by Dave Blount | January 29, 2016 12:22 pm
The world watched in horror as Muslim immigrants sexually molested hundreds of European women in public on New Year’s Eve. Many wondered what had happened to the European men. Alexander Maistrovoy may have the answer:
[F]or us who grew up in Soviet Russia, it would be inconceivable that some drunk young people could publicly mock and harass girls on New Year’s Eve in the very center of Moscow or Saint Petersburg. If they dared to do this, they wouldn’t survive until the morning, they would become “martyrs” and would have their way with 72 virgins in a completely different realm.
Ethical codes, embedded in us on a genetic level, would demand that we intervene on behalf of the women. …
As it turned out in Germany, Sweden, Austria – these codes were fatally violated. A great number of strong healthy men, having heard the girls screaming and crying, and having seen the crimes being committed, didn’t do anything to save the victims.
Not only did European men for the most part not defend the violated women, European women didn’t either.
Again, genetic codes didn’t work. We heard women blaming the victims and defending the rapists. We heard Henriette Reker, the mayor of Cologne, who claimed that “there’s always the possibility of keeping a certain distance of more than an arm’s length”; Claudia Roth from the Green Party, who accused an “organized mob” on the Internet of “calling for a hunt on non-white people”. We learned about dozens of female journalists who concealed the truth because the rapists were “refugees”.
Feminists? We didn’t hear their voices. As we haven’t heard their voices in Sweden, Norway and England, where thousands of girls have long ago been turned into “white meat”.
Instead, all we hear is a subtle mumble, like that of the expert Irmgard Kopetzky, who states that “sexual violence is an issue for people of all ethnic origins”.
Cultural relativism is the last refuge of a P.C. scoundrel.
But how was the natural instinct to defend native women from foreign invaders suppressed?
The answer is sad – the culture of postmodernism has managed to do what couldn’t be achieved even by the Communist propaganda machine. It has degraded the instinct of self-preservation, natural reactions embedded in humans on a genetic level, the ability to feel compassion and protect a victim – a woman, a girl, a child. An abstract ideology has suppressed the mind and senses.
I left USSR as a hater of Soviet totalitarianism. Now I realize that the cultural totalitarianism of political correctness has turned out to be much more poisonous.
The Soviet regime dictated harsh rules and established censorship. However people remained normal human beings. They laughed at authorities, composed jokes about Brezhnev, made satirical films in spite of the censorship, and learned to read newspapers between the lines.
“Postmodern cultural totalitarianism” (a.k.a. political correctness) has imposed a more profound form of tyranny in the West.
It affirmed a relentless self-censorship, turned people into sterile zombies, and exterminated basic senses of responsibility and dignity. It changed the very nature of man…
If we don’t manage to change it back again quickly, we will meet a fate foretold by Darwin.
On a tip from fredrickbarbarossa. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.
Source URL: https://rightwingnews.com/immigration/the-root-cause-of-colognization/
Copyright ©2021 John Hawkins' Right Wing News unless otherwise noted.