Julian Assange Associate Drops BOMBSHELL About DNC Leaks

Julian Assange Associate Drops BOMBSHELL About DNC Leaks

I find myself on this Russian thing smack dab in the middle and not on either side. A former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, is now saying that the DNC emails were not leaked by the Russians, but by an insider. I doubt that very much. And excuse me if I doubt someone so cozy with the Russians. Murray is a close confidant of Julian Assange, who is a propaganda outlet for the Russians. I believe the emails Assange leaked for the most part, although I suspect some were manipulated. But saying that the Russians had nothing to do with anything is as bad as accusing the Russians of directly hacking our voting machines. Both are bull crap.

Notice that this guy doesn’t name the direct inside leak… he’s very vague about the whole thing. I have never trusted WikiLeaks and no one should be uber quick to jump on their bandwagon. You also can’t disconnect who leaked the emails from what they say, because you have no way of knowing how much they were manipulated and what wasn’t released. The Dems were hacked by the Russians probably. But the Russians had no means to directly affect the actual voting process. The Russians should be investigated for their meddling in our affairs, but that in no way impugns Donald Trump and the fact that he won the election fair and square.

wikileaks

From BizPac Review:

Trending: The 15 Best Conservative News Sites On The Internet

A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.

On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.

“I know who leaked them,” Murray told The Guardian. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.

Murray, who is a close associate of Wikileaks head Julian Assange, explained it further on his website.

“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

Of course Assange has denied Russian involvement from the beginning. He’s on their payroll just as Edward Snowden is. You will never convince me otherwise. Having said that, Russia did not deliver the presidency to Donald Trump… the American people did and the left just can’t stand that. Too freaking bad.

And frankly, if Hillary and the Dems hadn’t been so corrupt and dirty, leaked emails would never have been a factor. That’s like saying that Hillary lost the election because someone told the truth. The honest answer to the Russian problem lies in the middle. The election is not the problem… the Russians are and the corrupt Democrats who are trying to exploit the situation.

wikileaks1

You Might Like
Avatar

Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

Terresa Monroe-Hamilton is an editor and writer for Right Wing News. She owns and blogs at NoisyRoom.net. She is a Constitutional Conservative and NoisyRoom focuses on political and national issues of interest to the American public. Terresa is the editor at Trevor Loudon's site, New Zeal - trevorloudon.com. She also does research at KeyWiki.org. You can email Terresa here. NoisyRoom can be found on Facebook and on Twitter.

Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!