For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Politico Op-Ed: TEA Partiers Are Terrorists
Written By : William Teach

The actual headline reads “The tea party’s terrorist tactics“, which is interesting, when one considers that The Politico, like so many other leftist news outlets, refers to actual Islamist terrorists as militants and insurgents. And, having kept track of so many liberal blogs and forums for a long time, the Left generally thinks of Conservatives as The Enemy in the same way Conservatives consider al Qaeda as an enemy

It has become commonplace to call the tea party faction in the House “hostage takers.” But they have now become full-blown terrorists.

It’s actually kind of surprising that the Politico would allow this kind of “un-civil” rhetoric, but, hey, in today’s news cycle, the biggest stories tend to be attention whore ones.

They have joined the villains of American history who have been sufficiently craven to inflict massive harm on innocent victims to achieve their political goals. A strong America has always stood firm in the face of terrorism. That tradition is in jeopardy, as Congress and President Barack careen toward an uncertain outcome in the tea party- manufactured debt crisis.

I distinctly remember many on the Left wanting to leave Afghanistan alone and, instead, sit back and consider what America did to tick al Qaeda off. Barack Obama was one of them.

As we stumble closer to Aug. 2, it has become clear that many in the tea party are willing to inflict massive harm on the American people to obtain their political objective of a severely shrunken federal government. Their persistence in rejecting compromise, even as the economic effects of the phony crisis they have created mount, has taken their radicalism beyond tough negotiating, beyond even hostage-taking.

So, if we apply the same “logic” (or, should that be, apoplexy?) to the Democrats, they are willing to inflict massive harm on the American people in order to continue spending more money to increase the size of the federal government and mortgage and destroy the future of our next generations.

As markets fall in anticipation that there may not be a timely resolution; as credit agencies issue dire warnings that the U.S. political system has become so dysfunctional that a credit downgrade may be inevitable, and as America looks weakened in the eyes of the world, the tea party’s hostage-taking has evolved into the intentional infliction of harm on innocent Americans to achieve a political objective – terrorism.

Terrorism is a tough term, but, unfortunately, it describes tea party tactics precisely. Their first step was to vow not to vote to raise the debt ceiling.

Whatever you say, sparky. But, tell me, William Yeomans, why should we listen to a man who “served as Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel on the Senate Judiciary Committee”? Didn’t it bother you to work for a man who ran away to create an alibi as a young woman was left in a car that was slowly sinking into a river, allowing her plenty of time to think about her coming death from drowning?

Anyhow, how do you respond to unhinged liberals? Well, I don’t see a need to give a juvenile rant an adult answer, so,

Oh, and you should probably try this, Will

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach.

3
  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

    Terrorist is the wrong word. Just as “marxist” or “socialist” is for Obama.

    However, if no deal is done on raising the debt limit and if the markets fall precipitously because of this and IF America’s credit rating and with it many others rise and have the effect of costing americans and business significant money, it will be due to a manufactured crisis that is the cause of primarily the Tea Party.

    But terroirists? No.

    And by the way, If anyone thinks the blame for this possible outcome will not fall on Republicans, then they don’t read the political tea leaves well, they don’t understand the American electorate and they don’t understand the American media.

    • gfchicago

      they don’t understand the American media.

      Oh we understand it all to well.  They are all in the bag for President Snippy Pants.  They will twist everything they can to try and save his sorry ass. Plus the American electorate is waking from a long slumber and they are getting pissed.

      This issue is about evenly split down the middle in this country.

      So we will see who’s right come the next election cycle,.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

        GF,

        King Snippy Pants sounds like fun. I wouldn’t mind being that king if I knew what it meant.

        As for the claim that Obama is a Marxist, then you have to apply that same label to just about everyone else in Congress if as you redefine the term. That said, if you want to use the REAL definition of Marxist then yo have to show me anyone in Congress or the executive branch that has advocated that the people own all the means of production. Good luck with that.

        That waking of America you refer to is is one that will be accompanied by a confrontation with higher interest rates, lost jobs and a fundamentally worse economy that can be traced precisely to a a manufactured debt crisis that the Tea Party choose to create. Americans will perfectly understand who to blame. And you are right. The Media will confirm their suspicions. It bodes poorly for Republicans.

        • Hologram5

          Your boy is a one and done loser.  When his own party is calling him out you know there’s problems.  And yes, that woman Nooner has called him a loser which means your party of dolts is falling apart.

        • gfchicago

          the executive branch that has advocated that the people own all the means of production.

          Obummer is a Marxist, he’s taken over 2 car companies and I’m sure that if he could get away with it he would take over more companies.  

          That waking of America you refer to is is one that will be accompanied by a confrontation with higher interest rates, lost jobs and a fundamentally worse economy that can be traced precisely to a a manufactured debt crisis that the Tea Party President Snippy Pants choose to create.

          There FIFY

          Obummer has created this mess.  
          He refuses to compromise with the Republicans about raising taxes during a recession which is the worst thing that you can do.  This could all be avoided if he would do that and you know it.

          Quite frankly in order to raise the debt limit, conditions need to be applied to future spending levels.  We can’t continue to do this WE  THE AMERICAN PUBLIC ARE BROKE.   You can’t continue to steal from others to give to others that haven’t worked for it.

          I have no problem with what the current recipients of SSI and Medicare are receiving.  However this is going to need to  be address for the younger workers.  I think for the younger workers they should be given a small percentage of their payroll taxes to invest as they see fit and start slowly weaning people off it.

          SSI is nothing but one big poncy scheme to begin with.

          I do believe that there should be a safety net, however just not as big as it currently is.   

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michelle-Hart/100001365605444 Michelle Hart

      Sooooo coward….. When you planing to call me out??

      I’m getting kinda bored waiting for you to show me whatcha got for us commie!

      Watsa matta….. Skeerd??? C’mon chicken…. dont wet your pants…. little boy.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

        Mr. Hart:

        You scare me in fundamental ways. Unhinged and untethered is a scary combination.

        • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

          Yeah, that’s why we’re not fond of Obama, Reid, and Pelosi.

    • Daytrip

      You maxed out our credit card and now we are manufacturing a crisis by not applying for another one when you refuse to lower your drunken spending? I’m sure everyone would be a liberal if everything was free to be grabbed by a star trek replicator, but this retarded stuff that a corrupt congress and Obama (and Bush) have shoved down our throats have to be paid from somewhere. However, since this “manufactured crisis” demostrates loudly that your world view is incompatible with reality, I guess it is time to call people terrorists.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

        “Terrorist” is the wrong word. However, “manufacturers of crisis’ where the debt issue and its consequences are concerned IS the right word.

        The question is this: can our debt be dealt with without causing the kind of interest rate increases and elimination of wealth that would result from this manufactured crisis? Yes, it can.

        America gets hurt and the Republican party loses as a result of all this. Kiss any chance at the executive branch goodbye, Republicans.

        • gfchicago

          America gets hurt and the Republican party loses as a result of all this. Kiss any chance at the executive branch goodbye, Republicans.

          Like I told you before the country is evenly spit on this issue.  So we shall see who has the last laugh after the next election cycle.

        • Anonymous

          Do you believe that spending and deficits are in anyway related?

          Apparently not.  It’s only revenue.

          Ok, so let’s do a little thought experiment.

          If our spending rate is zero dollars then our revenue can be any amount (0 to infinite) without creating a deficit.  As long as we say spending must be less than revenue we will not have a deficit.  Clearly the amount of taxes coming in are not the sole cause of debt. 

          But if our spending rate is perpetually greater than our revenue IT DOESN’T”T MATTER IF OUR REVENUE IS INCREASED because we will always spend more than that amount and have a deficit.

          So explain please how raising taxes to even 100% of the GDP will result in a balanced budget when we continue to spend 2 dollars for every 1 we bring in. 

        • Anonymous

          Do you believe that spending and deficits are in anyway related?

          Apparently not.  It’s only revenue.

          Ok, so let’s do a little thought experiment.

          If our spending rate is zero dollars then our revenue can be any amount (0 to infinite) without creating a deficit.  As long as we say spending must be less than revenue we will not have a deficit.  Clearly the amount of taxes coming in are not the sole cause of debt. 

          But if our spending rate is perpetually greater than our revenue IT DOESN’T”T MATTER IF OUR REVENUE IS INCREASED because we will always spend more than that amount and have a deficit.

          So explain please how raising taxes to even 100% of the GDP will result in a balanced budget when we continue to spend 2 dollars for every 1 we bring in. 

        • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

          Nobody really knows what 300 million Americans really think about every issue, but if you believe polling, then Obama is taking it in the shorts on this, and so are the Democrats with him.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

            Obama’s approval rating is today what Clinton’s was at the same point in his presidency. Bush’s was about 4 or 5 points higher at the same time.

            Neither Bush or Clinton inherited anything like the economy that Obama did.

            At to this the fact that at this point, you’ve got Romney leading the way and is about to lose to a fringe candidate in Iowa.

            Add to this that the republicans are about to get blamed for America defaulting on its obligations and all the fall out from it.

            Yea, I’m betting on Obama.

          • gfchicago

            Just keep telling yourself that George and you will get to watch President Snippy Pants and the First Wookie sent packing back to Chicago in Jan ’13…

            It’s going to be the dems that get blamed for this whole mess.

            As far as Romney goes, I would say that the majority of the base doesn’t trust him.

            I know I sure as hell don’t.

            He’s a friggin RINO.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

            I don’t know what “first wookie” means, so I’ll let that lie until you explain.

            The problem you have is that 60% of Americans describe themselves as Moderate or left of Moderate. This means what everyone knows: In a general election a candidate needs to appeal to the middle.

            The only candidate currently running that can appeal to the middle is Romney and Huntsman. Bachmann, Cain, Pawlenty…They can’t.

            What you will get if the hard right nominates a member of the Republican fringe is a second Obama Administration where he doesn’t have to worry about re-election.

          • gfchicago

            Like that really worked for us the last time with McLame.

            They said the same things about President Ronald Reagan.

            We all know how that turned out.

            I’m tired of the lib/progressives choosing our candidates for us.

            Oh and by the way the First Wookie is Michelle Obama.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

            Regarding “First Wooking”, yes I realize you meant Michelle Obama. I just don’t know what you mean to imply or say by using the term.

            Nobody but republicans have ever chosen your candidate. So that weird claim is off the table.

            If republicans want to wine the general election, choose an economic conservative and a moderate on social issues. Not a social absolutist, bible thumping, gay hating neanderthal.

          • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

            Good for you.  Bush’s approval ratings never dipped under 50% until 2006, though, you bozo.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

        “Terrorist” is the wrong word. However, “manufacturers of crisis’ where the debt issue and its consequences are concerned IS the right word.

        The question is this: can our debt be dealt with without causing the kind of interest rate increases and elimination of wealth that would result from this manufactured crisis? Yes, it can.

        America gets hurt and the Republican party loses as a result of all this. Kiss any chance at the executive branch goodbye, Republicans.

    • Hologram5

      The American media is a waste of time and space.  They are nothing more than water carrying leftists that will NOT report actual facts.  It’s more opinion than news anymore.  There hasn’t been any REAL investigative journalism in 15 yrs or so.  It’s all copy and paste now in this digital age.  It’s a joke, complete and utterly.  Bloggers like on this site are the last bastion of real journalism.  It’s YOU that doesn’t understand the American media.  Go back to watching american idolt and put the blinders back in place.

    • Hologram5

      The American media is a waste of time and space.  They are nothing more than water carrying leftists that will NOT report actual facts.  It’s more opinion than news anymore.  There hasn’t been any REAL investigative journalism in 15 yrs or so.  It’s all copy and paste now in this digital age.  It’s a joke, complete and utterly.  Bloggers like on this site are the last bastion of real journalism.  It’s YOU that doesn’t understand the American media.  Go back to watching american idolt and put the blinders back in place.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

        You are mistaking “opinion” for Journalism if you think this site is an example of journalism. Opinion is fine. But lets’ not suggest that commenting on a commentary is reporting.

        • Hologram5

          Dude please, 95% of ALL stories posted on say, msnbc, cbs news, usatoday, and the likes ALL have the writer’s opinion slanting the story to their bias and if you don’t see that then you need to be taking your medication.  What a joke these so called news outlets have become.  They are more opinion than news.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

            Holo:

            Do you really believe this blog is “journalism”, as you stated above? Really? It’s links to other stories that other reporters have written about then commenting?

            Let’s have a discussion when you actually learn what “journalism” is.

    • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

      “Just as “marxist” or “socialist” is for Obama.”
       
      Well, I have to agree with you there. Technically, the correct term for a system under which businesses appear to be run by private entities but are in fact controlled by the State through oppressive regulation is Fascism.
       
      “If anyone thinks the blame for this possible outcome will not fall on Republicans, then they don’t read the political tea leaves well, they don’t understand the American electorate and they don’t understand the American media.”
       
      Would that by any chance be the same political tea leaves and media that said the Tea Paty was a tiny, powerless group of fringe nobodies, and the same American electorate which put them into office to stop the Obama spending juggernaut –which they appear to be doing? I’m just wondering.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

        The Tea Party is fringe…very fringe. Furthermore, they appear to be willing to cause massive damage to the American economy for reasons that don’t necessitate it.

        When politics becomes a zero sum game, it’s no longer politics. It’s Talibanism.

        • gfchicago

          The Tea Party Liberal Left is fringe…very fringe. Furthermore, they appear to be willing to cause massive damage to the American economy for reasons that don’t necessitate it.

          There FIFY.

          It’s Talibanism

          Thought you said Marxist, Socialist, ect.. was wrong to apply to President Snippy Pants.  Good to know that you have double standards.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

            Allow me to offer a bit of a lesson in rhetoric. When making an argument, if you are going to use words like Marxism or Socialist, you ought to be aware that they have specific meanings that are and have been commonly applied to those words. Marxism and Socialism are in fact well established philosophies that do have very specific meanings.

            Talibanism….made up word created to evoke a set of images and ideas that one is likely, but not by any definition, associated with the Taliban.

            There you go. 

          • gfchicago

            Those were your words moron.  You are the one that brought them up dumbass.

            And yes we do know what those words mean.

            You just pick and choose what components of these ideologies that you like to hit the conservatives over the head with by declaring we don’t know what it means.

            So Stuff it George.  You obviously don’t have a clear grasp of what these things mean.

            Talibanism….made up word created to evoke a set of images and ideas that one is likely, but not by any definition, associated with the Taliban.

            You are a friggin idiot to say that it has no meaning.

            You lie continually and then wonder why no we don’t particularly take you very seriously.

            You do have a double standard with the name calling asshole.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

            GF, as long as you call Obama a “marxist” or “socialist” and don’t apply the same term to every congress person, then you demonstrate you have no care for what the words mean.

            They have actual meaning that have not changed in a century. Obama does not advocate that the people or state own the means of the production. To suggestion otherwise is silly.

        • gfchicago

          HAHAHAHAH.  Who’s being the Taliban now?

          http://minx.cc/?post=319445

          Harry “The Troll” Reid is throwing a temper tantrum.

        • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

          “The Tea Party is fringe…very fringe.”

          Keep telling yourself that, slick. It’s funny to watch.

        • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

          “The Tea Party is fringe…very fringe.”

          Keep telling yourself that, slick. It’s funny to watch.

        • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

          The only reason the Tea party looks fringe to you is because you’re such a lefty extremist.  When you’re so left leaning you’re horizontal, everyone standing up looks like a radical.

    • Anonymous

      We’re the ones trying to avoid a default.

      The dems solution is raise the debt ceiling, spend at ever increasing rates in a mad rush to get to the new debt ceiling, blame republicans, then repeat ad infinitum.

      What makes you think raising the debt ceiling with absolutely no cuts or obligation to balance the budget (the dems plan) will lead to lasting growth and the preservation of our credit rating?

      Your brilliant plan to stave off insolvency is no different than getting a new credit card to pay off the debts on the old one.  At best it differs the problems to a later date. 

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

        If republicans really were concerned with debt and not politics, they would have made this stand under Bush. But, of course, they didn’t.

        There is no question whatsoever that just like in 1994, the Republicans will properly be saddled with the blame for harming America.

        • Toastrider

          You dunce. Where did you think the tea party CAME from? It coalesced from the 2006 and 2008 elections, when the conservative base got royally pissed off with the RNC’s spend-happy tendencies.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

            Wrong…the Tea Party began in 2009.

          • gfchicago

            You are seriously delusional if you think that this just started in 2009.  I guess you read the first paragraph of the Wikipedia entry.  Actually the sentiment had been boiling over for sometime so Toastrider is correct.

            You on the other hand just want to believe all of this sentiment just started happening in 2009 to thwart that Idiot  in the White House and the Democrat held congress in 2009,

          • gfchicago

            You are seriously delusional if you think that this just started in 2009.  I guess you read the first paragraph of the Wikipedia entry.  Actually the sentiment had been boiling over for sometime so Toastrider is correct.

            You on the other hand just want to believe all of this sentiment just started happening in 2009 to thwart that Idiot  in the White House and the Democrat held congress in 2009,

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

            Sorry GF…There was no such “Tea Party” or anything like it prior to Obama.

          • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

            So you think nothing had any origin until the exact point it finally coalesced?  you think people fall in love when they get married?  That children only begin to exist when they’re born?  Wait, you do think that, never mind.

    • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

      Obama isn’t a Marxist, that’s for sure.  Socialist?  Absolutely, without question. That anyone would seriously question that puts some doubt to either their sanity or comprehension of the word “socialist.”

      The sad thing is I believe you really do think the Democrats are absolutely 100% right in not wanting any cuts and Republicans should give in completely and obey.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

        And yet the democrats had agreed to $4 Trillion in cuts. So, that argument is off the table.

        In addition, Socialism is an economic philosophy that seeks to nationalize the means of production. How do you square this with the fact that Obama has never advocated such a system and with the fact that he has talked repeatedly about strengthening small business.

        You either don’t know what “socialism” is or you want to change its definition to mean “whatever I say it means”.

        • gfchicago

          Yeah 4 trillion in cuts and raising taxes during a recession.  Yeah that’s real smart.  Lets just make it a depression with that kind of thinking.  

          Plus no debating raising the debt ceiling until Jan. of ’13 so Obummer can campaign, not that he’s ever stopped.  It’s going to need to be debated again in March, we just can’t continue to do this crap.  Expenses need to be prioritized, we simply can’t continue in this vain.  All you frigging libs/progressives are a bunch of thieves.  A debate needs to be held ever single time a President, Republican or Democrat proposes increasing the debt ceiling.   Our credit card is maxed out stupid.  I wish I could just say oh my credit card is maxed out I’m going to raise the limit.  I’m sure the banks would go along with that. 

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

            “A debate needs to be held ever single time a President, Republican or Democrat proposes increasing the debt ceiling.”

            Had this case been made under Bush, I’d give you credit for standing on principle. But…

          • gfchicago

            Bush, I’d give you credit for standing on principle. But…

            You fucking moron, you seem to forget that we howled about his profligate spending. But you seem to have a very selective memory. Also there is the fact that your hero in March of 2006 voted against raising the ceiling and sighting that it was a failure of leadership. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.

            I am simply beyond caring which political party is in the White House. It needs to be done.

            The American Public needs to be involved with this.

            Both parties have spent us into the stratosphere and it needs to be stopped period.  Democrats more so than Republicans.  Again I don’t care who’s in office it needs to be done.

            WHAT PART OF WE ARE BROKE DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2Y3S2PLHX7E4T46IDHMUL373FI George T

            GF,

            I believe the debt ceiling issue is politics, not principle for the simple reason that it never occurred under Bush. Nothing comparing to the intransigence we see now occurred.

            It’s politics. Political backmail. The House could stop all business and ask for spending cuts if they wanted to. But instead, they threaten the American and World economy over an issue that is not an issue and never has been under republicans.

          • gfchicago

            I’m glad you finally admitted that it is purely political and Obama is scaring the hell out of everyone for no reason.

            We will not default.

            However I still believe that every time it is proposed to raise the debt ceiling, it needs to be debated.

            Lets get it out into the light of day what these morons on Capital Hill are proposing to spend our money on.

            Don’t go into the debt ceiling raise is just to cover current debt that we have incurred.  It needs to be offset with cuts in the future.

            That’s why I like Rand Paul’s penny bill.  It starts to reduce the deficit.

            And I agree with the Cap & Balance amendment, that way it would take a majority of congress to raise our taxes.  No more of this willy nilley bullshit of raising taxes just on some stupid whim of the democraps.

            It’s Obama’s fucking lying all of the time that threatens our economy.

          • gfchicago

            I’m glad you finally admitted that it is purely political and Obama is scaring the hell out of everyone for no reason.

            We will not default.

            However I still believe that every time it is proposed to raise the debt ceiling, it needs to be debated.

            Lets get it out into the light of day what these morons on Capital Hill are proposing to spend our money on.

            Don’t go into the debt ceiling raise is just to cover current debt that we have incurred.  It needs to be offset with cuts in the future.

            That’s why I like Rand Paul’s penny bill.  It starts to reduce the deficit.

            And I agree with the Cap & Balance amendment, that way it would take a majority of congress to raise our taxes.  No more of this willy nilley bullshit of raising taxes just on some stupid whim of the democraps.

            It’s Obama’s fucking lying all of the time that threatens our economy.

          • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

            We did, and there was a debate, but you seem to think that raising the debt ceiling by small amounts is the same as raising it to MORE THAN FOURTEEN TRILLION DOLLARS.  That’s either idiotic or deliberately deceptive on your part.

            You pick which is better.

        • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

          No they didn’t.  The Reid plan proposes spending by 4 trillion, then writes it off, treating it as if that’s a cut.  They cut nothing; the couple billion that actually are reductions in the plan are reductions in the amount of increase.

          Let me put that more plainly: they want to increase, not decrease spending.  They just are proposing increasing it by a very tiny amount less.

          Increase.

          And saying Obama isn’t a socialist because he has not totally taken over the entire economy yet is like saying someone isn’t a mass murderer because they only killed 15 instead of 500 people.  His philosophy and statements are socialist.  He just can’t carry all that out because congress opposes it and the American people find it repellant.

  • Anonymous

    I guess they got bored with racist/nazi/hitler etc. 

    Liberal definition of a terrorist: one who uses existing legal channels and peaceful protest to achieve results they don’t approve of.

    ELF burns a car dealership down: not terrorism because the cause is just.

    Americans vote a way they don’t like: OMG TERRORISM!!

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/OZBTYQK5MN5SKP6FA6KK4TJOQ4 MichaelAlan

      Don’t for get “unhinged”.

  • TeaPartyNation

    Politico Op-Ed: TEA Partiers Are Terrorists

    Interesting – it’s similar to terms used by the British against the
    American patriots in the Revolutionary War – and that’s NOT a
    coincidence.

  • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

    When your enemies start to shriek and froth at the mouth waving their arms around wildly, you’re winning the debate.

  • Pingback: Daily Dive 31 July 11 | adeliemanchot

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info