Islam’s One-Two Punch: Violence Then Political Correctness

by Dave Blount | January 12, 2015 12:41 pm

Muslims employ a one-two punch to intimidate the West into submission. The first fist is violence. The second, more effective weapon is political correctness. For example, the horrific Charlie Hebdo massacre was infuriatingly but predictably followed up by sniveling about “Islamophobia”:

Julie Borik says she and other Garland [Texas] Tea Party members are outraged after hearing about two speakers who will appear at an upcoming event to combat Islamophobia at the Curtis Culwell Center, which is owned by the Garland [Independent School District]. …

One of the speakers is New York City Imam Siraj Wahhaj.

A letter from federal prosecutors to a judge in 1995 lists Wahhaj and nearly 200 others as “un-indicted persons who may be alleged as co-conspirators” during the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Wahhaj is also known to anti-terror experts for extremist anti-American statements and for advocating the imposition of Islamic law in the USA.

Imposing sharia is the point not only of murdering cartoonists, but also of bleating absurdly about Islamophobia as the bodies cool.

Imams aren’t the only ones to employ the strategy. Their ally in the White House is taking part too:

The civilized world is still reeling from Wednesday’s brutal attack against the French satirical publication Charlie Hebdo by gunmen seeking revenge for cartoons attacking Islam. Nevertheless, reported Thursday, the White House announced it would make fighting Islamophobia a priority.

“Never mind that most Westerners aren’t Islamophobic, but rather GettingShotInTheFaceForExpressingMyOpinion-Phobic,” Ben Shapiro wrote. Speaking with reporters, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said the real problem is lack of leadership in defending Islam.

“There are some individuals that are using a peaceful religion and grossly distorting it, and trying to use its tenets to inspire people around the globe to carry out acts of violence,” he said. “And we have enjoyed significant success in enlisting leaders in the Muslim community, like I said, both in the United States and around the world to condemn that kind of messaging, to condemn those efforts to radicalize individuals, and to be clear about what the tenets of Islam actually are. And we’re going to redouble those efforts in the days and weeks ahead.”

The denial of reality could not be more extreme. Islam is and always has been an extremely violent ideology. Its most conspicuous aspect is the insistence that everyone on earth must be forced to submit to it. The word “Islam” means “submission.” Thus all the terrorism, since Muslim society is too profoundly inferior to compete with Western countries on the battlefield.

You don’t need a history degree to understand this. Simply pick up a newspaper, scrape off the coating of politically correct spin, and you are left with story after story, year after year, of this evil cult inspiring evil people to commit evil deeds with the tacit support of our liberal overlords.

[T]he White House now thinks part of its job is to defend Islam and teach Americans what it really believes [or rather, what its advocates regard as strategically advantageous to convince its victims that it believes]. The stunning comment came in response to a question from a reporter who asked if the administration is concerned about a similar attack happening in the U.S. and if any plans are in place to raise threat levels in response to the attack.

“And obviously, we’re still trying to figure out exactly, like I said, who’s responsible for this attack in Paris, what their motivations are,” Earnest added.

The terrorists openly stated their motive: to inflict Islam. Once the point had been made, their media allies erased it from the public record in preparation for the second punch.

How long would FDR have stayed in office if he had responded to Pearl Harbor by sending out spokesliars to pule about Japanophobia and wonder aloud what the motive could have been?

This is not the country it once was, or a certain Islamophile would long since have been dragged out of the White House by the scruff of his neck.

The inaptly named Earnest jabbered further, praising the Islamic State for “using some pretty sophisticated social media strategies.”

The most sophisticated strategy used on behalf of expansionist Islam is the Islamophobia canard. It is employed to defuse the righteous anger that would enable us to fight off Muslim aggression effectively. Muslims and their fellow travelers are actually able to make Americans feel guilty about their natural impulse to defend themselves, and even to feel self-righteous about siding with their enemies.

Will never side with the West against Third World savages.

On tips from Lyle, Python, and Stormfax. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

Source URL: