was employment law. 

  • X234

    Yes kill more people that believe in vengeance and then wonder why they attack back and say they attacked us for out freedoms. BRILLIANT I guess US confuse blowback with blowjobs.

    Well thats proof enough that the US is not a christian nation and even priests agree to that in how US acts.

  • X234

    Their will be another to take his place so the US wants a genocide. Despite assassinations and genocide is against intentional law.

    But only the weak follow the law and the few have special privileges.

    • Toastrider

      Troll harder.

  • http://www.facebook.com/granola.john John Riley

    Another win for Pres. Obama, its got to be hard for you guys to continue to hate him when hes getting all the terrorists that Bush couldnt get. O no wait this is all thanks to Bush according to Faux News, and the economy has nothing to do with Bush and its %100 Pres. Obama’s fault…right? O and for the record I agree with X234 they will continuously put new leaders up for us to kill, were fighting an idology not a physical person and before this genocide that weve created gets worse we need to end it now (current Iraqi+Afgani casualties due to war 919,967; American casualties from the wars 6,230) so nearly 1 million middle East deaths on our hands and they arnt going to stop fighting us to get out of their country, just as we wouldnt. Good god weve nearly killed 1 million people f*** that.

    • Anonymous

      Is English your first language?

  • Pingback: Good News! Al Qaeda Leader Anwar Al-Awlaki Reported Killed … | CATALOG WEB - INDEX OF THE WEB

  • Pingback: Good News! Al Qaeda Leader Anwar Al-Awlaki Reported Killed … | CATALOG WEB - INDEX OF THE WEB

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info