Keeping Us Safe From Terrorists

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com

Premium Left blogad

Left Blog Ad

Permalinks

Keeping Us Safe From Terrorists

Written By : Dave Blount

At last we have an answer to the question, “Where the hell is Secretary Napolitano?” Up she pops like a puzzled prairie dog to reveal once again that she has no clue:

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told senators it is a national security concern that people from countries with ties to terrorism could ‘potentially’ gain entry into the United States by crossing the country’s [deliberately undefended] southern border.

But according to the Department of Homeland Security’s own reports, thousands of people from 14 “special interest” countries already have come into the United States illegally, including some across the U.S.-Mexico border. (The State Department designates some nations as “special interest” counties because of their links to terrorism.)

The horses are gone? Maybe later we should shut the barn door, in case some escape.

Since no one else is going to do anything about terrorism, the task has been left to the First Lady, who has taken a remarkably original approach:

First lady Michelle Obama said at the School Nutrition Association Conference in Washington, D.C. on Monday that individuals who work in school cafeterias across the country not only educate and feed children, but help to strengthen national security.

That’s because generations ago malnutrition disqualified some Americans from military service.

This is how to keep one step ahead of al Qaeda operatives. Combating them by stressing healthy eating in government-run cafeterias is a strategy they probably never saw coming.

Maybe they should put the Bitter Half in charge of the DHS. She wouldn’t do a worse job than Nappy the Troll.

Janet Napolitano searching for a clue.

On tips from Incitatus. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

StanInTexas

We have nothing to worry about. If there is another terrorist attack on US soil, no matter how big or small; we can all rest in the knowledge that the entire Obama Administration will rush in a cadre of lawyers and counselors to make sure that the accused terrorists are afforded every right and privlidge that can be imagined. We can all sleep well knowing that the civil rights of terrorists are of the utmost importance to Obama and his minions.

Well, the victims of the terrorists and their families will not sleep so well, but that is a small price to pay to ensure fairness and American values, right Liberals?
fiscal_conservative

So stain, let me understand you correctly; you are against fairness and American values? That explains a lot.
StanInTexas

Posted by fiscal_conservative 2010-03-04 14:54:43

If you are having trouble with reading comprehension, ask for help. Otherwise you will continue to look the fool, Liberal.

Or do you prefer Jack?
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Posted by fiscal_conservative
2010-03-04 14:54:43

IS English your second language?
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

IS English your second language?

His primary language seems to be “stupidity.” Hard to tell, since he never posts anything remotely like a coherent thought.
Crimsonfella

We have forgot about 911.We have forgot about all of them Americans who died on that day and so we now live with a pre 911 mentality.I remember the meda telling us to move on and forget about it and so many Americans have.
fiscal_conservative

I am trying to understand Stains thinking. Is he trying to say that terrorist victim’s families will sleep better if we suspend the Writ of Habeas Corpus. That is what he eluded. That is a habit I don’t want this country or people to grow accustom. That was a major difference when I was growing up with the U.S. and the USSR. We were told as children that the Soviets would sweep in, take people, and hold them without trials or charges indefinitely.
StanInTexas

I am trying to understand Stains thinking. Is he trying to say that terrorist victim’s families will sleep better if we suspend the Writ of Habeas Corpus. That is what he eluded. That is a habit I don’t want this country or people to grow accustom. That was a major difference when I was growing up with the U.S. and the USSR. We were told as children that the Soviets would sweep in, take people, and hold them without trials or charges indefinitely.
Posted by fiscal_conservative 2010-03-05 08:07:19

And the lies just keep on coming. I do wish there was a Liberal on this board that could offer a debate or refute a point without using the voices in their head to put words in out mouths.
Jack Schite

It’s always someone elses fault for not misinterpreting what the texas skidmark (stain) writes. Typical conservative: he’s to credit I’d he succeeds and someone else is to blame when he fails, as is so often the case.
StanInTexas

he’s to credit I’d he succeeds
Posted by Jack Schite 2010-03-05 09:32:36

Cav, I need my dumbass-to-English translator back.
fiscal_conservative

Well, the victims of the terrorists and their families will not sleep so well, but that is a small price to pay to ensure fairness and American values, right Liberals?
Posted by StanInTexas
2010-03-04 13:43:56

Your words stain. I put nothing, although I see you are yearning, in your mouth.
StanInTexas

Your words stain. I put nothing, although I see you are yearning, in your mouth.
Posted by fiscal_conservative 2010-03-05 09:42:02

Did I mention Habeas Corpus? No, you did.

And what habit? Oh, the typical Liberal talking LIE about Bush suspending the writ. Don’t you get tired of being stupid?

I am talking about treating foreign invaders on our soils like emeny combatants, not like shoplifters.
vegeta

I put nothing, although I see you are yearning, in your mouth.

Can’t we occasionally get a troll around here that’s fluent in the English language?
fiscal_conservative

I am talking about treating foreign invaders on our soils like emeny combatants, not like shoplifters.
Posted by StanInTexas
2010-03-05 09:50:05

Stain,
In order to avoid any misinterpretation of what you did or did not say, please tell us what you are insinuating by your comment. What would you have done with the detainees of past and future? For some guidance, in case you do not know where to start; what precedent is established that takes an individual from civilian domestic authorities and turns them over to the U.S. military without some type of basis? ie. charges of a crime
StanInTexas

Posted by fiscal_conservative 2010-03-05 11:17:23

Listen closely Liberal, I’ll not play your game again.

A person tjhat is not a citizen of the US, that commits a crime on US Soil is an invader, an enemy combatant. We are at war and these acts needs to be treated like acts of war. The underware bomber is a terrorist and should have been treated as such.

The Obama Justice Department wants to take a hard line against Conservatives and ignore Liberals. They want to coddle terrorists and give them the rights of citizens.

Clear enought for you?
whats_up

A person tjhat is not a citizen of the US, that commits a crime on US Soil is an invader, an enemy combatant.

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-03-05 11:24:34

Really Stan,

So the guy who’s student visa expired from Ireland who is caught shoplifting is now an enemy combatant? God damn you are one dumb fuck redneck.
MediumHeadBoy

Jesus Christ, cretins, that may be the most idiotic thing you’ve ever posted here, and that covers some ground.
StanInTexas

So the guy who’s student visa expired from Ireland who is caught shoplifting is now an enemy combatant?
Posted by whats_up 2010-03-05 12:43:16

Words fail me!
whats_up

Words fail me!
Posted by StanInTexas
2010-03-05 13:23:53

Why would they fail you, after all you were the one that uttered this nonesense:

A person tjhat is not a citizen of the US, that commits a crime on US Soil is an invader, an enemy combatant.
Toastrider

Stan is slightly overstating the case. I say ‘slightly’ because at the core of it, he is right.

Foreign nationals are /not/ entitled to anything except a one-way ticket home. You want to stay here for good, you become a citizen.

See, I have something of a close-in view of this. My best buddy and coworker got married a couple years ago to a nice girl. From Taiwan. I have watched those two jump through hoops repeatedly because they want to do it right. And I have encouraged and applauded them every step of the way.

So it makes me furious when people piss all over the concept of border security and enforcing immigration law.

You want some prior precedent? How about the German spies who snuck into the U.S. during WW2? We caught them. Six were executed after conviction by a military tribunal. Two copped prison terms (those were the two who had chickened out and ratted on their buddies).

Here’s another eye-opener for you: the whole ‘Irish student’ thing is a strawman. How many Irish students arrive in the U.S. with incendiaries in their underwear? We don’t have to treat said student as an enemy combatant because he’s not committing acts of war against us. We catch him shoplifting with an expired visa, we kick him out, send him home.

But no, you’d rather play goddamn pattycake with sociopathic savages, all in the name of rules that don’t even apply. The Geneva Conventions state that nonuniformed combatants should be shot. The laws of the U.S. were written for citizens, not deluded morons from backwards countries who think the best way to improve their sad lives is to commit suicide and homicide with explosives and airplanes.

Die in a fire, whats_up.

If I Was Your President (Boyfriend Spoof)

Premium Right Ads

Blogads Right

Previous Features

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time

Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married

Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies

The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web

User Info

Features

Archives Best of RWN Humor John Hawkins Interviews Quotes Special to RWN