AG Lynch Will Only Release Partial Orlando Transcripts, Avoiding That Messy Islamic Terrorism Stuff

by William Teach | June 20, 2016 7:07 am

Citizens must be protected from hearing that the Pulse nightclub jihadi was doing it for Islam (video at the link)

(Real Clear Politics[1]) In an interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd, Attorney General Loretta Lynch says that on Monday, the FBI will release edited transcripts of the 911 calls made by the Orlando nightclub shooter to the police during his rampage.

“What we’re not going to do is further proclaim this man’s pledges of allegiance to terrorist groups, and further his propaganda,” Lynch said. “We are not going to hear him make his assertions of allegiance [to the Islamic State].”

This is in reference to all his calls to 911 and others, which contained multiple references to ISIS, Islamist values, and defense of the Boston bombers, among others.

CHUCK TODD: We’re not going to hear him talk about those things?

LYNCH: We will hear him talk about some of those things, but we are not going to hear him make his assertions of allegiance and that. It will not be audio, it will be a printed transcript. But it will begin to capture the back and forth between him and the negotiators, we’re trying to get as much information about this investigation out as possible. As you know, because the killer is dead, we have a bit more leeway there and we will be producing that information tomorrow.

One has to ask, if the killer was a Republican, conservative, or a Tea Party member, proclaiming those values, would the transcript be edited? What if they were a KKK member, a Sovereign Citizen, or just about anything else, would the transcripts be edited? Of course not. This administration, the majority of the media, and Democrats overall work overtime to protect extremist Islam, even at the expense of other Democratic Party voter blocks, such as the LGBT community.

As DaTechGuy[2] notes “(the Obama administration is) going to censor any information that is not consistent with the approved narrative of the Democrat party in particular and the White House in particular.

William A. Jacobson[3] writes “Calling BS on that. This is all about Obama’s attempt to extricate the reality of Mateen’s Islamic terror motivations from the public discourse.” And notes a comment by a Legal Insurrection reader, who says that this violates Florida open information laws.

I didn’t mention the Dylann Roof incident. Liberty Unyielding[4] does

The DOJ was apparently happy to do that — to “further” Roof’s imputed propaganda, and “further proclaim pledges of allegiance” that he never actually made in relation to the attack. For some reason, it wasn’t dangerous to the American public to have the Confederate flag (and a hysteria-wave about “white supremacism”) shoved in its face after the Charleston attack. It was perfectly fine for the federal authorities to not just let Americans get a big load of Roof’s imputed propaganda, but to make it up and broadcast it for him.

Pamela Geller[5] calls this Sharia compliance in America. This administration is willing to impugn gun owners, Republicans, Conservatives, White people, and just about every group but Islamists.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove[6]. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach[7].

  1. Real Clear Politics:
  2. DaTechGuy:
  3. William A. Jacobson:
  4. Liberty Unyielding:
  5. Pamela Geller:
  6. Pirate’s Cove:
  7. @WilliamTeach:

Source URL: