Iran Ready To Execute 18 Year Old Under Fake Sodomy Charges

For all you liberal dhimmi’s out there, as you ignore the threat from radical Islam and the calls for Sharia law here in the United States, this is the kind of thing it brings

An 18-year-old Iranian is facing imminent execution on charges of homosexuality, even though he has no legal representation. Ebrahim Hamidi, who is not gay, was sentenced to death for lavat, or sodomy, on the basis of “judge’s knowledge”, a legal loophole that allows for subjective judicial rulings where there is no conclusive evidence.

Hamidi had been represented by human rights lawyer Mohammad Mostafaei, who has since been forced to flee Iran after bringing to international attention the case of another of his clients, Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, a 43-year-old Iranian mother of two who has been sentenced to death by stoning for adultery. Mostafaei was due to arrive in Norway yesterday to begin a life in exile while continuing his campaigns on behalf of his clients, including Hamidi.

Tolerance is not something tolerated within the radical Muslim world (though, really, the Muslims who are not hard core are truly the radicals, as they are not following the rules of the Koran)

Hamidi was arrested two years ago in the suburbs of the western city of Tabriz in the East Azerbaijan province after a fight with members of another family. Three of his friends were also involved in the incident and were subsequently arrested. Later, the four were accused of homosexual assault on a man and of attempting to abuse him sexually.

A person convicted of homosexuality in Iran can be lashed, hanged or stoned to death. The law includes a variety of penalties for different acts: 99 lashes if two unrelated males sleep “unnecessarily” under the same blanket — even without any sexual contact. A boy raped by an adult man would also be lashed if the court decided that he had “enjoyed” the experience.

Hamid was forced to confess under torture (real torture, not sleep deprivation, loud Christina Aguilera music, and no desert after dinner). The accuser later recanted. In Iran and the Islamist world, that doesn’t matter. Even the possibility that it occurred will cause penalties, up to and including execution. This is the kind of judicial system being pushed in mosques across the USA, and what the Imam of the possible Ground Zero mosque wants for America. Surprisingly, there has been little outcry from homosexuals about the threat to them from Islam. They may complain about the inability to marry and some bias here in the USA, but, they have little worry about being lashed and executed. And women will be treated no better. As Smart Girl Politics points out, liberals have some explaining to do

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the ACLU, and the go-along-to get-along throng who support building a massive mosque at Ground Zero need to explain why they’re okay with a Shariah version of Jim Crow laws for women in America. Are they ignorant or just indifferent to backers of the mosque who promote Shariah law as compatible with U.S. law?

While we’re at it, NOW and its feminist allies need to explain their deafening silence. Are they placated by the assumption that gals might join men in the pool at an Islamic center “guided by Islamic values”? Is the National Council of Women’s Organizations still too busy trying to crack the membership glass ceiling at Augusta National Golf Club to get teed off about industrial-strength inequality of women?

One would think that liberals would stand up against Islamists and their treatment of gays and women, among others. It seems that, instead, they have decided that supporting whatever Conservatives are against is the better choice. Their obscene politics override any morals liberals may have.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach

Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!