Home | About Us | Writers | Contact Us
Search

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Permalinks
10 Questions for 9/11 Truthers
Written By : John Hawkins

You can’t reason someone out of something that he didn’t get into by using reason in the first place. That’s why it’s so difficult to refute conspiracy theories with logic. This is especially relevant given the way that conspiracies spread in the Internet age.

It starts out with a cuckoo theory promoted by crazy people and integrity-free professional con men who pump every conspiracy that comes down the line. The crazy people push the conspiracy theory because they’re paranoid and don’t understand how the world works while the sleazy hucksters promote it because conspiracies sell on the web. Eventually, as the conspiracy starts to draw a crowd, more imitators pop up and the crazies and flimflam men create a vast web of references to each other.

Meanwhile, the people who know better generally ignore the topic altogether because they don’t want to draw attention to it. Unfortunately, that tactic doesn’t work anymore. In the bad old days when there were only a few mainstream “gatekeepers” who controlled the flow of information to the public, it could be successful, but it’s a non-functional strategy in the age of New Media.

So, when the average person starts to research a conspiracy theory on the Internet, he finds an endless array of conspiracy websites, all linking back and forth, while the doubters largely remain on the sidelines. After seeing only one side of the story, many people who don’t know any better conclude, “Well, I GUESS this could be real.” Next thing you know, 35% of Democrats think George W. Bush was involved in the 9/11 attacks and another 26% aren’t sure.

One thing that most people seem to miss is that these conspiracy theorists almost NEVER present any sort of coherent theory. They just ask questions, point out discrepancies, and demand that every single bit of uncertainty be answered to their satisfaction or else, the conspiracy MUST BE true. This is, of course, perfectly ridiculous. No matter what the subject is, there are always disagreements, loose ends, and questions that remain unanswered.

Just to prove that point while I give the Truthers a taste of their own medicine, here are ten questions about the 9/11 conspiracy theories. The next time someone asks you wacky question about the “government conspiracy” behind 9/11, hit him back with a question. Granted, it won’t change his mind if he’s a kook, but you just might reach a few of the casual conspiracists who haven’t fully embraced the crazy yet.

1) If the United States government was actually behind 9/11, hundreds, thousands, and maybe even ten thousands of people would have to be involved. Do you really believe that many Americans would stay quiet about the murder of 3,000 citizens by our own government?

2) Some Truthers believe a car bomb or a missile hit the Pentagon instead of a plane. So how do they explain the witnesses, like James Robbins, who saw a plane hit the Pentagon?

3) If neither the WTC nor the Pentagon was hit by a plane (and, yes, there are Truthers who believe that), what happened to all the people on the planes?

4) Osama Bin Laden publicly admitted that Al-Qaeda was behind the attacks. How do you explain that if our own government is really behind the attacks?

5) “The 9/11 attacks, or at least parts of those attacks, have been investigated by the 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, (and) the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.” None of these groups concluded the U.S. government was behind the attacks. So, were they all in on it or are they simply not privy to the same inside information that Alex Jones has?

6) Bizarrely, despite the fact that the WTC was hit by planes, many Truthers claim the buildings were brought down by controlled demolitions. How in the world could that be done without people in the buildings noticing it? Why in the world would they wire the buildings with explosives and THEN fly planes into the buildings? It’s not as if terrorists hadn’t ever tried to bring down a building with bombs before.

7) Certainly if there was a government conspiracy to target the WTC and Pentagon, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld would have been involved. Would he really have arranged for a plane (or alternately, depending on how loopy you are, a missile or a car bomb) to be used on the Pentagon while he and undoubtedly his friends and staff, were there?

8) If the Bush Administration was actually behind 9/11, how do you explain the fact that they didn’t fake discovering weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? After all, if they were so corrupt that they’d be willing to kill 3000 Americans, surely they wouldn’t have any qualms about planting a few WMDs in Iraq.

9) What exactly is the Bush Administration’s motive for engineering an attack on Afghanistan supposed to be? Militarily, that was considered to be a high risk, low reward country to invade. If it were just about “popularity” (and historically, that’s a very iffy proposition), why not claim that a closer, easier target like Cuba was responsible?

10) If the Bush Administration was really behind 9/11, then surely the Obama Administration must be aware of it by now and they’d have every incentive to reveal it in order to damage the Republican Party. Why haven’t they done it? Are they in on it, too?

0
  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • D-Vega makes StanW cry daily

    That’s a pretty good column.

    One correction, the poll doesn’t say 35% of Democrats say bush was involved in the attacks, it says 35% of Democrats say Bush knew about the attacks in advance.

    That could mean a conspiracy, but it could also mean that he knew the attacks were coming and did nothing, which is incompetence.

  • Anonymous

    **GOLF CLAP**

    Thou hast laineth the smack down on their candy-arses.

  • Anonymous

    **GOLF CLAP**

    Thou hast laineth the smack down on their candy-arses.

  • Anonymous

    **GOLF CLAP**

    Thou hast laineth the smack down on their candy-arses.

  • Anonymous

    **GOLF CLAP**

    Thou hast laineth the smack down on their candy-arses.

  • Anonymous

    **GOLF CLAP**

    Thou hast laineth the smack down on their candy-arses.

  • Anonymous

    **GOLF CLAP**

    Thou hast laineth the smack down on their candy-arses.

  • Hologram5

    I still don’t buy the official story. 19 dudes coming from living in mud huts came over and pulled off the biggest terrorist act in history without some sort of official assistance? I don’t think our own gov’t was involved in killing their own but there is one country that has much to gain by us going in and destabilizing the ME….

  • Hologram5

    I still don’t buy the official story. 19 dudes coming from living in mud huts came over and pulled off the biggest terrorist act in history without some sort of official assistance? I don’t think our own gov’t was involved in killing their own but there is one country that has much to gain by us going in and destabilizing the ME….

  • Hologram5

    I still don’t buy the official story. 19 dudes coming from living in mud huts came over and pulled off the biggest terrorist act in history without some sort of official assistance? I don’t think our own gov’t was involved in killing their own but there is one country that has much to gain by us going in and destabilizing the ME….

  • Anonymous

    This actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it. Wow.

    http://www.being-anon.int.tc

  • Anonymous

    This actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it. Wow.

    http://www.being-anon.int.tc

  • Anonymous

    This actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it. Wow.

    http://www.being-anon.int.tc

  • Anonymous

    This actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it. Wow.

    http://www.being-anon.int.tc

  • Anonymous

    This actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it. Wow.

    http://www.being-anon.int.tc

  • Anonymous

    This actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it. Wow.

    http://www.being-anon.int.tc

  • Anonymous

    This actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it. Wow.

    http://www.being-anon.int.tc

  • Anonymous

    This actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it. Wow.

    http://www.being-anon.int.tc

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://profiles.google.com/td80rice Tyler Dunkelberger

    seems like you need to think outside the box a little bit

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rick-Loveless/669252672 Rick Loveless

    If a plane really did hit the pentagon then why isn’t the hole much larger? A boeing is much, much larger than the hole left behind.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rick-Loveless/669252672 Rick Loveless

    If a plane really did hit the pentagon then why isn’t the hole much larger? A boeing is much, much larger than the hole left behind.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rick-Loveless/669252672 Rick Loveless

    If a plane really did hit the pentagon then why isn’t the hole much larger? A boeing is much, much larger than the hole left behind.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rick-Loveless/669252672 Rick Loveless

    If a plane really did hit the pentagon then why isn’t the hole much larger? A boeing is much, much larger than the hole left behind.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=514612276 Greg Graham

    It was most likley a mossad opperation

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_67FRFUOKFALHXLKBIUWWHSEULE zack

    Here’s one question to you. How did building 7 of the WTC fall?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_67FRFUOKFALHXLKBIUWWHSEULE zack

    Here’s one question to you. How did building 7 of the WTC fall?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_67FRFUOKFALHXLKBIUWWHSEULE zack

    Here’s one question to you. How did building 7 of the WTC fall?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_67FRFUOKFALHXLKBIUWWHSEULE zack

    Here’s one question to you. How did building 7 of the WTC fall?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_67FRFUOKFALHXLKBIUWWHSEULE zack

    Here’s one question to you. How did building 7 of the WTC fall?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_67FRFUOKFALHXLKBIUWWHSEULE zack

    Here’s one question to you. How did building 7 of the WTC fall?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_67FRFUOKFALHXLKBIUWWHSEULE zack

    Here’s one question to you. How did building 7 of the WTC fall?

  • Pingback: === popurls.com === popular today

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Lilienthal/733194866 Mike Lilienthal

    RE:

    1) We’ve done this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Effects_on_U.S._veterans

    2) Does that eye witness have any credible evidence? If you use a witness to refute a claim, then their evidence must be more credible than the folks you’re refuting.

    3) Of coarse they were hit by damn planes. To be fair, some truthers feel that the pentagon was hit by a missile… but realistically, the pentagon is built quite poorly. A missile would have done far more damage.

    4) People can easily lie :) It doesn’t help that Mr. Bin Laden has a long and well-etched history with the bushes.

    5) Once again, our gov’t is loathe to legitimately investigate itself. Please refer to “1″ above.

    6) People did notice it. There are several documented reports of a previously unscheduled, “urgent maintenance” that was magically required days before it happened. Apparently, despite being urgent, none of the actual people who managed maintenance for the WTC knew what required said repairs, or why.

    Furthermore, in order for the story to be believable… it would have to appear to be believable. But a counterfeit is still a counterfeit, no matter how you slice it.

    7) Absolutely. While the pentagon was built like crap, it does have one very interesting feature: Anything that happens on one of the five sides of the building, lest it happens almost directly on a corner, *stays* on that side of the building.

    Force distribution: It’s the magic of architecture with more than 4 sides.

    8) Blowing our own buildings up is one thing. Smuggling nukes through several countries undetected is another. There are nations with entire government branches dedicated to knowing whether or not there’s nuclear material or arms going anywhere. Specifically, Russia… who happened to have several agents *in our government* for quite a while. Simply put, we couldn’t risk it… as the illusion would be ruined.

    9) Specifically it’s about money, and making sure the people who have it still have it after things go down. Oddly enough, Mr. Bushes Wall Street and Big Oil friends also happened to be the same folks to retain their wealth after the financial system decided to keel over. Funny coincidence.

    10) To be as candid as possible: It’s all the same shit show. Everyone is playing on the same team; It’s just a wonderful act on a very large stage to provide the visage of true drama, struggle, and dispute.

    In reality, it’s no different than watching WWE, UFC, Jersey Shore, or a myriad of any other shows that attempt to capitalize on the same premise.

    To sum up: There are no coincidences, as the logic of sequential reasoning clearly disproves (e.g. all events that occur happen because of the event that occured prior). To this end, one only needs to apply simple logic to determine that if something looks, smells, and sounds like a tremendous load of shit, it probably is.

  • Anonymous

    That was a pretty sad attempt at “showing the people” right from wrong.

    #1. You’d be surprised what a government can keep quiet. Do you really think they’ve disclosed everything to the public? Nope. Money goes a looooong way my friend. Here Johnny, take a cool million to keep your mouth shut.

    #2. Again, here Mr. Robbins, here’s a cool million to say what we want you to say.

    This shit is elementary. Quit being so naive. Don’t believe everything you hear/see on TV.

    #3. Perhaps, and this is a real long shot… but perhaps, there were no people on the planes *GASP*. Yes, it’s actually that simple.

    #4. Hey, if Osama wants to take credit for it, why stop him. Here Osama, here’s another 10 million to take credit for the attacks. We’ll just pretend like we’re looking for you for the next 10 years, but we actually won’t. *WINK* *WINK*

    I could go on and on… as could anybody.

    A building, as well as anything else that follows common principles of the matter, will fall/travel via the point of least resistance. There’s no two ways around it. For these buildings to have imploded and fallen directly into themselves is a joke.

    And don’t tell me it’s because everything was completely melted below/gutted by the fires, because they would have needed to burn for much, much longer than that. Plus, there is footage a firefighters climbing the stairs seconds before the collapse. Seems things weren’t so gutted after all.

    For all three buildings that collapsed to have fallen directly to the ground in the fashion they did, and none of them to have fallen outwards/sideways, etc., is nuts.

    Go watch footage of a building being imploded, and then watch footage of a building actually falling without controlled demolition. Then watch the collapse of all 3 building in NY.

    No other building in history has collapsed due to fire. And yes, there was jet fuel in that fire, but that will burn off and the temperature will compensate.

    Come on guys… all three buildings imploding on themselves?? Get your heads together.

    • Anonymous

      No other building in history has collaped because of fire. How many buildings in history have been hit by planes? And all those buildings that collapse so neatly during there demolition are wired with thousands of cables that allow the building to callapse the way they do. They are also wired with tonnes of explosives. the workforce for this would require hundreds of people working the site for weeks leading up to 9/11. I suppose none noticed the huge cables and wires around the place in the tallest building in the world, or were their secret aliens that invisibly cloak themselves, wow another theory you can spread, see its easy to make stuff up. You probably believe the bit about the aliens.

  • Anonymous

    That was a pretty sad attempt at “showing the people” right from wrong.

    #1. You’d be surprised what a government can keep quiet. Do you really think they’ve disclosed everything to the public? Nope. Money goes a looooong way my friend. Here Johnny, take a cool million to keep your mouth shut.

    #2. Again, here Mr. Robbins, here’s a cool million to say what we want you to say.

    This shit is elementary. Quit being so naive. Don’t believe everything you hear/see on TV.

    #3. Perhaps, and this is a real long shot… but perhaps, there were no people on the planes *GASP*. Yes, it’s actually that simple.

    #4. Hey, if Osama wants to take credit for it, why stop him. Here Osama, here’s another 10 million to take credit for the attacks. We’ll just pretend like we’re looking for you for the next 10 years, but we actually won’t. *WINK* *WINK*

    I could go on and on… as could anybody.

    A building, as well as anything else that follows common principles of the matter, will fall/travel via the point of least resistance. There’s no two ways around it. For these buildings to have imploded and fallen directly into themselves is a joke.

    And don’t tell me it’s because everything was completely melted below/gutted by the fires, because they would have needed to burn for much, much longer than that. Plus, there is footage a firefighters climbing the stairs seconds before the collapse. Seems things weren’t so gutted after all.

    For all three buildings that collapsed to have fallen directly to the ground in the fashion they did, and none of them to have fallen outwards/sideways, etc., is nuts.

    Go watch footage of a building being imploded, and then watch footage of a building actually falling without controlled demolition. Then watch the collapse of all 3 building in NY.

    No other building in history has collapsed due to fire. And yes, there was jet fuel in that fire, but that will burn off and the temperature will compensate.

    Come on guys… all three buildings imploding on themselves?? Get your heads together.

  • Anonymous

    That was a pretty sad attempt at “showing the people” right from wrong.

    #1. You’d be surprised what a government can keep quiet. Do you really think they’ve disclosed everything to the public? Nope. Money goes a looooong way my friend. Here Johnny, take a cool million to keep your mouth shut.

    #2. Again, here Mr. Robbins, here’s a cool million to say what we want you to say.

    This shit is elementary. Quit being so naive. Don’t believe everything you hear/see on TV.

    #3. Perhaps, and this is a real long shot… but perhaps, there were no people on the planes *GASP*. Yes, it’s actually that simple.

    #4. Hey, if Osama wants to take credit for it, why stop him. Here Osama, here’s another 10 million to take credit for the attacks. We’ll just pretend like we’re looking for you for the next 10 years, but we actually won’t. *WINK* *WINK*

    I could go on and on… as could anybody.

    A building, as well as anything else that follows common principles of the matter, will fall/travel via the point of least resistance. There’s no two ways around it. For these buildings to have imploded and fallen directly into themselves is a joke.

    And don’t tell me it’s because everything was completely melted below/gutted by the fires, because they would have needed to burn for much, much longer than that. Plus, there is footage a firefighters climbing the stairs seconds before the collapse. Seems things weren’t so gutted after all.

    For all three buildings that collapsed to have fallen directly to the ground in the fashion they did, and none of them to have fallen outwards/sideways, etc., is nuts.

    Go watch footage of a building being imploded, and then watch footage of a building actually falling without controlled demolition. Then watch the collapse of all 3 building in NY.

    No other building in history has collapsed due to fire. And yes, there was jet fuel in that fire, but that will burn off and the temperature will compensate.

    Come on guys… all three buildings imploding on themselves?? Get your heads together.

  • Anonymous

    That was a pretty sad attempt at “showing the people” right from wrong.

    #1. You’d be surprised what a government can keep quiet. Do you really think they’ve disclosed everything to the public? Nope. Money goes a looooong way my friend. Here Johnny, take a cool million to keep your mouth shut.

    #2. Again, here Mr. Robbins, here’s a cool million to say what we want you to say.

    This shit is elementary. Quit being so naive. Don’t believe everything you hear/see on TV.

    #3. Perhaps, and this is a real long shot… but perhaps, there were no people on the planes *GASP*. Yes, it’s actually that simple.

    #4. Hey, if Osama wants to take credit for it, why stop him. Here Osama, here’s another 10 million to take credit for the attacks. We’ll just pretend like we’re looking for you for the next 10 years, but we actually won’t. *WINK* *WINK*

    I could go on and on… as could anybody.

    A building, as well as anything else that follows common principles of the matter, will fall/travel via the point of least resistance. There’s no two ways around it. For these buildings to have imploded and fallen directly into themselves is a joke.

    And don’t tell me it’s because everything was completely melted below/gutted by the fires, because they would have needed to burn for much, much longer than that. Plus, there is footage a firefighters climbing the stairs seconds before the collapse. Seems things weren’t so gutted after all.

    For all three buildings that collapsed to have fallen directly to the ground in the fashion they did, and none of them to have fallen outwards/sideways, etc., is nuts.

    Go watch footage of a building being imploded, and then watch footage of a building actually falling without controlled demolition. Then watch the collapse of all 3 building in NY.

    No other building in history has collapsed due to fire. And yes, there was jet fuel in that fire, but that will burn off and the temperature will compensate.

    Come on guys… all three buildings imploding on themselves?? Get your heads together.

  • Anonymous

    That was a pretty sad attempt at “showing the people” right from wrong.

    #1. You’d be surprised what a government can keep quiet. Do you really think they’ve disclosed everything to the public? Nope. Money goes a looooong way my friend. Here Johnny, take a cool million to keep your mouth shut.

    #2. Again, here Mr. Robbins, here’s a cool million to say what we want you to say.

    This shit is elementary. Quit being so naive. Don’t believe everything you hear/see on TV.

    #3. Perhaps, and this is a real long shot… but perhaps, there were no people on the planes *GASP*. Yes, it’s actually that simple.

    #4. Hey, if Osama wants to take credit for it, why stop him. Here Osama, here’s another 10 million to take credit for the attacks. We’ll just pretend like we’re looking for you for the next 10 years, but we actually won’t. *WINK* *WINK*

    I could go on and on… as could anybody.

    A building, as well as anything else that follows common principles of the matter, will fall/travel via the point of least resistance. There’s no two ways around it. For these buildings to have imploded and fallen directly into themselves is a joke.

    And don’t tell me it’s because everything was completely melted below/gutted by the fires, because they would have needed to burn for much, much longer than that. Plus, there is footage a firefighters climbing the stairs seconds before the collapse. Seems things weren’t so gutted after all.

    For all three buildings that collapsed to have fallen directly to the ground in the fashion they did, and none of them to have fallen outwards/sideways, etc., is nuts.

    Go watch footage of a building being imploded, and then watch footage of a building actually falling without controlled demolition. Then watch the collapse of all 3 building in NY.

    No other building in history has collapsed due to fire. And yes, there was jet fuel in that fire, but that will burn off and the temperature will compensate.

    Come on guys… all three buildings imploding on themselves?? Get your heads together.

  • Anonymous

    That was a pretty sad attempt at “showing the people” right from wrong.

    #1. You’d be surprised what a government can keep quiet. Do you really think they’ve disclosed everything to the public? Nope. Money goes a looooong way my friend. Here Johnny, take a cool million to keep your mouth shut.

    #2. Again, here Mr. Robbins, here’s a cool million to say what we want you to say.

    This shit is elementary. Quit being so naive. Don’t believe everything you hear/see on TV.

    #3. Perhaps, and this is a real long shot… but perhaps, there were no people on the planes *GASP*. Yes, it’s actually that simple.

    #4. Hey, if Osama wants to take credit for it, why stop him. Here Osama, here’s another 10 million to take credit for the attacks. We’ll just pretend like we’re looking for you for the next 10 years, but we actually won’t. *WINK* *WINK*

    I could go on and on… as could anybody.

    A building, as well as anything else that follows common principles of the matter, will fall/travel via the point of least resistance. There’s no two ways around it. For these buildings to have imploded and fallen directly into themselves is a joke.

    And don’t tell me it’s because everything was completely melted below/gutted by the fires, because they would have needed to burn for much, much longer than that. Plus, there is footage a firefighters climbing the stairs seconds before the collapse. Seems things weren’t so gutted after all.

    For all three buildings that collapsed to have fallen directly to the ground in the fashion they did, and none of them to have fallen outwards/sideways, etc., is nuts.

    Go watch footage of a building being imploded, and then watch footage of a building actually falling without controlled demolition. Then watch the collapse of all 3 building in NY.

    No other building in history has collapsed due to fire. And yes, there was jet fuel in that fire, but that will burn off and the temperature will compensate.

    Come on guys… all three buildings imploding on themselves?? Get your heads together.

  • Anonymous

    That was a pretty sad attempt at “showing the people” right from wrong.

    #1. You’d be surprised what a government can keep quiet. Do you really think they’ve disclosed everything to the public? Nope. Money goes a looooong way my friend. Here Johnny, take a cool million to keep your mouth shut.

    #2. Again, here Mr. Robbins, here’s a cool million to say what we want you to say.

    This shit is elementary. Quit being so naive. Don’t believe everything you hear/see on TV.

    #3. Perhaps, and this is a real long shot… but perhaps, there were no people on the planes *GASP*. Yes, it’s actually that simple.

    #4. Hey, if Osama wants to take credit for it, why stop him. Here Osama, here’s another 10 million to take credit for the attacks. We’ll just pretend like we’re looking for you for the next 10 years, but we actually won’t. *WINK* *WINK*

    I could go on and on… as could anybody.

    A building, as well as anything else that follows common principles of the matter, will fall/travel via the point of least resistance. There’s no two ways around it. For these buildings to have imploded and fallen directly into themselves is a joke.

    And don’t tell me it’s because everything was completely melted below/gutted by the fires, because they would have needed to burn for much, much longer than that. Plus, there is footage a firefighters climbing the stairs seconds before the collapse. Seems things weren’t so gutted after all.

    For all three buildings that collapsed to have fallen directly to the ground in the fashion they did, and none of them to have fallen outwards/sideways, etc., is nuts.

    Go watch footage of a building being imploded, and then watch footage of a building actually falling without controlled demolition. Then watch the collapse of all 3 building in NY.

    No other building in history has collapsed due to fire. And yes, there was jet fuel in that fire, but that will burn off and the temperature will compensate.

    Come on guys… all three buildings imploding on themselves?? Get your heads together.

  • Anonymous

    That was a pretty sad attempt at “showing the people” right from wrong.

    #1. You’d be surprised what a government can keep quiet. Do you really think they’ve disclosed everything to the public? Nope. Money goes a looooong way my friend. Here Johnny, take a cool million to keep your mouth shut.

    #2. Again, here Mr. Robbins, here’s a cool million to say what we want you to say.

    This shit is elementary. Quit being so naive. Don’t believe everything you hear/see on TV.

    #3. Perhaps, and this is a real long shot… but perhaps, there were no people on the planes *GASP*. Yes, it’s actually that simple.

    #4. Hey, if Osama wants to take credit for it, why stop him. Here Osama, here’s another 10 million to take credit for the attacks. We’ll just pretend like we’re looking for you for the next 10 years, but we actually won’t. *WINK* *WINK*

    I could go on and on… as could anybody.

    A building, as well as anything else that follows common principles of the matter, will fall/travel via the point of least resistance. There’s no two ways around it. For these buildings to have imploded and fallen directly into themselves is a joke.

    And don’t tell me it’s because everything was completely melted below/gutted by the fires, because they would have needed to burn for much, much longer than that. Plus, there is footage a firefighters climbing the stairs seconds before the collapse. Seems things weren’t so gutted after all.

    For all three buildings that collapsed to have fallen directly to the ground in the fashion they did, and none of them to have fallen outwards/sideways, etc., is nuts.

    Go watch footage of a building being imploded, and then watch footage of a building actually falling without controlled demolition. Then watch the collapse of all 3 building in NY.

    No other building in history has collapsed due to fire. And yes, there was jet fuel in that fire, but that will burn off and the temperature will compensate.

    Come on guys… all three buildings imploding on themselves?? Get your heads together.

  • Anonymous

    That was a pretty sad attempt at “showing the people” right from wrong.

    #1. You’d be surprised what a government can keep quiet. Do you really think they’ve disclosed everything to the public? Nope. Money goes a looooong way my friend. Here Johnny, take a cool million to keep your mouth shut.

    #2. Again, here Mr. Robbins, here’s a cool million to say what we want you to say.

    This shit is elementary. Quit being so naive. Don’t believe everything you hear/see on TV.

    #3. Perhaps, and this is a real long shot… but perhaps, there were no people on the planes *GASP*. Yes, it’s actually that simple.

    #4. Hey, if Osama wants to take credit for it, why stop him. Here Osama, here’s another 10 million to take credit for the attacks. We’ll just pretend like we’re looking for you for the next 10 years, but we actually won’t. *WINK* *WINK*

    I could go on and on… as could anybody.

    A building, as well as anything else that follows common principles of the matter, will fall/travel via the point of least resistance. There’s no two ways around it. For these buildings to have imploded and fallen directly into themselves is a joke.

    And don’t tell me it’s because everything was completely melted below/gutted by the fires, because they would have needed to burn for much, much longer than that. Plus, there is footage a firefighters climbing the stairs seconds before the collapse. Seems things weren’t so gutted after all.

    For all three buildings that collapsed to have fallen directly to the ground in the fashion they did, and none of them to have fallen outwards/sideways, etc., is nuts.

    Go watch footage of a building being imploded, and then watch footage of a building actually falling without controlled demolition. Then watch the collapse of all 3 building in NY.

    No other building in history has collapsed due to fire. And yes, there was jet fuel in that fire, but that will burn off and the temperature will compensate.

    Come on guys… all three buildings imploding on themselves?? Get your heads together.

  • Anonymous

    That was a pretty sad attempt at “showing the people” right from wrong.

    #1. You’d be surprised what a government can keep quiet. Do you really think they’ve disclosed everything to the public? Nope. Money goes a looooong way my friend. Here Johnny, take a cool million to keep your mouth shut.

    #2. Again, here Mr. Robbins, here’s a cool million to say what we want you to say.

    This shit is elementary. Quit being so naive. Don’t believe everything you hear/see on TV.

    #3. Perhaps, and this is a real long shot… but perhaps, there were no people on the planes *GASP*. Yes, it’s actually that simple.

    #4. Hey, if Osama wants to take credit for it, why stop him. Here Osama, here’s another 10 million to take credit for the attacks. We’ll just pretend like we’re looking for you for the next 10 years, but we actually won’t. *WINK* *WINK*

    I could go on and on… as could anybody.

    A building, as well as anything else that follows common principles of the matter, will fall/travel via the point of least resistance. There’s no two ways around it. For these buildings to have imploded and fallen directly into themselves is a joke.

    And don’t tell me it’s because everything was completely melted below/gutted by the fires, because they would have needed to burn for much, much longer than that. Plus, there is footage a firefighters climbing the stairs seconds before the collapse. Seems things weren’t so gutted after all.

    For all three buildings that collapsed to have fallen directly to the ground in the fashion they did, and none of them to have fallen outwards/sideways, etc., is nuts.

    Go watch footage of a building being imploded, and then watch footage of a building actually falling without controlled demolition. Then watch the collapse of all 3 building in NY.

    No other building in history has collapsed due to fire. And yes, there was jet fuel in that fire, but that will burn off and the temperature will compensate.

    Come on guys… all three buildings imploding on themselves?? Get your heads together.

  • Anonymous

    That was a pretty sad attempt at “showing the people” right from wrong.

    #1. You’d be surprised what a government can keep quiet. Do you really think they’ve disclosed everything to the public? Nope. Money goes a looooong way my friend. Here Johnny, take a cool million to keep your mouth shut.

    #2. Again, here Mr. Robbins, here’s a cool million to say what we want you to say.

    This shit is elementary. Quit being so naive. Don’t believe everything you hear/see on TV.

    #3. Perhaps, and this is a real long shot… but perhaps, there were no people on the planes *GASP*. Yes, it’s actually that simple.

    #4. Hey, if Osama wants to take credit for it, why stop him. Here Osama, here’s another 10 million to take credit for the attacks. We’ll just pretend like we’re looking for you for the next 10 years, but we actually won’t. *WINK* *WINK*

    I could go on and on… as could anybody.

    A building, as well as anything else that follows common principles of the matter, will fall/travel via the point of least resistance. There’s no two ways around it. For these buildings to have imploded and fallen directly into themselves is a joke.

    And don’t tell me it’s because everything was completely melted below/gutted by the fires, because they would have needed to burn for much, much longer than that. Plus, there is footage a firefighters climbing the stairs seconds before the collapse. Seems things weren’t so gutted after all.

    For all three buildings that collapsed to have fallen directly to the ground in the fashion they did, and none of them to have fallen outwards/sideways, etc., is nuts.

    Go watch footage of a building being imploded, and then watch footage of a building actually falling without controlled demolition. Then watch the collapse of all 3 building in NY.

    No other building in history has collapsed due to fire. And yes, there was jet fuel in that fire, but that will burn off and the temperature will compensate.

    Come on guys… all three buildings imploding on themselves?? Get your heads together.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ben.raines Ben R

    I loved the first two-three paragraphs. They set up a clear, reasoned explanation of one of the real problems in this great country as we move into an internet age and the 24 hour news cylce. What is interesting is that they apply equally well to the birther’s and the creationists. This is not a problem only on the left or the right. It is instead a serious problem for a country which lacks critical thinking skills. Questions are not a bad thing, but once answered… people need to learn to move on. Doubt and questions do not equal disproof. Innuendo and supposition do not equal truth.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1544190195 Jonathan Morales

    Alright I will answer your questions if you answer ours
    1.Yes I believe that our government would take out 3000 people just look at the epa raising the amounts of radiation to safe levels.
    2.If there are so many people who saw the plane hit the pentagon where are the videos?
    3.Our government could have easily blown the planes out of the sky and replaced them with empty planes/ where are the flight recorders?
    4.Why wouldn’t a terror organization not take advantage of a attack if they had the chance to. They would lose nothing in doing so.
    5.First off your number five is just funny. Everybody knows they could have stopped the planes if they wanted to but they let them hit the trade center.
    6. Have you watched any other building go down like that after an attack, and what about WT7 how did it go down. There are plenty of reports that say that there were renovations in the building before attacks, where explosives could have been planted.
    7.The “plane” or whatever hit the pentagon was dropped from the news the same day I still remember them not going into detail on it very much from that day. No one was hurt in that explosion…no one important anyways.
    8.Why didn’t we find any WMDs?Because the 9/11 attacks were used a false flag to go into Iraq to find the WMD’s.
    9.What about all the defense contracts from Halliburton,KBR, and Blackwater, Blackwater or whatever their new name is is still running IRAQ.
    10.Why would our government admit that they killed 3000 people.

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    BTW , we didn’t find weapons of mass destruction dumbass , but we still invaded iraq , get ur facts right before u try and make me change my mind , idiot , u probably were persuaded by the government ti make this article , maybe try and think on your own , and not be told what to think , you fucking robot ……

  • Anonymous

    Your an idiot.

  • http://profiles.google.com/liftedway0flife Christian Pedroza

    Sorry Jon but all your explanations are far fetched and can all be countered with what Dirt Hammer has said. Although I do believe George Bush did NOT know about this, but the CIA is another story. In the 1960′s the CIA came up with plans to “use airliners to deliberately crash into skyscrapers in order for the people of the US to think it was Communist Cuba trying to invade them and to in return use it as a justifiable reason to invade Cuba.” And just like Dirt Hammer said money talks its way too easy for them to hand out millions to keep your mouth shut..welcome to the Fascist States of America

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WQ54LRQEPVQPIH45HJFO5Q43RQ D O

    1. The government wasnt behind the attacks, but were complicit in it. Being as how the towers were filled with asbestos, which would have cost nearly a trillion dollars to abate, this was by far the more profitable option. The government is on the side of the rich, so for the right amount, it can look away, and it doesn’t take many people to ignore warning signs at the upper echelons of the government.

    2. “Witnesses” are easily paid off, and there are equally as many witnesses who attest to things both at the WTC site and Pentagon site not adding up to what the government reports claim.

    3. Do you actually know anyone who was on the plane? The idea (that some people may believe) that they weren’t hit by planes is, admittedly, somewhat ridiculous. But the fact that they were hit by planes has nothing to do with who planned for them to be, and lends no credence to the idea that “terrorists” hijacked these planes with box-cutters incapable of inflicting much more damage than a paper cut. Would you let a terrorist hijack a plane you were on with a small razor?

    4. Osama admitted to it. That proves they did it! No one would take credit for something they couldn’t actually figure out how to carry out in order to make themselves seem more powerful than they actually are. You’re right, Osama must have done it!

    5. “The 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, (and) the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence” Hmm… what do all of these groups have in common? They are all funded by the government, and the people on these panels and in these groups are all employed or appointed by the government. But that wouldn’t stop them from blaming the people who appoint, employ and pay them! No way! (In fact, members of the 9/11 commission were as unswayed by the idea that “terrorists” carried out 9/11 as they were at the idea that the government did. Many of them, after the fact, would say only that none of the official explanations are even plausible.)

    6. Not only is there evidence that parts of the building were closed down to regular employees the weekend before 9/11, but have you ever heard of maintenance and restricted areas? So, for them to plant a small explosive such as C4, they’d have to put it in plain sight? And people who are working at their menial job are actually on the lookout for and know what C4 or something similar would look like? Are you seriously asking why someone would then fly a plane into the building after wiring it? Why does a murderer cover up his murder? So they can lie about what actually happened! Come on, really? Lets see, in the early 1990s some “terrorist” actually tried to use an explosive to blow up the WTC, and it was a half-assed lame attempt. So they should have just used their highly-advanced, organized explosive scheme and just said “Yeah, the terrorists are WAY more advanced and smarter than they were years ago.” And we’d have bought that. Or maybe YOU would have. They needed the planes to make people like you buy their lame excuse.

    7. So, was Donald Rumsfield at the Pentagon when it was “hit by a plane”? I don’t think so. Oddly enough, no one was actually inside that section of the Pentagon. Hmm…what a coincidence.

    8. Why didn’t they fake WMD in Iraq? Probably because they didn’t need to. The war was already started, the no-bid contracts were already meted out, and they got what they wanted. At that point, they didn’t care what the American people thought, as long as people like you were drinking their juice.

    9. Why blame Afghanistan? Precisely because it is a high risk. They wanted a war that could last indefinitely, and if we invaded Cuba it would have been a relatively easy, short lived fight. They want a war they (i.e. Haliburton) could profit from for years and years to come, which is exactly what they got.

    10. Yes, they are! How are they in on it? Because Republicans and Democrats are exactly the same thing just with different store fronts. It is all the rich trying to stay rich, which is exactly why Obama replaced Bush’s financial-sector people with his own financial-sector people, why Guantanamo is still open, why military tribunals will continue. Political party means nothing, there are larger groups at work that this “two party” nonsense is distracting small minded people like you from. You think anything would be different right now if McCain won? No. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss: The rich power elite, distracting people from what’s really going on with stupid issues like gay marriage and abortion, while they steal every penny they can from the working middle class.

    Wake the hell up, people. Think for yourselves and take the wool from over your eyes before its too late.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WQ54LRQEPVQPIH45HJFO5Q43RQ D O

    1. The government wasnt behind the attacks, but were complicit in it. Being as how the towers were filled with asbestos, which would have cost nearly a trillion dollars to abate, this was by far the more profitable option. The government is on the side of the rich, so for the right amount, it can look away, and it doesn’t take many people to ignore warning signs at the upper echelons of the government.

    2. “Witnesses” are easily paid off, and there are equally as many witnesses who attest to things both at the WTC site and Pentagon site not adding up to what the government reports claim.

    3. Do you actually know anyone who was on the plane? The idea (that some people may believe) that they weren’t hit by planes is, admittedly, somewhat ridiculous. But the fact that they were hit by planes has nothing to do with who planned for them to be, and lends no credence to the idea that “terrorists” hijacked these planes with box-cutters incapable of inflicting much more damage than a paper cut. Would you let a terrorist hijack a plane you were on with a small razor?

    4. Osama admitted to it. That proves they did it! No one would take credit for something they couldn’t actually figure out how to carry out in order to make themselves seem more powerful than they actually are. You’re right, Osama must have done it!

    5. “The 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, (and) the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence” Hmm… what do all of these groups have in common? They are all funded by the government, and the people on these panels and in these groups are all employed or appointed by the government. But that wouldn’t stop them from blaming the people who appoint, employ and pay them! No way! (In fact, members of the 9/11 commission were as unswayed by the idea that “terrorists” carried out 9/11 as they were at the idea that the government did. Many of them, after the fact, would say only that none of the official explanations are even plausible.)

    6. Not only is there evidence that parts of the building were closed down to regular employees the weekend before 9/11, but have you ever heard of maintenance and restricted areas? So, for them to plant a small explosive such as C4, they’d have to put it in plain sight? And people who are working at their menial job are actually on the lookout for and know what C4 or something similar would look like? Are you seriously asking why someone would then fly a plane into the building after wiring it? Why does a murderer cover up his murder? So they can lie about what actually happened! Come on, really? Lets see, in the early 1990s some “terrorist” actually tried to use an explosive to blow up the WTC, and it was a half-assed lame attempt. So they should have just used their highly-advanced, organized explosive scheme and just said “Yeah, the terrorists are WAY more advanced and smarter than they were years ago.” And we’d have bought that. Or maybe YOU would have. They needed the planes to make people like you buy their lame excuse.

    7. So, was Donald Rumsfield at the Pentagon when it was “hit by a plane”? I don’t think so. Oddly enough, no one was actually inside that section of the Pentagon. Hmm…what a coincidence.

    8. Why didn’t they fake WMD in Iraq? Probably because they didn’t need to. The war was already started, the no-bid contracts were already meted out, and they got what they wanted. At that point, they didn’t care what the American people thought, as long as people like you were drinking their juice.

    9. Why blame Afghanistan? Precisely because it is a high risk. They wanted a war that could last indefinitely, and if we invaded Cuba it would have been a relatively easy, short lived fight. They want a war they (i.e. Haliburton) could profit from for years and years to come, which is exactly what they got.

    10. Yes, they are! How are they in on it? Because Republicans and Democrats are exactly the same thing just with different store fronts. It is all the rich trying to stay rich, which is exactly why Obama replaced Bush’s financial-sector people with his own financial-sector people, why Guantanamo is still open, why military tribunals will continue. Political party means nothing, there are larger groups at work that this “two party” nonsense is distracting small minded people like you from. You think anything would be different right now if McCain won? No. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss: The rich power elite, distracting people from what’s really going on with stupid issues like gay marriage and abortion, while they steal every penny they can from the working middle class.

    Wake the hell up, people. Think for yourselves and take the wool from over your eyes before its too late.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WQ54LRQEPVQPIH45HJFO5Q43RQ D O

    1. The government wasnt behind the attacks, but were complicit in it. Being as how the towers were filled with asbestos, which would have cost nearly a trillion dollars to abate, this was by far the more profitable option. The government is on the side of the rich, so for the right amount, it can look away, and it doesn’t take many people to ignore warning signs at the upper echelons of the government.

    2. “Witnesses” are easily paid off, and there are equally as many witnesses who attest to things both at the WTC site and Pentagon site not adding up to what the government reports claim.

    3. Do you actually know anyone who was on the plane? The idea (that some people may believe) that they weren’t hit by planes is, admittedly, somewhat ridiculous. But the fact that they were hit by planes has nothing to do with who planned for them to be, and lends no credence to the idea that “terrorists” hijacked these planes with box-cutters incapable of inflicting much more damage than a paper cut. Would you let a terrorist hijack a plane you were on with a small razor?

    4. Osama admitted to it. That proves they did it! No one would take credit for something they couldn’t actually figure out how to carry out in order to make themselves seem more powerful than they actually are. You’re right, Osama must have done it!

    5. “The 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, (and) the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence” Hmm… what do all of these groups have in common? They are all funded by the government, and the people on these panels and in these groups are all employed or appointed by the government. But that wouldn’t stop them from blaming the people who appoint, employ and pay them! No way! (In fact, members of the 9/11 commission were as unswayed by the idea that “terrorists” carried out 9/11 as they were at the idea that the government did. Many of them, after the fact, would say only that none of the official explanations are even plausible.)

    6. Not only is there evidence that parts of the building were closed down to regular employees the weekend before 9/11, but have you ever heard of maintenance and restricted areas? So, for them to plant a small explosive such as C4, they’d have to put it in plain sight? And people who are working at their menial job are actually on the lookout for and know what C4 or something similar would look like? Are you seriously asking why someone would then fly a plane into the building after wiring it? Why does a murderer cover up his murder? So they can lie about what actually happened! Come on, really? Lets see, in the early 1990s some “terrorist” actually tried to use an explosive to blow up the WTC, and it was a half-assed lame attempt. So they should have just used their highly-advanced, organized explosive scheme and just said “Yeah, the terrorists are WAY more advanced and smarter than they were years ago.” And we’d have bought that. Or maybe YOU would have. They needed the planes to make people like you buy their lame excuse.

    7. So, was Donald Rumsfield at the Pentagon when it was “hit by a plane”? I don’t think so. Oddly enough, no one was actually inside that section of the Pentagon. Hmm…what a coincidence.

    8. Why didn’t they fake WMD in Iraq? Probably because they didn’t need to. The war was already started, the no-bid contracts were already meted out, and they got what they wanted. At that point, they didn’t care what the American people thought, as long as people like you were drinking their juice.

    9. Why blame Afghanistan? Precisely because it is a high risk. They wanted a war that could last indefinitely, and if we invaded Cuba it would have been a relatively easy, short lived fight. They want a war they (i.e. Haliburton) could profit from for years and years to come, which is exactly what they got.

    10. Yes, they are! How are they in on it? Because Republicans and Democrats are exactly the same thing just with different store fronts. It is all the rich trying to stay rich, which is exactly why Obama replaced Bush’s financial-sector people with his own financial-sector people, why Guantanamo is still open, why military tribunals will continue. Political party means nothing, there are larger groups at work that this “two party” nonsense is distracting small minded people like you from. You think anything would be different right now if McCain won? No. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss: The rich power elite, distracting people from what’s really going on with stupid issues like gay marriage and abortion, while they steal every penny they can from the working middle class.

    Wake the hell up, people. Think for yourselves and take the wool from over your eyes before its too late.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WQ54LRQEPVQPIH45HJFO5Q43RQ D O

    1. The government wasnt behind the attacks, but were complicit in it. Being as how the towers were filled with asbestos, which would have cost nearly a trillion dollars to abate, this was by far the more profitable option. The government is on the side of the rich, so for the right amount, it can look away, and it doesn’t take many people to ignore warning signs at the upper echelons of the government.

    2. “Witnesses” are easily paid off, and there are equally as many witnesses who attest to things both at the WTC site and Pentagon site not adding up to what the government reports claim.

    3. Do you actually know anyone who was on the plane? The idea (that some people may believe) that they weren’t hit by planes is, admittedly, somewhat ridiculous. But the fact that they were hit by planes has nothing to do with who planned for them to be, and lends no credence to the idea that “terrorists” hijacked these planes with box-cutters incapable of inflicting much more damage than a paper cut. Would you let a terrorist hijack a plane you were on with a small razor?

    4. Osama admitted to it. That proves they did it! No one would take credit for something they couldn’t actually figure out how to carry out in order to make themselves seem more powerful than they actually are. You’re right, Osama must have done it!

    5. “The 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, (and) the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence” Hmm… what do all of these groups have in common? They are all funded by the government, and the people on these panels and in these groups are all employed or appointed by the government. But that wouldn’t stop them from blaming the people who appoint, employ and pay them! No way! (In fact, members of the 9/11 commission were as unswayed by the idea that “terrorists” carried out 9/11 as they were at the idea that the government did. Many of them, after the fact, would say only that none of the official explanations are even plausible.)

    6. Not only is there evidence that parts of the building were closed down to regular employees the weekend before 9/11, but have you ever heard of maintenance and restricted areas? So, for them to plant a small explosive such as C4, they’d have to put it in plain sight? And people who are working at their menial job are actually on the lookout for and know what C4 or something similar would look like? Are you seriously asking why someone would then fly a plane into the building after wiring it? Why does a murderer cover up his murder? So they can lie about what actually happened! Come on, really? Lets see, in the early 1990s some “terrorist” actually tried to use an explosive to blow up the WTC, and it was a half-assed lame attempt. So they should have just used their highly-advanced, organized explosive scheme and just said “Yeah, the terrorists are WAY more advanced and smarter than they were years ago.” And we’d have bought that. Or maybe YOU would have. They needed the planes to make people like you buy their lame excuse.

    7. So, was Donald Rumsfield at the Pentagon when it was “hit by a plane”? I don’t think so. Oddly enough, no one was actually inside that section of the Pentagon. Hmm…what a coincidence.

    8. Why didn’t they fake WMD in Iraq? Probably because they didn’t need to. The war was already started, the no-bid contracts were already meted out, and they got what they wanted. At that point, they didn’t care what the American people thought, as long as people like you were drinking their juice.

    9. Why blame Afghanistan? Precisely because it is a high risk. They wanted a war that could last indefinitely, and if we invaded Cuba it would have been a relatively easy, short lived fight. They want a war they (i.e. Haliburton) could profit from for years and years to come, which is exactly what they got.

    10. Yes, they are! How are they in on it? Because Republicans and Democrats are exactly the same thing just with different store fronts. It is all the rich trying to stay rich, which is exactly why Obama replaced Bush’s financial-sector people with his own financial-sector people, why Guantanamo is still open, why military tribunals will continue. Political party means nothing, there are larger groups at work that this “two party” nonsense is distracting small minded people like you from. You think anything would be different right now if McCain won? No. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss: The rich power elite, distracting people from what’s really going on with stupid issues like gay marriage and abortion, while they steal every penny they can from the working middle class.

    Wake the hell up, people. Think for yourselves and take the wool from over your eyes before its too late.

  • http://www.facebook.com/hedsic Rick Cowman

    Dude, Someone is still going on about this crap even after the rest of the world stopped giving a damn about debunking the ‘truthers’ and vice versa?
    I take it the author of this was either really drunk or just bored off his ass. or this is a really old article that I am just now seeing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=890715111 James Chard

    The problems with 9/11 are not that the conspiracists are crazy, but that the explanations given by the investigators are not plausible.
    As I understand it, the building could not have fallen down as it did, and there was no aeroplane wreckage found at the Pentagon. Without tangible explanation of these events, conspiracy theories will, quite rightly, never cease.

  • http://trifco.tonidoid.com/app/openid V

    1. Been there done that without thousands involved:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3319663041501647311#

    I’m sure you can find more by yourself

    2. 100 ton airplane full of passengers, luggage and titanium can’t evaporate in few minutes. End of story. At least you would find the engines, since the titanium needs some serious heat to melt, not evaporate.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium

    3. WTC was hit by the planes.
    4. Maybe you should step back and check this first:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/3970901.stm

    Than this: http://www.saintpetersburgtimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml

    Maybe you’ll have some brain to draw a conclusion.

    5. 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA.. are you serious? They are all playing for the same team – NWO.

    From 9/11 rapport: “Whoever funded the terrorist attack of 9/11, it is irrelevant. ” Really? Whey not to follow the money trail?

    6. could one place the shape charges and thermite maybe BEFORE the 9/11?

    http://dailypaul.com/90808/renovations-in-wtc-during-the-year-prior-to-911-now-proven

    7. Can you name some of his personal friends that got killed there? You think people in military care fore each other that much? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_fodder

    8. Because they didn’t have to do that – there are NO consequences for their act. Yes it’s as simple as that.

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26030573/ns/today-today_people/

    9. Again.. just follow the money:
    http://lookfromabove.com/uncategorized/how-invasion-of-afghanistan-worked-for-opium-production

    10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI

    Feel sorry for you John.

  • http://trifco.tonidoid.com/app/openid V

    1. Been there done that without thousands involved:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3319663041501647311#

    I’m sure you can find more by yourself

    2. 100 ton airplane full of passengers, luggage and titanium can’t evaporate in few minutes. End of story. At least you would find the engines, since the titanium needs some serious heat to melt, not evaporate.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium

    3. WTC was hit by the planes.
    4. Maybe you should step back and check this first:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/3970901.stm

    Than this: http://www.saintpetersburgtimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml

    Maybe you’ll have some brain to draw a conclusion.

    5. 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA.. are you serious? They are all playing for the same team – NWO.

    From 9/11 rapport: “Whoever funded the terrorist attack of 9/11, it is irrelevant. ” Really? Whey not to follow the money trail?

    6. could one place the shape charges and thermite maybe BEFORE the 9/11?

    http://dailypaul.com/90808/renovations-in-wtc-during-the-year-prior-to-911-now-proven

    7. Can you name some of his personal friends that got killed there? You think people in military care fore each other that much? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_fodder

    8. Because they didn’t have to do that – there are NO consequences for their act. Yes it’s as simple as that.

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26030573/ns/today-today_people/

    9. Again.. just follow the money:
    http://lookfromabove.com/uncategorized/how-invasion-of-afghanistan-worked-for-opium-production

    10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI

    Feel sorry for you John.

  • http://trifco.tonidoid.com/app/openid V

    1. Been there done that without thousands involved:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3319663041501647311#

    I’m sure you can find more by yourself

    2. 100 ton airplane full of passengers, luggage and titanium can’t evaporate in few minutes. End of story. At least you would find the engines, since the titanium needs some serious heat to melt, not evaporate.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium

    3. WTC was hit by the planes.
    4. Maybe you should step back and check this first:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/3970901.stm

    Than this: http://www.saintpetersburgtimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml

    Maybe you’ll have some brain to draw a conclusion.

    5. 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA.. are you serious? They are all playing for the same team – NWO.

    From 9/11 rapport: “Whoever funded the terrorist attack of 9/11, it is irrelevant. ” Really? Whey not to follow the money trail?

    6. could one place the shape charges and thermite maybe BEFORE the 9/11?

    http://dailypaul.com/90808/renovations-in-wtc-during-the-year-prior-to-911-now-proven

    7. Can you name some of his personal friends that got killed there? You think people in military care fore each other that much? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_fodder

    8. Because they didn’t have to do that – there are NO consequences for their act. Yes it’s as simple as that.

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26030573/ns/today-today_people/

    9. Again.. just follow the money:
    http://lookfromabove.com/uncategorized/how-invasion-of-afghanistan-worked-for-opium-production

    10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI

    Feel sorry for you John.

  • http://trifco.tonidoid.com/app/openid V

    1. Been there done that without thousands involved:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3319663041501647311#

    I’m sure you can find more by yourself

    2. 100 ton airplane full of passengers, luggage and titanium can’t evaporate in few minutes. End of story. At least you would find the engines, since the titanium needs some serious heat to melt, not evaporate.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium

    3. WTC was hit by the planes.
    4. Maybe you should step back and check this first:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/3970901.stm

    Than this: http://www.saintpetersburgtimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml

    Maybe you’ll have some brain to draw a conclusion.

    5. 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA.. are you serious? They are all playing for the same team – NWO.

    From 9/11 rapport: “Whoever funded the terrorist attack of 9/11, it is irrelevant. ” Really? Whey not to follow the money trail?

    6. could one place the shape charges and thermite maybe BEFORE the 9/11?

    http://dailypaul.com/90808/renovations-in-wtc-during-the-year-prior-to-911-now-proven

    7. Can you name some of his personal friends that got killed there? You think people in military care fore each other that much? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_fodder

    8. Because they didn’t have to do that – there are NO consequences for their act. Yes it’s as simple as that.

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26030573/ns/today-today_people/

    9. Again.. just follow the money:
    http://lookfromabove.com/uncategorized/how-invasion-of-afghanistan-worked-for-opium-production

    10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI

    Feel sorry for you John.

  • http://trifco.tonidoid.com/app/openid V

    1. Been there done that without thousands involved:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3319663041501647311#

    I’m sure you can find more by yourself

    2. 100 ton airplane full of passengers, luggage and titanium can’t evaporate in few minutes. End of story. At least you would find the engines, since the titanium needs some serious heat to melt, not evaporate.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium

    3. WTC was hit by the planes.
    4. Maybe you should step back and check this first:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/3970901.stm

    Than this: http://www.saintpetersburgtimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml

    Maybe you’ll have some brain to draw a conclusion.

    5. 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA.. are you serious? They are all playing for the same team – NWO.

    From 9/11 rapport: “Whoever funded the terrorist attack of 9/11, it is irrelevant. ” Really? Whey not to follow the money trail?

    6. could one place the shape charges and thermite maybe BEFORE the 9/11?

    http://dailypaul.com/90808/renovations-in-wtc-during-the-year-prior-to-911-now-proven

    7. Can you name some of his personal friends that got killed there? You think people in military care fore each other that much? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_fodder

    8. Because they didn’t have to do that – there are NO consequences for their act. Yes it’s as simple as that.

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26030573/ns/today-today_people/

    9. Again.. just follow the money:
    http://lookfromabove.com/uncategorized/how-invasion-of-afghanistan-worked-for-opium-production

    10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI

    Feel sorry for you John.

  • http://trifco.tonidoid.com/app/openid V

    1. Been there done that without thousands involved:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3319663041501647311#

    I’m sure you can find more by yourself

    2. 100 ton airplane full of passengers, luggage and titanium can’t evaporate in few minutes. End of story. At least you would find the engines, since the titanium needs some serious heat to melt, not evaporate.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium

    3. WTC was hit by the planes.
    4. Maybe you should step back and check this first:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/3970901.stm

    Than this: http://www.saintpetersburgtimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml

    Maybe you’ll have some brain to draw a conclusion.

    5. 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA.. are you serious? They are all playing for the same team – NWO.

    From 9/11 rapport: “Whoever funded the terrorist attack of 9/11, it is irrelevant. ” Really? Whey not to follow the money trail?

    6. could one place the shape charges and thermite maybe BEFORE the 9/11?

    http://dailypaul.com/90808/renovations-in-wtc-during-the-year-prior-to-911-now-proven

    7. Can you name some of his personal friends that got killed there? You think people in military care fore each other that much? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_fodder

    8. Because they didn’t have to do that – there are NO consequences for their act. Yes it’s as simple as that.

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26030573/ns/today-today_people/

    9. Again.. just follow the money:
    http://lookfromabove.com/uncategorized/how-invasion-of-afghanistan-worked-for-opium-production

    10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI

    Feel sorry for you John.

  • http://trifco.tonidoid.com/app/openid V

    1. Been there done that without thousands involved:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3319663041501647311#

    I’m sure you can find more by yourself

    2. 100 ton airplane full of passengers, luggage and titanium can’t evaporate in few minutes. End of story. At least you would find the engines, since the titanium needs some serious heat to melt, not evaporate.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium

    3. WTC was hit by the planes.
    4. Maybe you should step back and check this first:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/3970901.stm

    Than this: http://www.saintpetersburgtimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml

    Maybe you’ll have some brain to draw a conclusion.

    5. 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA.. are you serious? They are all playing for the same team – NWO.

    From 9/11 rapport: “Whoever funded the terrorist attack of 9/11, it is irrelevant. ” Really? Whey not to follow the money trail?

    6. could one place the shape charges and thermite maybe BEFORE the 9/11?

    http://dailypaul.com/90808/renovations-in-wtc-during-the-year-prior-to-911-now-proven

    7. Can you name some of his personal friends that got killed there? You think people in military care fore each other that much? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_fodder

    8. Because they didn’t have to do that – there are NO consequences for their act. Yes it’s as simple as that.

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26030573/ns/today-today_people/

    9. Again.. just follow the money:
    http://lookfromabove.com/uncategorized/how-invasion-of-afghanistan-worked-for-opium-production

    10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI

    Feel sorry for you John.

  • http://trifco.tonidoid.com/app/openid V

    1. Been there done that without thousands involved:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3319663041501647311#

    I’m sure you can find more by yourself

    2. 100 ton airplane full of passengers, luggage and titanium can’t evaporate in few minutes. End of story. At least you would find the engines, since the titanium needs some serious heat to melt, not evaporate.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium

    3. WTC was hit by the planes.
    4. Maybe you should step back and check this first:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/3970901.stm

    Than this: http://www.saintpetersburgtimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml

    Maybe you’ll have some brain to draw a conclusion.

    5. 9/11 commission, the CIA, FBI, FAA, FEMA.. are you serious? They are all playing for the same team – NWO.

    From 9/11 rapport: “Whoever funded the terrorist attack of 9/11, it is irrelevant. ” Really? Whey not to follow the money trail?

    6. could one place the shape charges and thermite maybe BEFORE the 9/11?

    http://dailypaul.com/90808/renovations-in-wtc-during-the-year-prior-to-911-now-proven

    7. Can you name some of his personal friends that got killed there? You think people in military care fore each other that much? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_fodder

    8. Because they didn’t have to do that – there are NO consequences for their act. Yes it’s as simple as that.

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26030573/ns/today-today_people/

    9. Again.. just follow the money:
    http://lookfromabove.com/uncategorized/how-invasion-of-afghanistan-worked-for-opium-production

    10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI

    Feel sorry for you John.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Reply of a rational dude
    1. Wrong. I love how people assume they actually understand how top secret operations are run because they watched a Matt Damon movie. I won’t make that assumption because I’m not a self righteous douche like you.
    2. “Some truthers” could be saying that an asteroid is heading for the white house and martians will blow it up with a ray gun. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the pentagon is a defense fortress with over 80 cameras. None of the actual videos were released for the public to watch. Why?
    3. Why are you choosing the most extreme “out-there” theories to question. Keep it simple stupid. Do you really think all of this was accomplished without at least a few internal agents or other some help from the “inside?” How did they pick the exact date and know we had war games going on at that exact time so to confuse the military and air control?
    4. If Bin Laden isn’t a double agent, how is it possible we haven’t caught him yet? We catch criminals much less known all over the world everyday.
    5. We all know a government investigating itself isn’t a true investigation. It should have been completely independent. They didn’t ask the real questions, and the CIA and FBI didn’t give them any real answers. What a joke.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • Anonymous

    Most of your “questions” are no better than the crap the truthers spout out. Your only valid questions (AND MY questions) are 1 and 3

    Do I think the US Gov caused 9/11? NO I refuse to believe anyone in power here can be that evil without EVIDENCE. I just can’t accept that.

    but I CAN believe they “knew” it was going to happen and intentionally did nothing to prevent it. maybe not exactly what was going to happen but that SOMETHING would happen involving planes. Maybe they had no idea they were going to CRASH them but they knew something was up.

    There is just too much evidence to suggest that quite a few people “knew” something was coming.

    No cabbies in area
    CAP purposely sent away.
    45 minute delay response time
    Insurance on the buildings just prior
    NO ONE important in those buildings at that time. NO ONE no big wigs no important government/political/commercial individuals were their (nearly NEVER happens in those buildings)
    Stock Trading on the involved airline that morning.

    I am sorry that is just too much coincidence. I don’t believe in coincidence. SOMETHING was going on and people KNEW IT.

    caused it? NO. let it happen? YES. we needed that attack. we needed an excuse for war. Why? just look at the laws and money passed/spent post 9/11 and its clear to understand.

    without 9/11 there would be no patriot act mill com act TSA/DHS Wars in ME etc.. etc… etc…

    SO how about YOU answer some questions. instead of portraying us as the “extremists” truthers who think missiles were used and we orchestrated the whole thing (most of us do NOT believe that) how about a moderate approach.

    YOU tell me the how and why for that list I have above. and all at the same time.???

    I do NOT think we orchestrated it intentionally. I do not think missiles were used. I do not think “explosives” were used to take down the buildings I do not even think any one knew the planes would be used as bombs.

    BUT SOME OF US clearly knew something was going to happen IN NY with airplanes from THAT airline to THOSE buildings in all likelihood and on that morning.

    There is simply too much evidence to ignore it.

    SO here MY 7 questions for 9/11 Deniers.

    Taken as a “whole” in context.

    #1 Why was CAP ordered AWAY from the area JUST prior to attacks?

    #2 Why was the mandatory 10minute delay time for calling in lost contact IGNORED and it took 45 minutes to call in loss of contact?

    #3 Why on that specific morning at that specific time was NO ONE important in those buildings?

    #4 How did the cabbies know something was up?

    #5 The timing for the insurance and its terrorist clauses is interesting. Explain that (in context with everything else)

    #6 The timing of the stock sales and its accuracy again in context with everything else.

    #7 Why was ALL non public footage (gas stations hotel surveillance etc.. etc..) TAKEN and never released to the public.

    ———–

    #6 and #7 would not warrant attention by themselves but combine them with everything else and things get very very interesting.

    ONE extreme issue I do have curiosity over was building 7. what took it down? no plane hit it. No serious debris or fire hit it. yet IT ALSO collapsed in the same was as the other 2 did. The 9/11 commission all but IGNORED building 7 as well.

    I won’t jump to “oh my god they did it” assumptions just yet but combined with the other questions IT IS interesting.

  • http://profiles.google.com/nsf3msu J Dickinson

    The White House couldn’t cover up a blow job in the Oval Office. Game over morons.

  • http://www.facebook.com/paul.lopiccolo Paul LoPiccolo

    My one comment is to #6.
    Mayor of New York stated on National News that they were going to pull Tower 7, and they they did. I saw this on the news. He said it then it happened in a very short time period. He then recanted on his words later. Pull is a word used in demolitions. So I believe that yes tower 7 was brought down by people on site. Funny how fast they had it wired.
    Also the 9-11 comission report is fairly inaccurate and missing much detail.

  • http://trifco.tonidoid.com/app/openid V

    1. Fals flag attack just google it.. it’s easier than you think..
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd6zKqGcaOM
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3319663041501647311#

    2. He saw, she saw.. I would love to see all tapes from all security cameras that recorded what happened. So far we have 5 frames of blur.

    3. WTC was hit by planes. Pentagon did not.

    4. Maybe he lied for a reason for his family/business friend GWB? http://www.saintpetersburgtimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml

    5. Yes the people involved in the act are the best to investigate them selfs. LOL

    6. Could it be that someone was there before 9/11 (Gasp!)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4aHtWfeBI4

    7. Cannon Fodder?

    8. Why would they need to do that for? There is NO consequences for them personally whatsoever for their false claims anyway.

    9. How about makin some serious money?
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6239734.stm
    http://lookfromabove.com/uncategorized/how-invasion-of-afghanistan-worked-for-opium-production

    10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI

    Dear John.. when you get older I hope your view of how the world works will be much more clear.

  • http://www.facebook.com/designedsilence Brian Brooks

    Wow this even worth responding to. Fuck this fat virgin sasuage finger having idiot.

  • http://www.facebook.com/designedsilence Brian Brooks

    Wow this even worth responding to. Fuck this fat virgin sasuage finger having idiot.

  • http://www.facebook.com/designedsilence Brian Brooks

    Wow this even worth responding to. Fuck this fat virgin sasuage finger having idiot.

  • http://profiles.google.com/emmer331 mike buynak

    How does anyone know that eye witness is telling any truth what so ever? Does he have pictures, videos? Also, How is it that the WTC buildings are the first two in History to be taken down by airplanes, needless to say these planes hit way up near the top!
    There is some fishy shit about 9/11.
    Vote for Julian Assange!

  • http://profiles.google.com/ameergittens Ameer Gittens

    This guy is so blind there’s no point in shooting down his arguments…but I will anyway:

    1. Compartmentalization. See: “Norman Mineta”

    2. Testimony is “evidence” not “proof”. Other people saw different things. There are problems with the impact videos and collapse videos show squibs.

    3. What if some of these people weren’t ever even real? Ever heard of the “witness protection program”? They had 10 years to plan this and $2.3 trillion to spend…this was the easy part. People are easily disposed of. Documentation is easily faked.

    4. Bin Laden is a long-time Bush family friend and a CIA agent. Claims that he said anything at all are totally meaningless.

    5. You are unbelievably naive. How difficult would it be for political pressure to be applied, ala Wikileaks? Did you see how quickly the gov’t was able to get Mastercard, Paypal and even the Swiss banks and authorities to turn on Assange? How long have *all* the government agencies been lying about the Kennedy assassination?

    6. Drawing on the experience of the Empire State Building, The WTC was specifically designed to withstand impacts from jet airplanes…which they clearly did for at least an hour when the buildings gave way to “heat”. In an hour.

    7. Google “$2.3 trillion”. That should answer this question adequately. The people killed in the mostly-empty, recently-reinforced section of the Pentagon were clearly sacrificed.

    8. There was no need to fake WMDs and you can use what they did *not* do as evidence of anything. Why didn’t they fake capture Bin Laden? Why haven’t they *actually* caught him? Don’t do this again, you’re really bad at this.

    9. Heroin. The Taliban had burned the poppy fields that supply 95% of the world’s heroin. Heroin is needed to prop up the US economy now that we don’t manufacture any marketable goods.

    10. Any government official who responds to questions (or accusations) about government complicity in 9/11 with “that’s offensive” is in on it. Yes, Obama is in on it–albeit after the fact. Every president will hold the line on the actions of all prior presidents. That’s the way it’s always been.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ameergittens Ameer Gittens

    This guy is so blind there’s no point in shooting down his arguments…but I will anyway:

    1. Compartmentalization. See: “Norman Mineta”

    2. Testimony is “evidence” not “proof”. Other people saw different things. There are problems with the impact videos and collapse videos show squibs.

    3. What if some of these people weren’t ever even real? Ever heard of the “witness protection program”? They had 10 years to plan this and $2.3 trillion to spend…this was the easy part. People are easily disposed of. Documentation is easily faked.

    4. Bin Laden is a long-time Bush family friend and a CIA agent. Claims that he said anything at all are totally meaningless.

    5. You are unbelievably naive. How difficult would it be for political pressure to be applied, ala Wikileaks? Did you see how quickly the gov’t was able to get Mastercard, Paypal and even the Swiss banks and authorities to turn on Assange? How long have *all* the government agencies been lying about the Kennedy assassination?

    6. Drawing on the experience of the Empire State Building, The WTC was specifically designed to withstand impacts from jet airplanes…which they clearly did for at least an hour when the buildings gave way to “heat”. In an hour.

    7. Google “$2.3 trillion”. That should answer this question adequately. The people killed in the mostly-empty, recently-reinforced section of the Pentagon were clearly sacrificed.

    8. There was no need to fake WMDs and you can use what they did *not* do as evidence of anything. Why didn’t they fake capture Bin Laden? Why haven’t they *actually* caught him? Don’t do this again, you’re really bad at this.

    9. Heroin. The Taliban had burned the poppy fields that supply 95% of the world’s heroin. Heroin is needed to prop up the US economy now that we don’t manufacture any marketable goods.

    10. Any government official who responds to questions (or accusations) about government complicity in 9/11 with “that’s offensive” is in on it. Yes, Obama is in on it–albeit after the fact. Every president will hold the line on the actions of all prior presidents. That’s the way it’s always been.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trace-Lewis/502435081 Trace Lewis

    Bin Laden was a CIA tactician. The official story just doesn’t add up, we saw planes hit the towers over and over for days on end, but the film of whatever hit the pentagon (which i might add is the MOST filmed building in the world) is what, like four blurry frames? The MSM is controlled by central banks, think about it man. you just sound ignorant here..”ther are none more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trace-Lewis/502435081 Trace Lewis

    Bin Laden was a CIA tactician. The official story just doesn’t add up, we saw planes hit the towers over and over for days on end, but the film of whatever hit the pentagon (which i might add is the MOST filmed building in the world) is what, like four blurry frames? The MSM is controlled by central banks, think about it man. you just sound ignorant here..”ther are none more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trace-Lewis/502435081 Trace Lewis

    Bin Laden was a CIA tactician. The official story just doesn’t add up, we saw planes hit the towers over and over for days on end, but the film of whatever hit the pentagon (which i might add is the MOST filmed building in the world) is what, like four blurry frames? The MSM is controlled by central banks, think about it man. you just sound ignorant here..”ther are none more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trace-Lewis/502435081 Trace Lewis

    Bin Laden was a CIA tactician. The official story just doesn’t add up, we saw planes hit the towers over and over for days on end, but the film of whatever hit the pentagon (which i might add is the MOST filmed building in the world) is what, like four blurry frames? The MSM is controlled by central banks, think about it man. you just sound ignorant here..”ther are none more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7IICAXHWGQDVTZ6IPF7EV7HENY Rod Plumber

    You “truthers” are all F’ing nuts. Get a life!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trace-Lewis/502435081 Trace Lewis

      pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, eh?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trace-Lewis/502435081 Trace Lewis

      pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, eh?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7IICAXHWGQDVTZ6IPF7EV7HENY Rod Plumber

    You “truthers” are all F’ing nuts. Get a life!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7IICAXHWGQDVTZ6IPF7EV7HENY Rod Plumber

    You “truthers” are all F’ing nuts. Get a life!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7IICAXHWGQDVTZ6IPF7EV7HENY Rod Plumber

    You “truthers” are all F’ing nuts. Get a life!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7IICAXHWGQDVTZ6IPF7EV7HENY Rod Plumber

    You “truthers” are all F’ing nuts. Get a life!

  • Pingback: 10 Questions for 9/11 Truthers | Right Wing News | NotSoCrazyNews BETA

  • http://profiles.google.com/ameergittens Ameer Gittens

    Well, @Hologram5, it looks like you’ve got more homework to do. If the official story doesn’t do it for you where is the explanation for why they told it…and keep standing by it?

    The only way to make sense of *everything* that we’ve seen and heard in relation to 9/11 since the day it happened is to put the US gov’t (or elements therein) squarely at the center. Everything else will fall into place…if you can stomach it.

  • Anonymous

    No one claims to “know” what really happened. The only thing we can all agree on is that the Bush Administration clearly lied, obstructed any real investigation, and put out a narrative and timeline that are ludicrous. This particular article is simply pathetic, a tired old rehash stating that anyone who doesn’t believe the Bush version is crazy. Yawn.

  • Anonymous

    No one claims to “know” what really happened. The only thing we can all agree on is that the Bush Administration clearly lied, obstructed any real investigation, and put out a narrative and timeline that are ludicrous. This particular article is simply pathetic, a tired old rehash stating that anyone who doesn’t believe the Bush version is crazy. Yawn.

  • Anonymous

    No one claims to “know” what really happened. The only thing we can all agree on is that the Bush Administration clearly lied, obstructed any real investigation, and put out a narrative and timeline that are ludicrous. This particular article is simply pathetic, a tired old rehash stating that anyone who doesn’t believe the Bush version is crazy. Yawn.

  • Anonymous

    No one claims to “know” what really happened. The only thing we can all agree on is that the Bush Administration clearly lied, obstructed any real investigation, and put out a narrative and timeline that are ludicrous. This particular article is simply pathetic, a tired old rehash stating that anyone who doesn’t believe the Bush version is crazy. Yawn.

  • Anonymous

    rationaldude continued
    6. Again, it’s funny how people think they understand how a black op would be conducted. Unless you are a deep cover agent neither you nor I has any idea. Although it is documented that there was many evacuations as well as building maintenance going on the months prior. This was never investigated by any commission. Why?
    7. Another asinine statement. Pure speculation on your part. In a covert operation like this no one on the outside could possibly know who knew or didn’t know it was going on. If you want to take that route remember the plane maneuvered to hit the part of the pentagon that was under renovation.
    8. Who is saying that? Not me. I’m saying there were people inside our government, military, secret agencies that knew and helped this happen. I won’t speculate whether Bush knew or not.
    9. At this point I realize you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about and I’m sorry I even responded and wasted my time. More speculation and it’s just silly at this point. That is a question for the CIA to answer not you. But if you want to speculate well then I will too. War no matter where brings money to the military industrial complex. Have you forgotten about all of the no-bid contracts and the billions of dollars in handouts still unaccounted for?
    10. Again, I’m not saying Bush had a clue what was going on. I’m saying at the least there were persons inside our government, whether military, political, or cia/fbi agents that helped this happen.

  • Anonymous

    My head is going to explode… I just cannot believe all these commenters that believe- whole-heartedly- that this whole thing is one giant cover-up.

    In some regards these people are even crazier than the Birthers. The Birthers believe that one single incident is being covered up. The Truthers believe that every aspect of the government is helping to perpetuate a cover-up of the worst crime against the US since Pearl Harbor.

    If a government cover-up requires acompetent government then obviously there could be no cover-up because we have anything but a competent government.

  • Anonymous

    My head is going to explode… I just cannot believe all these commenters that believe- whole-heartedly- that this whole thing is one giant cover-up.

    In some regards these people are even crazier than the Birthers. The Birthers believe that one single incident is being covered up. The Truthers believe that every aspect of the government is helping to perpetuate a cover-up of the worst crime against the US since Pearl Harbor.

    If a government cover-up requires acompetent government then obviously there could be no cover-up because we have anything but a competent government.

  • Anonymous

    My head is going to explode… I just cannot believe all these commenters that believe- whole-heartedly- that this whole thing is one giant cover-up.

    In some regards these people are even crazier than the Birthers. The Birthers believe that one single incident is being covered up. The Truthers believe that every aspect of the government is helping to perpetuate a cover-up of the worst crime against the US since Pearl Harbor.

    If a government cover-up requires acompetent government then obviously there could be no cover-up because we have anything but a competent government.

  • Anonymous

    My head is going to explode… I just cannot believe all these commenters that believe- whole-heartedly- that this whole thing is one giant cover-up.

    In some regards these people are even crazier than the Birthers. The Birthers believe that one single incident is being covered up. The Truthers believe that every aspect of the government is helping to perpetuate a cover-up of the worst crime against the US since Pearl Harbor.

    If a government cover-up requires acompetent government then obviously there could be no cover-up because we have anything but a competent government.

  • Anonymous

    OK, let’s say it was a missile that hit the Pentagon….the Pentagon is supposedly the center of the “military industrial complex.” Why would the military industrial complex attack itself?

    I’ve heard people say everything from the planes shooting out missiles, to the idea that the planes were actually holograms and the bombs were in the building.

    What about Barbara Olsen? She was a correspondent for CNN and died in the plane that hit the Pentagon. Is she secretly alive in an underground bunker somewhere?

    This is nothing more than a bunch of silliness.

  • Anonymous

    OK, let’s say it was a missile that hit the Pentagon….the Pentagon is supposedly the center of the “military industrial complex.” Why would the military industrial complex attack itself?

    I’ve heard people say everything from the planes shooting out missiles, to the idea that the planes were actually holograms and the bombs were in the building.

    What about Barbara Olsen? She was a correspondent for CNN and died in the plane that hit the Pentagon. Is she secretly alive in an underground bunker somewhere?

    This is nothing more than a bunch of silliness.

  • Anonymous

    OK, let’s say it was a missile that hit the Pentagon….the Pentagon is supposedly the center of the “military industrial complex.” Why would the military industrial complex attack itself?

    I’ve heard people say everything from the planes shooting out missiles, to the idea that the planes were actually holograms and the bombs were in the building.

    What about Barbara Olsen? She was a correspondent for CNN and died in the plane that hit the Pentagon. Is she secretly alive in an underground bunker somewhere?

    This is nothing more than a bunch of silliness.

  • Anonymous

    OK, let’s say it was a missile that hit the Pentagon….the Pentagon is supposedly the center of the “military industrial complex.” Why would the military industrial complex attack itself?

    I’ve heard people say everything from the planes shooting out missiles, to the idea that the planes were actually holograms and the bombs were in the building.

    What about Barbara Olsen? She was a correspondent for CNN and died in the plane that hit the Pentagon. Is she secretly alive in an underground bunker somewhere?

    This is nothing more than a bunch of silliness.

  • Anonymous

    OK, let’s say it was a missile that hit the Pentagon….the Pentagon is supposedly the center of the “military industrial complex.” Why would the military industrial complex attack itself?

    I’ve heard people say everything from the planes shooting out missiles, to the idea that the planes were actually holograms and the bombs were in the building.

    What about Barbara Olsen? She was a correspondent for CNN and died in the plane that hit the Pentagon. Is she secretly alive in an underground bunker somewhere?

    This is nothing more than a bunch of silliness.

  • Anonymous

    OK, let’s say it was a missile that hit the Pentagon….the Pentagon is supposedly the center of the “military industrial complex.” Why would the military industrial complex attack itself?

    I’ve heard people say everything from the planes shooting out missiles, to the idea that the planes were actually holograms and the bombs were in the building.

    What about Barbara Olsen? She was a correspondent for CNN and died in the plane that hit the Pentagon. Is she secretly alive in an underground bunker somewhere?

    This is nothing more than a bunch of silliness.

  • Anonymous

    OK, let’s say it was a missile that hit the Pentagon….the Pentagon is supposedly the center of the “military industrial complex.” Why would the military industrial complex attack itself?

    I’ve heard people say everything from the planes shooting out missiles, to the idea that the planes were actually holograms and the bombs were in the building.

    What about Barbara Olsen? She was a correspondent for CNN and died in the plane that hit the Pentagon. Is she secretly alive in an underground bunker somewhere?

    This is nothing more than a bunch of silliness.

  • Anonymous

    OK, let’s say it was a missile that hit the Pentagon….the Pentagon is supposedly the center of the “military industrial complex.” Why would the military industrial complex attack itself?

    I’ve heard people say everything from the planes shooting out missiles, to the idea that the planes were actually holograms and the bombs were in the building.

    What about Barbara Olsen? She was a correspondent for CNN and died in the plane that hit the Pentagon. Is she secretly alive in an underground bunker somewhere?

    This is nothing more than a bunch of silliness.

  • http://twitter.com/skitt123 skitt123

    1.) Those numbers are grossly overestimated. In truth, assuming this was done in the higher eschelons of the government, then one can’t help but assume that they have highly skilled and highly secretive people on the payroll who would sell out their own mother for an overall piece of the pie. You are assuming that the government went and hired “regular” people with consciences. That is a very naive way of thinking when it comes to the power behind the United States Government.

    2.) If the government was truly behind it, and they wanted to blame it on terrorists in planes, and they knew they wanted to hit the Pentagon with precision, then they knew they had to use a missile. And if it was a missile, and I’m not saying it was… then it was most likely made to look like a plane. Don’t tell me it can’t be done.

    3.) They were murdered. Collateral damage. You people need to start thinking like machines and stop toying around with the naive belief that a powerful government (including our own) won’t resort to murdering a few hundred people in order to further their agenda.

    4.) Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA. I’m sure they paid him a lot of money to take the blame. Funny how the world’s greatest army haven’t been able to find him in almost ten years, don’t you think?

    5.) Let me ask you this… Imagine you looked at the evidence and you were sure that the government was behind the atacks. And let’s say that on your way home after work you stopped in to Starbucks for some coffee and someone slipped a note in your pocket that gave the names of your entire family, their schedules, etc. with a note that said to keep quiet. Would you still come forward? I’m not saying it happens this way, or that it even happened at all… but IF they were responsible for the attacks, I think they’d have probably figured out how to get around these little problems.

    6.) It’s a magician’s trick. It’s called misdirection. The government knew the buildings had to come down and they weren’t convinced that the planes alone would do the job. It is widely known that two weeks prior to 9/11, security at the Twin Towers in NYC was lightened in the days just before the 9/11 attacks. What makes the particular removal of bomb-sniffing dogs so important are statements from firemen that they heard bombs going off in the Towers on 9/11, as they were carrying out their rescue operation. Naturally, if people were planting bombs in the Towers, they would not have wanted those charges to be discovered by trained dogs prior to 9/11. This matter of the dogs and the statements of firemen about bombs were completely ignored by the 9/11 commission.

    7.) You are assuming that Rumsfeld was involved. Ever heard of plausible deniability?

    8.) They didn’t have to. Their whole plan was to just get there. Once there, it didn’t matter anymore.

    9.) Cuba? Are you serious? And risk a war with the Russians? What good would that do? Afghanistan has little resources… but what it has a lot of is funny looking people with beards and towels on their heads. The war is just a coverup to perpetuate the lie.

    10.) Why would they know about it? You think just because you’re president, the conspiritors will come to you and tell you what they did? That’s probably the stupidest question out of all of them.

  • http://twitter.com/skitt123 skitt123

    1.) Those numbers are grossly overestimated. In truth, assuming this was done in the higher eschelons of the government, then one can’t help but assume that they have highly skilled and highly secretive people on the payroll who would sell out their own mother for an overall piece of the pie. You are assuming that the government went and hired “regular” people with consciences. That is a very naive way of thinking when it comes to the power behind the United States Government.

    2.) If the government was truly behind it, and they wanted to blame it on terrorists in planes, and they knew they wanted to hit the Pentagon with precision, then they knew they had to use a missile. And if it was a missile, and I’m not saying it was… then it was most likely made to look like a plane. Don’t tell me it can’t be done.

    3.) They were murdered. Collateral damage. You people need to start thinking like machines and stop toying around with the naive belief that a powerful government (including our own) won’t resort to murdering a few hundred people in order to further their agenda.

    4.) Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA. I’m sure they paid him a lot of money to take the blame. Funny how the world’s greatest army haven’t been able to find him in almost ten years, don’t you think?

    5.) Let me ask you this… Imagine you looked at the evidence and you were sure that the government was behind the atacks. And let’s say that on your way home after work you stopped in to Starbucks for some coffee and someone slipped a note in your pocket that gave the names of your entire family, their schedules, etc. with a note that said to keep quiet. Would you still come forward? I’m not saying it happens this way, or that it even happened at all… but IF they were responsible for the attacks, I think they’d have probably figured out how to get around these little problems.

    6.) It’s a magician’s trick. It’s called misdirection. The government knew the buildings had to come down and they weren’t convinced that the planes alone would do the job. It is widely known that two weeks prior to 9/11, security at the Twin Towers in NYC was lightened in the days just before the 9/11 attacks. What makes the particular removal of bomb-sniffing dogs so important are statements from firemen that they heard bombs going off in the Towers on 9/11, as they were carrying out their rescue operation. Naturally, if people were planting bombs in the Towers, they would not have wanted those charges to be discovered by trained dogs prior to 9/11. This matter of the dogs and the statements of firemen about bombs were completely ignored by the 9/11 commission.

    7.) You are assuming that Rumsfeld was involved. Ever heard of plausible deniability?

    8.) They didn’t have to. Their whole plan was to just get there. Once there, it didn’t matter anymore.

    9.) Cuba? Are you serious? And risk a war with the Russians? What good would that do? Afghanistan has little resources… but what it has a lot of is funny looking people with beards and towels on their heads. The war is just a coverup to perpetuate the lie.

    10.) Why would they know about it? You think just because you’re president, the conspiritors will come to you and tell you what they did? That’s probably the stupidest question out of all of them.

  • http://twitter.com/skitt123 skitt123

    1.) Those numbers are grossly overestimated. In truth, assuming this was done in the higher eschelons of the government, then one can’t help but assume that they have highly skilled and highly secretive people on the payroll who would sell out their own mother for an overall piece of the pie. You are assuming that the government went and hired “regular” people with consciences. That is a very naive way of thinking when it comes to the power behind the United States Government.

    2.) If the government was truly behind it, and they wanted to blame it on terrorists in planes, and they knew they wanted to hit the Pentagon with precision, then they knew they had to use a missile. And if it was a missile, and I’m not saying it was… then it was most likely made to look like a plane. Don’t tell me it can’t be done.

    3.) They were murdered. Collateral damage. You people need to start thinking like machines and stop toying around with the naive belief that a powerful government (including our own) won’t resort to murdering a few hundred people in order to further their agenda.

    4.) Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA. I’m sure they paid him a lot of money to take the blame. Funny how the world’s greatest army haven’t been able to find him in almost ten years, don’t you think?

    5.) Let me ask you this… Imagine you looked at the evidence and you were sure that the government was behind the atacks. And let’s say that on your way home after work you stopped in to Starbucks for some coffee and someone slipped a note in your pocket that gave the names of your entire family, their schedules, etc. with a note that said to keep quiet. Would you still come forward? I’m not saying it happens this way, or that it even happened at all… but IF they were responsible for the attacks, I think they’d have probably figured out how to get around these little problems.

    6.) It’s a magician’s trick. It’s called misdirection. The government knew the buildings had to come down and they weren’t convinced that the planes alone would do the job. It is widely known that two weeks prior to 9/11, security at the Twin Towers in NYC was lightened in the days just before the 9/11 attacks. What makes the particular removal of bomb-sniffing dogs so important are statements from firemen that they heard bombs going off in the Towers on 9/11, as they were carrying out their rescue operation. Naturally, if people were planting bombs in the Towers, they would not have wanted those charges to be discovered by trained dogs prior to 9/11. This matter of the dogs and the statements of firemen about bombs were completely ignored by the 9/11 commission.

    7.) You are assuming that Rumsfeld was involved. Ever heard of plausible deniability?

    8.) They didn’t have to. Their whole plan was to just get there. Once there, it didn’t matter anymore.

    9.) Cuba? Are you serious? And risk a war with the Russians? What good would that do? Afghanistan has little resources… but what it has a lot of is funny looking people with beards and towels on their heads. The war is just a coverup to perpetuate the lie.

    10.) Why would they know about it? You think just because you’re president, the conspiritors will come to you and tell you what they did? That’s probably the stupidest question out of all of them.

  • http://twitter.com/skitt123 skitt123

    1.) Those numbers are grossly overestimated. In truth, assuming this was done in the higher eschelons of the government, then one can’t help but assume that they have highly skilled and highly secretive people on the payroll who would sell out their own mother for an overall piece of the pie. You are assuming that the government went and hired “regular” people with consciences. That is a very naive way of thinking when it comes to the power behind the United States Government.

    2.) If the government was truly behind it, and they wanted to blame it on terrorists in planes, and they knew they wanted to hit the Pentagon with precision, then they knew they had to use a missile. And if it was a missile, and I’m not saying it was… then it was most likely made to look like a plane. Don’t tell me it can’t be done.

    3.) They were murdered. Collateral damage. You people need to start thinking like machines and stop toying around with the naive belief that a powerful government (including our own) won’t resort to murdering a few hundred people in order to further their agenda.

    4.) Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA. I’m sure they paid him a lot of money to take the blame. Funny how the world’s greatest army haven’t been able to find him in almost ten years, don’t you think?

    5.) Let me ask you this… Imagine you looked at the evidence and you were sure that the government was behind the atacks. And let’s say that on your way home after work you stopped in to Starbucks for some coffee and someone slipped a note in your pocket that gave the names of your entire family, their schedules, etc. with a note that said to keep quiet. Would you still come forward? I’m not saying it happens this way, or that it even happened at all… but IF they were responsible for the attacks, I think they’d have probably figured out how to get around these little problems.

    6.) It’s a magician’s trick. It’s called misdirection. The government knew the buildings had to come down and they weren’t convinced that the planes alone would do the job. It is widely known that two weeks prior to 9/11, security at the Twin Towers in NYC was lightened in the days just before the 9/11 attacks. What makes the particular removal of bomb-sniffing dogs so important are statements from firemen that they heard bombs going off in the Towers on 9/11, as they were carrying out their rescue operation. Naturally, if people were planting bombs in the Towers, they would not have wanted those charges to be discovered by trained dogs prior to 9/11. This matter of the dogs and the statements of firemen about bombs were completely ignored by the 9/11 commission.

    7.) You are assuming that Rumsfeld was involved. Ever heard of plausible deniability?

    8.) They didn’t have to. Their whole plan was to just get there. Once there, it didn’t matter anymore.

    9.) Cuba? Are you serious? And risk a war with the Russians? What good would that do? Afghanistan has little resources… but what it has a lot of is funny looking people with beards and towels on their heads. The war is just a coverup to perpetuate the lie.

    10.) Why would they know about it? You think just because you’re president, the conspiritors will come to you and tell you what they did? That’s probably the stupidest question out of all of them.

  • http://twitter.com/skitt123 skitt123

    1.) Those numbers are grossly overestimated. In truth, assuming this was done in the higher eschelons of the government, then one can’t help but assume that they have highly skilled and highly secretive people on the payroll who would sell out their own mother for an overall piece of the pie. You are assuming that the government went and hired “regular” people with consciences. That is a very naive way of thinking when it comes to the power behind the United States Government.

    2.) If the government was truly behind it, and they wanted to blame it on terrorists in planes, and they knew they wanted to hit the Pentagon with precision, then they knew they had to use a missile. And if it was a missile, and I’m not saying it was… then it was most likely made to look like a plane. Don’t tell me it can’t be done.

    3.) They were murdered. Collateral damage. You people need to start thinking like machines and stop toying around with the naive belief that a powerful government (including our own) won’t resort to murdering a few hundred people in order to further their agenda.

    4.) Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA. I’m sure they paid him a lot of money to take the blame. Funny how the world’s greatest army haven’t been able to find him in almost ten years, don’t you think?

    5.) Let me ask you this… Imagine you looked at the evidence and you were sure that the government was behind the atacks. And let’s say that on your way home after work you stopped in to Starbucks for some coffee and someone slipped a note in your pocket that gave the names of your entire family, their schedules, etc. with a note that said to keep quiet. Would you still come forward? I’m not saying it happens this way, or that it even happened at all… but IF they were responsible for the attacks, I think they’d have probably figured out how to get around these little problems.

    6.) It’s a magician’s trick. It’s called misdirection. The government knew the buildings had to come down and they weren’t convinced that the planes alone would do the job. It is widely known that two weeks prior to 9/11, security at the Twin Towers in NYC was lightened in the days just before the 9/11 attacks. What makes the particular removal of bomb-sniffing dogs so important are statements from firemen that they heard bombs going off in the Towers on 9/11, as they were carrying out their rescue operation. Naturally, if people were planting bombs in the Towers, they would not have wanted those charges to be discovered by trained dogs prior to 9/11. This matter of the dogs and the statements of firemen about bombs were completely ignored by the 9/11 commission.

    7.) You are assuming that Rumsfeld was involved. Ever heard of plausible deniability?

    8.) They didn’t have to. Their whole plan was to just get there. Once there, it didn’t matter anymore.

    9.) Cuba? Are you serious? And risk a war with the Russians? What good would that do? Afghanistan has little resources… but what it has a lot of is funny looking people with beards and towels on their heads. The war is just a coverup to perpetuate the lie.

    10.) Why would they know about it? You think just because you’re president, the conspiritors will come to you and tell you what they did? That’s probably the stupidest question out of all of them.

  • http://twitter.com/skitt123 skitt123

    1.) Those numbers are grossly overestimated. In truth, assuming this was done in the higher eschelons of the government, then one can’t help but assume that they have highly skilled and highly secretive people on the payroll who would sell out their own mother for an overall piece of the pie. You are assuming that the government went and hired “regular” people with consciences. That is a very naive way of thinking when it comes to the power behind the United States Government.

    2.) If the government was truly behind it, and they wanted to blame it on terrorists in planes, and they knew they wanted to hit the Pentagon with precision, then they knew they had to use a missile. And if it was a missile, and I’m not saying it was… then it was most likely made to look like a plane. Don’t tell me it can’t be done.

    3.) They were murdered. Collateral damage. You people need to start thinking like machines and stop toying around with the naive belief that a powerful government (including our own) won’t resort to murdering a few hundred people in order to further their agenda.

    4.) Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA. I’m sure they paid him a lot of money to take the blame. Funny how the world’s greatest army haven’t been able to find him in almost ten years, don’t you think?

    5.) Let me ask you this… Imagine you looked at the evidence and you were sure that the government was behind the atacks. And let’s say that on your way home after work you stopped in to Starbucks for some coffee and someone slipped a note in your pocket that gave the names of your entire family, their schedules, etc. with a note that said to keep quiet. Would you still come forward? I’m not saying it happens this way, or that it even happened at all… but IF they were responsible for the attacks, I think they’d have probably figured out how to get around these little problems.

    6.) It’s a magician’s trick. It’s called misdirection. The government knew the buildings had to come down and they weren’t convinced that the planes alone would do the job. It is widely known that two weeks prior to 9/11, security at the Twin Towers in NYC was lightened in the days just before the 9/11 attacks. What makes the particular removal of bomb-sniffing dogs so important are statements from firemen that they heard bombs going off in the Towers on 9/11, as they were carrying out their rescue operation. Naturally, if people were planting bombs in the Towers, they would not have wanted those charges to be discovered by trained dogs prior to 9/11. This matter of the dogs and the statements of firemen about bombs were completely ignored by the 9/11 commission.

    7.) You are assuming that Rumsfeld was involved. Ever heard of plausible deniability?

    8.) They didn’t have to. Their whole plan was to just get there. Once there, it didn’t matter anymore.

    9.) Cuba? Are you serious? And risk a war with the Russians? What good would that do? Afghanistan has little resources… but what it has a lot of is funny looking people with beards and towels on their heads. The war is just a coverup to perpetuate the lie.

    10.) Why would they know about it? You think just because you’re president, the conspiritors will come to you and tell you what they did? That’s probably the stupidest question out of all of them.

  • http://twitter.com/skitt123 skitt123

    1.) Those numbers are grossly overestimated. In truth, assuming this was done in the higher eschelons of the government, then one can’t help but assume that they have highly skilled and highly secretive people on the payroll who would sell out their own mother for an overall piece of the pie. You are assuming that the government went and hired “regular” people with consciences. That is a very naive way of thinking when it comes to the power behind the United States Government.

    2.) If the government was truly behind it, and they wanted to blame it on terrorists in planes, and they knew they wanted to hit the Pentagon with precision, then they knew they had to use a missile. And if it was a missile, and I’m not saying it was… then it was most likely made to look like a plane. Don’t tell me it can’t be done.

    3.) They were murdered. Collateral damage. You people need to start thinking like machines and stop toying around with the naive belief that a powerful government (including our own) won’t resort to murdering a few hundred people in order to further their agenda.

    4.) Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA. I’m sure they paid him a lot of money to take the blame. Funny how the world’s greatest army haven’t been able to find him in almost ten years, don’t you think?

    5.) Let me ask you this… Imagine you looked at the evidence and you were sure that the government was behind the atacks. And let’s say that on your way home after work you stopped in to Starbucks for some coffee and someone slipped a note in your pocket that gave the names of your entire family, their schedules, etc. with a note that said to keep quiet. Would you still come forward? I’m not saying it happens this way, or that it even happened at all… but IF they were responsible for the attacks, I think they’d have probably figured out how to get around these little problems.

    6.) It’s a magician’s trick. It’s called misdirection. The government knew the buildings had to come down and they weren’t convinced that the planes alone would do the job. It is widely known that two weeks prior to 9/11, security at the Twin Towers in NYC was lightened in the days just before the 9/11 attacks. What makes the particular removal of bomb-sniffing dogs so important are statements from firemen that they heard bombs going off in the Towers on 9/11, as they were carrying out their rescue operation. Naturally, if people were planting bombs in the Towers, they would not have wanted those charges to be discovered by trained dogs prior to 9/11. This matter of the dogs and the statements of firemen about bombs were completely ignored by the 9/11 commission.

    7.) You are assuming that Rumsfeld was involved. Ever heard of plausible deniability?

    8.) They didn’t have to. Their whole plan was to just get there. Once there, it didn’t matter anymore.

    9.) Cuba? Are you serious? And risk a war with the Russians? What good would that do? Afghanistan has little resources… but what it has a lot of is funny looking people with beards and towels on their heads. The war is just a coverup to perpetuate the lie.

    10.) Why would they know about it? You think just because you’re president, the conspiritors will come to you and tell you what they did? That’s probably the stupidest question out of all of them.

  • http://twitter.com/skitt123 skitt123

    1.) Those numbers are grossly overestimated. In truth, assuming this was done in the higher eschelons of the government, then one can’t help but assume that they have highly skilled and highly secretive people on the payroll who would sell out their own mother for an overall piece of the pie. You are assuming that the government went and hired “regular” people with consciences. That is a very naive way of thinking when it comes to the power behind the United States Government.

    2.) If the government was truly behind it, and they wanted to blame it on terrorists in planes, and they knew they wanted to hit the Pentagon with precision, then they knew they had to use a missile. And if it was a missile, and I’m not saying it was… then it was most likely made to look like a plane. Don’t tell me it can’t be done.

    3.) They were murdered. Collateral damage. You people need to start thinking like machines and stop toying around with the naive belief that a powerful government (including our own) won’t resort to murdering a few hundred people in order to further their agenda.

    4.) Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA. I’m sure they paid him a lot of money to take the blame. Funny how the world’s greatest army haven’t been able to find him in almost ten years, don’t you think?

    5.) Let me ask you this… Imagine you looked at the evidence and you were sure that the government was behind the atacks. And let’s say that on your way home after work you stopped in to Starbucks for some coffee and someone slipped a note in your pocket that gave the names of your entire family, their schedules, etc. with a note that said to keep quiet. Would you still come forward? I’m not saying it happens this way, or that it even happened at all… but IF they were responsible for the attacks, I think they’d have probably figured out how to get around these little problems.

    6.) It’s a magician’s trick. It’s called misdirection. The government knew the buildings had to come down and they weren’t convinced that the planes alone would do the job. It is widely known that two weeks prior to 9/11, security at the Twin Towers in NYC was lightened in the days just before the 9/11 attacks. What makes the particular removal of bomb-sniffing dogs so important are statements from firemen that they heard bombs going off in the Towers on 9/11, as they were carrying out their rescue operation. Naturally, if people were planting bombs in the Towers, they would not have wanted those charges to be discovered by trained dogs prior to 9/11. This matter of the dogs and the statements of firemen about bombs were completely ignored by the 9/11 commission.

    7.) You are assuming that Rumsfeld was involved. Ever heard of plausible deniability?

    8.) They didn’t have to. Their whole plan was to just get there. Once there, it didn’t matter anymore.

    9.) Cuba? Are you serious? And risk a war with the Russians? What good would that do? Afghanistan has little resources… but what it has a lot of is funny looking people with beards and towels on their heads. The war is just a coverup to perpetuate the lie.

    10.) Why would they know about it? You think just because you’re president, the conspiritors will come to you and tell you what they did? That’s probably the stupidest question out of all of them.

  • http://twitter.com/skitt123 skitt123

    1.) Those numbers are grossly overestimated. In truth, assuming this was done in the higher eschelons of the government, then one can’t help but assume that they have highly skilled and highly secretive people on the payroll who would sell out their own mother for an overall piece of the pie. You are assuming that the government went and hired “regular” people with consciences. That is a very naive way of thinking when it comes to the power behind the United States Government.

    2.) If the government was truly behind it, and they wanted to blame it on terrorists in planes, and they knew they wanted to hit the Pentagon with precision, then they knew they had to use a missile. And if it was a missile, and I’m not saying it was… then it was most likely made to look like a plane. Don’t tell me it can’t be done.

    3.) They were murdered. Collateral damage. You people need to start thinking like machines and stop toying around with the naive belief that a powerful government (including our own) won’t resort to murdering a few hundred people in order to further their agenda.

    4.) Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA. I’m sure they paid him a lot of money to take the blame. Funny how the world’s greatest army haven’t been able to find him in almost ten years, don’t you think?

    5.) Let me ask you this… Imagine you looked at the evidence and you were sure that the government was behind the atacks. And let’s say that on your way home after work you stopped in to Starbucks for some coffee and someone slipped a note in your pocket that gave the names of your entire family, their schedules, etc. with a note that said to keep quiet. Would you still come forward? I’m not saying it happens this way, or that it even happened at all… but IF they were responsible for the attacks, I think they’d have probably figured out how to get around these little problems.

    6.) It’s a magician’s trick. It’s called misdirection. The government knew the buildings had to come down and they weren’t convinced that the planes alone would do the job. It is widely known that two weeks prior to 9/11, security at the Twin Towers in NYC was lightened in the days just before the 9/11 attacks. What makes the particular removal of bomb-sniffing dogs so important are statements from firemen that they heard bombs going off in the Towers on 9/11, as they were carrying out their rescue operation. Naturally, if people were planting bombs in the Towers, they would not have wanted those charges to be discovered by trained dogs prior to 9/11. This matter of the dogs and the statements of firemen about bombs were completely ignored by the 9/11 commission.

    7.) You are assuming that Rumsfeld was involved. Ever heard of plausible deniability?

    8.) They didn’t have to. Their whole plan was to just get there. Once there, it didn’t matter anymore.

    9.) Cuba? Are you serious? And risk a war with the Russians? What good would that do? Afghanistan has little resources… but what it has a lot of is funny looking people with beards and towels on their heads. The war is just a coverup to perpetuate the lie.

    10.) Why would they know about it? You think just because you’re president, the conspiritors will come to you and tell you what they did? That’s probably the stupidest question out of all of them.

  • http://twitter.com/skitt123 skitt123

    1.) Those numbers are grossly overestimated. In truth, assuming this was done in the higher eschelons of the government, then one can’t help but assume that they have highly skilled and highly secretive people on the payroll who would sell out their own mother for an overall piece of the pie. You are assuming that the government went and hired “regular” people with consciences. That is a very naive way of thinking when it comes to the power behind the United States Government.

    2.) If the government was truly behind it, and they wanted to blame it on terrorists in planes, and they knew they wanted to hit the Pentagon with precision, then they knew they had to use a missile. And if it was a missile, and I’m not saying it was… then it was most likely made to look like a plane. Don’t tell me it can’t be done.

    3.) They were murdered. Collateral damage. You people need to start thinking like machines and stop toying around with the naive belief that a powerful government (including our own) won’t resort to murdering a few hundred people in order to further their agenda.

    4.) Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA. I’m sure they paid him a lot of money to take the blame. Funny how the world’s greatest army haven’t been able to find him in almost ten years, don’t you think?

    5.) Let me ask you this… Imagine you looked at the evidence and you were sure that the government was behind the atacks. And let’s say that on your way home after work you stopped in to Starbucks for some coffee and someone slipped a note in your pocket that gave the names of your entire family, their schedules, etc. with a note that said to keep quiet. Would you still come forward? I’m not saying it happens this way, or that it even happened at all… but IF they were responsible for the attacks, I think they’d have probably figured out how to get around these little problems.

    6.) It’s a magician’s trick. It’s called misdirection. The government knew the buildings had to come down and they weren’t convinced that the planes alone would do the job. It is widely known that two weeks prior to 9/11, security at the Twin Towers in NYC was lightened in the days just before the 9/11 attacks. What makes the particular removal of bomb-sniffing dogs so important are statements from firemen that they heard bombs going off in the Towers on 9/11, as they were carrying out their rescue operation. Naturally, if people were planting bombs in the Towers, they would not have wanted those charges to be discovered by trained dogs prior to 9/11. This matter of the dogs and the statements of firemen about bombs were completely ignored by the 9/11 commission.

    7.) You are assuming that Rumsfeld was involved. Ever heard of plausible deniability?

    8.) They didn’t have to. Their whole plan was to just get there. Once there, it didn’t matter anymore.

    9.) Cuba? Are you serious? And risk a war with the Russians? What good would that do? Afghanistan has little resources… but what it has a lot of is funny looking people with beards and towels on their heads. The war is just a coverup to perpetuate the lie.

    10.) Why would they know about it? You think just because you’re president, the conspiritors will come to you and tell you what they did? That’s probably the stupidest question out of all of them.

  • http://twitter.com/davidbrussell David Russell

    Truthers deserve to be shot, few are as stupid as they.

  • http://twitter.com/davidbrussell David Russell

    Truthers deserve to be shot, few are as stupid as they.

  • http://twitter.com/davidbrussell David Russell

    Truthers deserve to be shot, few are as stupid as they.

  • http://profiles.google.com/pdpgti Sadath Ahmed

    The same could/should be said for birthers

  • http://profiles.google.com/pdpgti Sadath Ahmed

    The same could/should be said for birthers

  • http://www.facebook.com/MixedDrink Ryan Weatherby

    Good sir,
    Number four is an invalid point. Bin-Laden’s statement was of poor quality, and was filled with suspicious content. Bin Laden doesn’t wear a watch, it’s forbidden by his religion (he’s an extremist for god sake! No pun intended).

    Otherwise, I respect and understand the rest of your beliefs, although I far from believe them.

  • ancient9959

    John, do you really want to know the answers or are you just mad about all the conspiracy theorists talking about this stuff? John, for you to really understand what happened, I suggest you do some research on history partically about the jews and how they became to settle in the USA. Look up how the jews betrayed the German people, not once but twice.

  • http://www.livingwithanerd.com pojut

    While some of the Truther arguments are a little compelling at first glance, I think the whole Truther movement was subconsciously just a coping mechanism.

    I’m not saying there’s no truth to it, I’m just saying how quickly it appeared…yeah.

  • http://www.livingwithanerd.com pojut

    While some of the Truther arguments are a little compelling at first glance, I think the whole Truther movement was subconsciously just a coping mechanism.

    I’m not saying there’s no truth to it, I’m just saying how quickly it appeared…yeah.

  • http://www.livingwithanerd.com pojut

    While some of the Truther arguments are a little compelling at first glance, I think the whole Truther movement was subconsciously just a coping mechanism.

    I’m not saying there’s no truth to it, I’m just saying how quickly it appeared…yeah.

  • http://profiles.google.com/31under51 Nabeel Zafar

    1-duh ruthless americans are willing to sacrifice to achieve NWO
    2- lol a BBC news reporter? believe him like tonnes of ther BBC liars?
    3-not sure about the planes. it was all planned. literally, hunders of thousands of you bastard americans were involved. they all died or planes were robots.
    4-damn ure stupid. fake video.
    5-investigated by all evil companies. but when real people investigate, they are just labelled as conspiracy nuts when YOU r the people who are conspiracing, not us.
    6-dumbass, people were running for their lives. no one was looking on the walls looking for demolishing bombs. if u didnt know, people who did speak were later mysteriously murdered by u bastard americans. ure just too much into ure “my dear govt is the best and will protect me from all evils!” no! goddamit. get out of america. they will kill u.
    7.i get it. u believe in the theories but u just dont wonna do it without making ure childing american doubts clear.
    8. u made a smily face instead, dipshit.
    9. rephrase ure exploitative question.
    10. every fucking american politican is in it. wat u think u still live in 1900s when everything was so simple and peaceful? get out of ure utopia idiot and search ILLUMINATI.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UL5JXOHM5WO2TSCXPHDOBX36RM rverlohr
  • http://twitter.com/spacetowel Mike Frazier

    My favorite part about these comments is the truthers are making links to youtube and taking quotes off of other truther websites as “proof”. It’s exactly as John Hawkins said in the second paragraph.

  • http://twitter.com/spacetowel Mike Frazier

    My favorite part about these comments is the truthers are making links to youtube and taking quotes off of other truther websites as “proof”. It’s exactly as John Hawkins said in the second paragraph.

  • http://twitter.com/spacetowel Mike Frazier

    My favorite part about these comments is the truthers are making links to youtube and taking quotes off of other truther websites as “proof”. It’s exactly as John Hawkins said in the second paragraph.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1133194553 Clay Sarah

    I like how your little story got a -22 rating… thank god. “It starts out with a cuckoo theory promoted by crazy people and integrity-free professional con men who pump every conspiracy that comes down the line.”

    What kind of bullshit generalization is that?

  • http://twitter.com/inthumanpress WWW.ITHP.ORG
  • http://twitter.com/inthumanpress WWW.ITHP.ORG
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000204333046 Cameron Cosgrove

    4, u sure its even osama in those tapes? the “tapes” of osama contain a bunch of look alikes as well.
    5, the cia found itself innocent of selling cocaine to ricky ross on consignment in california in the 80′s(tho somehow all the local cops and ross himself new names to name and had documents proving transportation) and in general the government has never found itself guilty of anything until years and years later. it wasnt the bush administration but whoevers pulling the strings involved, and 9, aside from drug money (heroin, sale and slave labor in private prisons) and oil, wars usually lead to a time of economic boom, except bush fucked that up bad

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000204333046 Cameron Cosgrove

    4, u sure its even osama in those tapes? the “tapes” of osama contain a bunch of look alikes as well.
    5, the cia found itself innocent of selling cocaine to ricky ross on consignment in california in the 80′s(tho somehow all the local cops and ross himself new names to name and had documents proving transportation) and in general the government has never found itself guilty of anything until years and years later. it wasnt the bush administration but whoevers pulling the strings involved, and 9, aside from drug money (heroin, sale and slave labor in private prisons) and oil, wars usually lead to a time of economic boom, except bush fucked that up bad

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/Q3WI76APK2W4ISL57HB3VG7QUA Wiki

    Would the opposite of a Truther be a Liar?

    15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi Arabian. I’m still waiting for an explanation as to why we did not take “retaliatory action” against the nation most responsible for [the breeding of] the terrorists?

    But while the terrorists were Saudi, that doesn’t mean they were “supported’ by the Saudi government. If there’s a reasonable connection between these men and Iraqistan, I would love to hear it.

    It just fails to make any sense why we would attack Iraqistan when the attackers that caused our military intervention were Saudis. Unless Bush was bent on carrying out daddy’s revenge, we need the oil (and heroin?) security or Israel would benefit from the regional instability that the war(s) would create. I think it’s a combination, but I think that in no way is the safety of Americans factored into these responses.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/Q3WI76APK2W4ISL57HB3VG7QUA Wiki

    Would the opposite of a Truther be a Liar?

    15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi Arabian. I’m still waiting for an explanation as to why we did not take “retaliatory action” against the nation most responsible for [the breeding of] the terrorists?

    But while the terrorists were Saudi, that doesn’t mean they were “supported’ by the Saudi government. If there’s a reasonable connection between these men and Iraqistan, I would love to hear it.

    It just fails to make any sense why we would attack Iraqistan when the attackers that caused our military intervention were Saudis. Unless Bush was bent on carrying out daddy’s revenge, we need the oil (and heroin?) security or Israel would benefit from the regional instability that the war(s) would create. I think it’s a combination, but I think that in no way is the safety of Americans factored into these responses.

  • Anonymous

    John Hawkins should spend some time critically reading FOIA documents. Ever since the Spanish American war, it’s been a way of life for Washington to promulgate massive lies aimed directly at the American people, using the mass media of the day to get everybody hyped up for war. The Maine incident in Havana Harbor was a lie. Pretending not to know the Japanese fleet was on its way to Honolulu was another huge lie. The Gulf of Tonkin incident was a lie. The Al Qaida nexus in Iraq followed by the WMD debacle was double-down lie. Simply because there was a “Bush” in the White House on 9/11 only the incredibly naive or the complicit wouldn’t be totally outraged and vehemently insist on an investigation that was utterly independent of the US government. All of the Blue Ribbon investigative panels of the past have been truly sick jokes. Hawkins! It’s time to wake up!

  • Anonymous

    John Hawkins should spend some time critically reading FOIA documents. Ever since the Spanish American war, it’s been a way of life for Washington to promulgate massive lies aimed directly at the American people, using the mass media of the day to get everybody hyped up for war. The Maine incident in Havana Harbor was a lie. Pretending not to know the Japanese fleet was on its way to Honolulu was another huge lie. The Gulf of Tonkin incident was a lie. The Al Qaida nexus in Iraq followed by the WMD debacle was double-down lie. Simply because there was a “Bush” in the White House on 9/11 only the incredibly naive or the complicit wouldn’t be totally outraged and vehemently insist on an investigation that was utterly independent of the US government. All of the Blue Ribbon investigative panels of the past have been truly sick jokes. Hawkins! It’s time to wake up!

  • Anonymous

    “One thing that most people seem to miss is that these conspiracy theorists almost NEVER present any sort of coherent theory. They just ask questions, point out discrepancies, and demand that every single bit of uncertainty be answered to their satisfaction or else, the conspiracy MUST BE true.”

    Let us say someone is telling you a story about their day, and the things they say they did seem to violate the laws of nature/physics. You would probably (unless you are 5 years old and lack fully developed reasoning skills) at the very least ask them how they accomplished such reality-negating acts. For example, part of their story was that they traveled to the bank by hopping off of their roof onto their giant backyard trampoline; the result being that they landed near the bank. OK, this on its surface doesn’t seem all that unlikely provided they lived directly adjacent to said bank, but wait, this bank is 10 miles away from their home. Quite inconsistent from most of our interactions with reality, wouldn’t you say? Hell, this person could really be telling the truth, who knows whether or not aliens upgraded his trampoline in secret, or for that matter gave him super-powers. Regardless of what really happened you would wisely think twice about anything else this person tells you.

    The point I am trying to make is this; discrepancies in the explanations concerning events in which lives were lost DESERVE to be scrutinized if not merely for the truth, for the lives that were lost. Cops are ALL too familiar with people lying to cover up their misdeeds. Cops are lied to ALL the time. If they believed what people told them without scrutinizing glaring inconsistencies they’d never solve a single case.

    I’m not by any means endorsing any particular “truther” theory, I would however like to call bullshit on a few things. One of those things would be WTC building 7, watch the damn videos, the building collapses symmetrically as it drops with free-fall acceleration. The odds of that specific outcome for the demolition of the Solomon Brothers building taking place by chance under the 9-11 report’s published conditions are unforgivably remote.

    Here is an extremely simple experiment you can do to help you think about this; go out and buy the game “Jenga.” Now try and topple it symmetrically.

    I mean wow, its too bad there aren’t more fundamentalist Christians with a high school equivalent understanding of physics because what we have here looks like federally supported evidence of a damn miracle.

  • Anonymous

    “One thing that most people seem to miss is that these conspiracy theorists almost NEVER present any sort of coherent theory. They just ask questions, point out discrepancies, and demand that every single bit of uncertainty be answered to their satisfaction or else, the conspiracy MUST BE true.”

    Let us say someone is telling you a story about their day, and the things they say they did seem to violate the laws of nature/physics. You would probably (unless you are 5 years old and lack fully developed reasoning skills) at the very least ask them how they accomplished such reality-negating acts. For example, part of their story was that they traveled to the bank by hopping off of their roof onto their giant backyard trampoline; the result being that they landed near the bank. OK, this on its surface doesn’t seem all that unlikely provided they lived directly adjacent to said bank, but wait, this bank is 10 miles away from their home. Quite inconsistent from most of our interactions with reality, wouldn’t you say? Hell, this person could really be telling the truth, who knows whether or not aliens upgraded his trampoline in secret, or for that matter gave him super-powers. Regardless of what really happened you would wisely think twice about anything else this person tells you.

    The point I am trying to make is this; discrepancies in the explanations concerning events in which lives were lost DESERVE to be scrutinized if not merely for the truth, for the lives that were lost. Cops are ALL too familiar with people lying to cover up their misdeeds. Cops are lied to ALL the time. If they believed what people told them without scrutinizing glaring inconsistencies they’d never solve a single case.

    I’m not by any means endorsing any particular “truther” theory, I would however like to call bullshit on a few things. One of those things would be WTC building 7, watch the damn videos, the building collapses symmetrically as it drops with free-fall acceleration. The odds of that specific outcome for the demolition of the Solomon Brothers building taking place by chance under the 9-11 report’s published conditions are unforgivably remote.

    Here is an extremely simple experiment you can do to help you think about this; go out and buy the game “Jenga.” Now try and topple it symmetrically.

    I mean wow, its too bad there aren’t more fundamentalist Christians with a high school equivalent understanding of physics because what we have here looks like federally supported evidence of a damn miracle.

  • Anonymous

    “One thing that most people seem to miss is that these conspiracy theorists almost NEVER present any sort of coherent theory. They just ask questions, point out discrepancies, and demand that every single bit of uncertainty be answered to their satisfaction or else, the conspiracy MUST BE true.”

    Let us say someone is telling you a story about their day, and the things they say they did seem to violate the laws of nature/physics. You would probably (unless you are 5 years old and lack fully developed reasoning skills) at the very least ask them how they accomplished such reality-negating acts. For example, part of their story was that they traveled to the bank by hopping off of their roof onto their giant backyard trampoline; the result being that they landed near the bank. OK, this on its surface doesn’t seem all that unlikely provided they lived directly adjacent to said bank, but wait, this bank is 10 miles away from their home. Quite inconsistent from most of our interactions with reality, wouldn’t you say? Hell, this person could really be telling the truth, who knows whether or not aliens upgraded his trampoline in secret, or for that matter gave him super-powers. Regardless of what really happened you would wisely think twice about anything else this person tells you.

    The point I am trying to make is this; discrepancies in the explanations concerning events in which lives were lost DESERVE to be scrutinized if not merely for the truth, for the lives that were lost. Cops are ALL too familiar with people lying to cover up their misdeeds. Cops are lied to ALL the time. If they believed what people told them without scrutinizing glaring inconsistencies they’d never solve a single case.

    I’m not by any means endorsing any particular “truther” theory, I would however like to call bullshit on a few things. One of those things would be WTC building 7, watch the damn videos, the building collapses symmetrically as it drops with free-fall acceleration. The odds of that specific outcome for the demolition of the Solomon Brothers building taking place by chance under the 9-11 report’s published conditions are unforgivably remote.

    Here is an extremely simple experiment you can do to help you think about this; go out and buy the game “Jenga.” Now try and topple it symmetrically.

    I mean wow, its too bad there aren’t more fundamentalist Christians with a high school equivalent understanding of physics because what we have here looks like federally supported evidence of a damn miracle.

  • http://www.facebook.com/HawkOfLight Josh Albright

    This guy’s 10 questions really show how terrible of a critical thinker he is. I’m not a “truther”. I tend to think 9/11 probably was not directly planned by the US government in any official manner at least, but I don’t know and I don’t think it’s that important because we probably won’t ever find out all the pieces. I don’t need any single non publicly admitted conspiracy theory to prove the US government is a determent to humanity and commits thousands of atrocities.

    But I’ll answer these questions.

    1) This question is complete nonsense on the face of it. This guy has no understanding of deep black SAPs and compartmentalization. It would be possible to carry out 9/11 with a very small number of people that knew the whole picture. Most involved would not have any clue that they had been involved.

    2) “Some” truthers believe a missile hit the pentagon. Most of those believe a remote controlled plane was sent to fly toward the pentagon at the same time. There are some people who said they saw the plane fly past the building; then they heard the explosion.

    3) They never boarded the plane.

    4) Al-Qaeda is a pentagon controlled group. There is actually quite a lot of interesting evidence for this.

    5) These are not very objective groups. They hardly touched the WTC7 issue. It’s pathetic how so many mainstream groups are so trusting of government. No governments should be trusted. These are people that believe they can enforce through the point of a gun singular solutions that will work for 300 million Americans.

    6) Thermate paint.

    7) Why does this guy assume Rumsfeld? What the hell is this person smoking? There are millions of people who work for government and plenty of black programs that spin off with little to no oversight. Rumsfeld is just a puppet strung along in a bloated bureaucratic mess. Remember Rumsfeld was the one who a few days before 9/11 came forward and said: We misplaced 3 TRILLION DOLLARS.

    8) Bush was a gung-ho nutcase. I don’t think many truthers think he was involved in 9/11. Cheney.. who knows..

    9) Afghanistan is low reward? Didn’t you hear opium production has skyrocketed and the government has admitted to helping?

    10) Why the hell does this moron think that the few if any in the Bush administration involved in planning 9/11 would spread this information to the Obama administration?

  • http://www.facebook.com/HawkOfLight Josh Albright

    This guy’s 10 questions really show how terrible of a critical thinker he is. I’m not a “truther”. I tend to think 9/11 probably was not directly planned by the US government in any official manner at least, but I don’t know and I don’t think it’s that important because we probably won’t ever find out all the pieces. I don’t need any single non publicly admitted conspiracy theory to prove the US government is a determent to humanity and commits thousands of atrocities.

    But I’ll answer these questions.

    1) This question is complete nonsense on the face of it. This guy has no understanding of deep black SAPs and compartmentalization. It would be possible to carry out 9/11 with a very small number of people that knew the whole picture. Most involved would not have any clue that they had been involved.

    2) “Some” truthers believe a missile hit the pentagon. Most of those believe a remote controlled plane was sent to fly toward the pentagon at the same time. There are some people who said they saw the plane fly past the building; then they heard the explosion.

    3) They never boarded the plane.

    4) Al-Qaeda is a pentagon controlled group. There is actually quite a lot of interesting evidence for this.

    5) These are not very objective groups. They hardly touched the WTC7 issue. It’s pathetic how so many mainstream groups are so trusting of government. No governments should be trusted. These are people that believe they can enforce through the point of a gun singular solutions that will work for 300 million Americans.

    6) Thermate paint.

    7) Why does this guy assume Rumsfeld? What the hell is this person smoking? There are millions of people who work for government and plenty of black programs that spin off with little to no oversight. Rumsfeld is just a puppet strung along in a bloated bureaucratic mess. Remember Rumsfeld was the one who a few days before 9/11 came forward and said: We misplaced 3 TRILLION DOLLARS.

    8) Bush was a gung-ho nutcase. I don’t think many truthers think he was involved in 9/11. Cheney.. who knows..

    9) Afghanistan is low reward? Didn’t you hear opium production has skyrocketed and the government has admitted to helping?

    10) Why the hell does this moron think that the few if any in the Bush administration involved in planning 9/11 would spread this information to the Obama administration?

  • http://www.facebook.com/HawkOfLight Josh Albright

    This guy’s 10 questions really show how terrible of a critical thinker he is. I’m not a “truther”. I tend to think 9/11 probably was not directly planned by the US government in any official manner at least, but I don’t know and I don’t think it’s that important because we probably won’t ever find out all the pieces. I don’t need any single non publicly admitted conspiracy theory to prove the US government is a determent to humanity and commits thousands of atrocities.

    But I’ll answer these questions.

    1) This question is complete nonsense on the face of it. This guy has no understanding of deep black SAPs and compartmentalization. It would be possible to carry out 9/11 with a very small number of people that knew the whole picture. Most involved would not have any clue that they had been involved.

    2) “Some” truthers believe a missile hit the pentagon. Most of those believe a remote controlled plane was sent to fly toward the pentagon at the same time. There are some people who said they saw the plane fly past the building; then they heard the explosion.

    3) They never boarded the plane.

    4) Al-Qaeda is a pentagon controlled group. There is actually quite a lot of interesting evidence for this.

    5) These are not very objective groups. They hardly touched the WTC7 issue. It’s pathetic how so many mainstream groups are so trusting of government. No governments should be trusted. These are people that believe they can enforce through the point of a gun singular solutions that will work for 300 million Americans.

    6) Thermate paint.

    7) Why does this guy assume Rumsfeld? What the hell is this person smoking? There are millions of people who work for government and plenty of black programs that spin off with little to no oversight. Rumsfeld is just a puppet strung along in a bloated bureaucratic mess. Remember Rumsfeld was the one who a few days before 9/11 came forward and said: We misplaced 3 TRILLION DOLLARS.

    8) Bush was a gung-ho nutcase. I don’t think many truthers think he was involved in 9/11. Cheney.. who knows..

    9) Afghanistan is low reward? Didn’t you hear opium production has skyrocketed and the government has admitted to helping?

    10) Why the hell does this moron think that the few if any in the Bush administration involved in planning 9/11 would spread this information to the Obama administration?

  • http://www.facebook.com/HawkOfLight Josh Albright

    This guy’s 10 questions really show how terrible of a critical thinker he is. I’m not a “truther”. I tend to think 9/11 probably was not directly planned by the US government in any official manner at least, but I don’t know and I don’t think it’s that important because we probably won’t ever find out all the pieces. I don’t need any single non publicly admitted conspiracy theory to prove the US government is a determent to humanity and commits thousands of atrocities.

    But I’ll answer these questions.

    1) This question is complete nonsense on the face of it. This guy has no understanding of deep black SAPs and compartmentalization. It would be possible to carry out 9/11 with a very small number of people that knew the whole picture. Most involved would not have any clue that they had been involved.

    2) “Some” truthers believe a missile hit the pentagon. Most of those believe a remote controlled plane was sent to fly toward the pentagon at the same time. There are some people who said they saw the plane fly past the building; then they heard the explosion.

    3) They never boarded the plane.

    4) Al-Qaeda is a pentagon controlled group. There is actually quite a lot of interesting evidence for this.

    5) These are not very objective groups. They hardly touched the WTC7 issue. It’s pathetic how so many mainstream groups are so trusting of government. No governments should be trusted. These are people that believe they can enforce through the point of a gun singular solutions that will work for 300 million Americans.

    6) Thermate paint.

    7) Why does this guy assume Rumsfeld? What the hell is this person smoking? There are millions of people who work for government and plenty of black programs that spin off with little to no oversight. Rumsfeld is just a puppet strung along in a bloated bureaucratic mess. Remember Rumsfeld was the one who a few days before 9/11 came forward and said: We misplaced 3 TRILLION DOLLARS.

    8) Bush was a gung-ho nutcase. I don’t think many truthers think he was involved in 9/11. Cheney.. who knows..

    9) Afghanistan is low reward? Didn’t you hear opium production has skyrocketed and the government has admitted to helping?

    10) Why the hell does this moron think that the few if any in the Bush administration involved in planning 9/11 would spread this information to the Obama administration?

  • http://www.facebook.com/HawkOfLight Josh Albright

    *face palm* @ this entire article.

  • http://www.facebook.com/HawkOfLight Josh Albright

    *face palm* @ this entire article.

  • http://www.facebook.com/HawkOfLight Josh Albright

    *face palm* @ this entire article.

  • http://twitter.com/PsyWolf Zev Goldstein

    What I find telling is how none of the 9/11 truther’s responses actually give the same counter arguments. Like it says in the article, there is no real counter theory. Just people poking holes in the most likely scenario and no scientific evidence that actually disproves it. “Watch videos of buildings falling” is not proof. Sorry. Real scientific inquiry takes time and money, not just a few videos and some speculation.

  • Anonymous

    I read this title on digg and came here. I didn’t have high hopes with the website url of ‘rightwingnews’ but I have an open mind.

    The second paragraph is where Mr. Hawkins true article writing ability comes out. He seems to know exactly how a “conspiracy theory” arises.

    It’s the crazy people didn’t you know!

    As a professor of socio-governmental laws and their affect on their respectful citizens, I’d say that “conspiracy theories” arise when doubt is being doled out by the truckload.

    Mr. Hawkins you stand by the Bushes…your first mistake. They are corrupt, greedy, and filthy of the filthiest( with Condoleezaa Rice.) who seemed to MAKE money from 9/11…let me repeat that…George Bush, Condoleezza Rice made money (in the millions) from 9/11 and guess what else happened. our ‘security’ or ‘homeland defense’ was formed and given a huge pay boost.

    Wanna know the best defense? Knowledge. The government hindered the investigation, WTC 7 was never fully investigated even though it came down without an airplane hitting it. Just with these two facts, our entire population should knock down their door for answers.

    one last thing to blow a hole through your “fact based” article, The tape that shows Osama bin Laden admitting it…not Osama bin Laden sir…thats a proven fact, but probably news to you.

    Instead of working here, you should probably go to Fox News, I think you’d fit right in

  • Anonymous

    I read this title on digg and came here. I didn’t have high hopes with the website url of ‘rightwingnews’ but I have an open mind.

    The second paragraph is where Mr. Hawkins true article writing ability comes out. He seems to know exactly how a “conspiracy theory” arises.

    It’s the crazy people didn’t you know!

    As a professor of socio-governmental laws and their affect on their respectful citizens, I’d say that “conspiracy theories” arise when doubt is being doled out by the truckload.

    Mr. Hawkins you stand by the Bushes…your first mistake. They are corrupt, greedy, and filthy of the filthiest( with Condoleezaa Rice.) who seemed to MAKE money from 9/11…let me repeat that…George Bush, Condoleezza Rice made money (in the millions) from 9/11 and guess what else happened. our ‘security’ or ‘homeland defense’ was formed and given a huge pay boost.

    Wanna know the best defense? Knowledge. The government hindered the investigation, WTC 7 was never fully investigated even though it came down without an airplane hitting it. Just with these two facts, our entire population should knock down their door for answers.

    one last thing to blow a hole through your “fact based” article, The tape that shows Osama bin Laden admitting it…not Osama bin Laden sir…thats a proven fact, but probably news to you.

    Instead of working here, you should probably go to Fox News, I think you’d fit right in

  • Anonymous

    I read this title on digg and came here. I didn’t have high hopes with the website url of ‘rightwingnews’ but I have an open mind.

    The second paragraph is where Mr. Hawkins true article writing ability comes out. He seems to know exactly how a “conspiracy theory” arises.

    It’s the crazy people didn’t you know!

    As a professor of socio-governmental laws and their affect on their respectful citizens, I’d say that “conspiracy theories” arise when doubt is being doled out by the truckload.

    Mr. Hawkins you stand by the Bushes…your first mistake. They are corrupt, greedy, and filthy of the filthiest( with Condoleezaa Rice.) who seemed to MAKE money from 9/11…let me repeat that…George Bush, Condoleezza Rice made money (in the millions) from 9/11 and guess what else happened. our ‘security’ or ‘homeland defense’ was formed and given a huge pay boost.

    Wanna know the best defense? Knowledge. The government hindered the investigation, WTC 7 was never fully investigated even though it came down without an airplane hitting it. Just with these two facts, our entire population should knock down their door for answers.

    one last thing to blow a hole through your “fact based” article, The tape that shows Osama bin Laden admitting it…not Osama bin Laden sir…thats a proven fact, but probably news to you.

    Instead of working here, you should probably go to Fox News, I think you’d fit right in

  • Anonymous

    I read this title on digg and came here. I didn’t have high hopes with the website url of ‘rightwingnews’ but I have an open mind.

    The second paragraph is where Mr. Hawkins true article writing ability comes out. He seems to know exactly how a “conspiracy theory” arises.

    It’s the crazy people didn’t you know!

    As a professor of socio-governmental laws and their affect on their respectful citizens, I’d say that “conspiracy theories” arise when doubt is being doled out by the truckload.

    Mr. Hawkins you stand by the Bushes…your first mistake. They are corrupt, greedy, and filthy of the filthiest( with Condoleezaa Rice.) who seemed to MAKE money from 9/11…let me repeat that…George Bush, Condoleezza Rice made money (in the millions) from 9/11 and guess what else happened. our ‘security’ or ‘homeland defense’ was formed and given a huge pay boost.

    Wanna know the best defense? Knowledge. The government hindered the investigation, WTC 7 was never fully investigated even though it came down without an airplane hitting it. Just with these two facts, our entire population should knock down their door for answers.

    one last thing to blow a hole through your “fact based” article, The tape that shows Osama bin Laden admitting it…not Osama bin Laden sir…thats a proven fact, but probably news to you.

    Instead of working here, you should probably go to Fox News, I think you’d fit right in

  • Anonymous

    You’re asking the wrong questions, Mr. Hawkins. The right questions to ask are:

    1.) Why did THREE very tall buildings collapse at free-fall speed on 9/11 when only two buildings were struck by planes?

    2.) What caused the apparent mid-air pulverization and total destruction of 90,000 tons of metal and decking?

    3.) How can a mere gravitational collapse create huge pyroclastic clouds and launch multi-ton sections of steel laterally to a distance of 600 ft at 50 mph?

    4.) Why were no “pancaked floors” found?

    5.) Why doesn’t NIST respond to peer-reviewed papers revealing the presence of tons of explosive residue found in the dust?

    6.) Why does the testimonial evidence of 100 first-responders – detailed descriptions of multiple explosions, flashes of light, and huge pools of molten metal found under the ruins of all three buildings – continue to be ignored?

    7.) NIST attributes the collapse of all three buildings on 9/11 to fire damage. Previous to the attack on 9/11, no high-rise building in history had collapsed due to fire damage. The question follows, how likely is it that fire should cause the perfectly symmetrical collapse of three skyscrapers on the same day when deformity and partial collapse is so much more likely to have occurred?

    8.) Why are nearly 1500 architects and engineers willing to risk their reputations – risk there careers – to question the official conspiracy theory?

    9.) Like it or not, a lot of questions concerning the attack on 9/11 remain unanswered. Think about it. The attack and subsequent wars are responsible for the deaths of over 1.5 million people – many of whom were innocent men, women and children. And the attack and subsequent wars have cost the US tax payers $1,176,000,000,000 to date. And these huge and tragic numbers continue to rise daily. It follows, you and I – the American people – share the same profound moral responsibility to ask tough questions concerning the attack on 9/11. And, given the solemnity of this moment in history, what could possibly be wrong with asking tough questions?

    Will you continue to take refuge in incredulity, Mr Hawkins?
    Or, will you make room in your heart and mind for the truth and help us reopen the investigation into the attack on 9/11?

  • Anonymous

    You’re asking the wrong questions, Mr. Hawkins. The right questions to ask are:

    1.) Why did THREE very tall buildings collapse at free-fall speed on 9/11 when only two buildings were struck by planes?

    2.) What caused the apparent mid-air pulverization and total destruction of 90,000 tons of metal and decking?

    3.) How can a mere gravitational collapse create huge pyroclastic clouds and launch multi-ton sections of steel laterally to a distance of 600 ft at 50 mph?

    4.) Why were no “pancaked floors” found?

    5.) Why doesn’t NIST respond to peer-reviewed papers revealing the presence of tons of explosive residue found in the dust?

    6.) Why does the testimonial evidence of 100 first-responders – detailed descriptions of multiple explosions, flashes of light, and huge pools of molten metal found under the ruins of all three buildings – continue to be ignored?

    7.) NIST attributes the collapse of all three buildings on 9/11 to fire damage. Previous to the attack on 9/11, no high-rise building in history had collapsed due to fire damage. The question follows, how likely is it that fire should cause the perfectly symmetrical collapse of three skyscrapers on the same day when deformity and partial collapse is so much more likely to have occurred?

    8.) Why are nearly 1500 architects and engineers willing to risk their reputations – risk there careers – to question the official conspiracy theory?

    9.) Like it or not, a lot of questions concerning the attack on 9/11 remain unanswered. Think about it. The attack and subsequent wars are responsible for the deaths of over 1.5 million people – many of whom were innocent men, women and children. And the attack and subsequent wars have cost the US tax payers $1,176,000,000,000 to date. And these huge and tragic numbers continue to rise daily. It follows, you and I – the American people – share the same profound moral responsibility to ask tough questions concerning the attack on 9/11. And, given the solemnity of this moment in history, what could possibly be wrong with asking tough questions?

    Will you continue to take refuge in incredulity, Mr Hawkins?
    Or, will you make room in your heart and mind for the truth and help us reopen the investigation into the attack on 9/11?

  • Anonymous

    You’re asking the wrong questions, Mr. Hawkins. The right questions to ask are:

    1.) Why did THREE very tall buildings collapse at free-fall speed on 9/11 when only two buildings were struck by planes?

    2.) What caused the apparent mid-air pulverization and total destruction of 90,000 tons of metal and decking?

    3.) How can a mere gravitational collapse create huge pyroclastic clouds and launch multi-ton sections of steel laterally to a distance of 600 ft at 50 mph?

    4.) Why were no “pancaked floors” found?

    5.) Why doesn’t NIST respond to peer-reviewed papers revealing the presence of tons of explosive residue found in the dust?

    6.) Why does the testimonial evidence of 100 first-responders – detailed descriptions of multiple explosions, flashes of light, and huge pools of molten metal found under the ruins of all three buildings – continue to be ignored?

    7.) NIST attributes the collapse of all three buildings on 9/11 to fire damage. Previous to the attack on 9/11, no high-rise building in history had collapsed due to fire damage. The question follows, how likely is it that fire should cause the perfectly symmetrical collapse of three skyscrapers on the same day when deformity and partial collapse is so much more likely to have occurred?

    8.) Why are nearly 1500 architects and engineers willing to risk their reputations – risk there careers – to question the official conspiracy theory?

    9.) Like it or not, a lot of questions concerning the attack on 9/11 remain unanswered. Think about it. The attack and subsequent wars are responsible for the deaths of over 1.5 million people – many of whom were innocent men, women and children. And the attack and subsequent wars have cost the US tax payers $1,176,000,000,000 to date. And these huge and tragic numbers continue to rise daily. It follows, you and I – the American people – share the same profound moral responsibility to ask tough questions concerning the attack on 9/11. And, given the solemnity of this moment in history, what could possibly be wrong with asking tough questions?

    Will you continue to take refuge in incredulity, Mr Hawkins?
    Or, will you make room in your heart and mind for the truth and help us reopen the investigation into the attack on 9/11?

  • Anonymous

    You’re asking the wrong questions, Mr. Hawkins. The right questions to ask are:

    1.) Why did THREE very tall buildings collapse at free-fall speed on 9/11 when only two buildings were struck by planes?

    2.) What caused the apparent mid-air pulverization and total destruction of 90,000 tons of metal and decking?

    3.) How can a mere gravitational collapse create huge pyroclastic clouds and launch multi-ton sections of steel laterally to a distance of 600 ft at 50 mph?

    4.) Why were no “pancaked floors” found?

    5.) Why doesn’t NIST respond to peer-reviewed papers revealing the presence of tons of explosive residue found in the dust?

    6.) Why does the testimonial evidence of 100 first-responders – detailed descriptions of multiple explosions, flashes of light, and huge pools of molten metal found under the ruins of all three buildings – continue to be ignored?

    7.) NIST attributes the collapse of all three buildings on 9/11 to fire damage. Previous to the attack on 9/11, no high-rise building in history had collapsed due to fire damage. The question follows, how likely is it that fire should cause the perfectly symmetrical collapse of three skyscrapers on the same day when deformity and partial collapse is so much more likely to have occurred?

    8.) Why are nearly 1500 architects and engineers willing to risk their reputations – risk there careers – to question the official conspiracy theory?

    9.) Like it or not, a lot of questions concerning the attack on 9/11 remain unanswered. Think about it. The attack and subsequent wars are responsible for the deaths of over 1.5 million people – many of whom were innocent men, women and children. And the attack and subsequent wars have cost the US tax payers $1,176,000,000,000 to date. And these huge and tragic numbers continue to rise daily. It follows, you and I – the American people – share the same profound moral responsibility to ask tough questions concerning the attack on 9/11. And, given the solemnity of this moment in history, what could possibly be wrong with asking tough questions?

    Will you continue to take refuge in incredulity, Mr Hawkins?
    Or, will you make room in your heart and mind for the truth and help us reopen the investigation into the attack on 9/11?

  • http://profiles.google.com/josh.durey Josh Durey

    6.) “Why in the world would they wire the buildings with explosives and THEN fly planes into the buildings? ”

    Because otherwise, the TSA wouldn’t be able to get millions of Americans to agree to illegal search and seizure. You don’t take away freedoms all at once–step-by-step is the way to do it.

  • http://profiles.google.com/josh.durey Josh Durey

    6.) “Why in the world would they wire the buildings with explosives and THEN fly planes into the buildings? ”

    Because otherwise, the TSA wouldn’t be able to get millions of Americans to agree to illegal search and seizure. You don’t take away freedoms all at once–step-by-step is the way to do it.

  • http://profiles.google.com/josh.durey Josh Durey

    6.) “Why in the world would they wire the buildings with explosives and THEN fly planes into the buildings? ”

    Because otherwise, the TSA wouldn’t be able to get millions of Americans to agree to illegal search and seizure. You don’t take away freedoms all at once–step-by-step is the way to do it.

  • http://profiles.google.com/josh.durey Josh Durey

    6.) “Why in the world would they wire the buildings with explosives and THEN fly planes into the buildings? ”

    Because otherwise, the TSA wouldn’t be able to get millions of Americans to agree to illegal search and seizure. You don’t take away freedoms all at once–step-by-step is the way to do it.

  • http://profiles.google.com/josh.durey Josh Durey

    6.) “Why in the world would they wire the buildings with explosives and THEN fly planes into the buildings? ”

    Because otherwise, the TSA wouldn’t be able to get millions of Americans to agree to illegal search and seizure. You don’t take away freedoms all at once–step-by-step is the way to do it.

  • http://profiles.google.com/righteousjester Righteous Jester

    /Fail @John Hawkins. You clearly pulled this article out your @rse. I love point 3. I guess the people on the plane were asked to keep quiet, and are being looked after on a tropical island. The government wouldn’t simply kill them, that would be cruel and immoral, like bringing down a building full of people.

  • Pingback: textile news

  • Pingback: garment business daily

  • Pingback: Benito Peleg

  • Pingback: iphone 5 news

  • Pingback: www.chase.com

  • Pingback: Scrapebox VPS Hosting

  • Pingback: Develop Succesful Abs

  • Pingback: Buzz Marketing

  • Pingback: bowel

  • Pingback: burn fat

  • Pingback: geld verdienen mit website

  • Pingback: Anti Aging Creams

  • Pingback: A Blog - Informatica

  • Pingback: Los Angeles Dental Bonding

  • Pingback: Android Apps

  • Pingback: google local business consultant

  • Pingback: Jessie

  • Pingback: car hire costa rica

  • Pingback: benten games

  • Pingback: roi unlimited review

  • Pingback: cream anti aging

  • Pingback: Liebeszauber

  • Pingback: how to get your ex girlfriend back

  • Pingback: Christmas Story Leg Lamp

  • Pingback: Muskelaufbau

  • Pingback: autism resources los angeles

  • Pingback: Look at this

  • Pingback: inspirational

  • Pingback: Erotik Markt

  • Pingback: huntsville home improvement

  • Pingback: Arizona Schools

  • Pingback: web design dvd

  • Pingback: Kittie Susswein

  • Pingback: tip for interview

  • Pingback: Elk Grove Website Design

  • Pingback: geburtstagsgeschenke

  • Pingback: all internet marketing

  • Pingback: online reputation

  • Pingback: write a resume objective

  • Pingback: Jessica

  • Pingback: Mikio Yuvutu

  • Pingback: reverse phone directory

  • Pingback: Tomi Yuoporn

  • Pingback: apply for a credit card with bad credit

  • Pingback: 2011

  • Pingback: Beat Making Software

  • Pingback: beat maker software

  • Pingback: Yolk Chicago

  • Pingback: replica watches

  • Pingback: porn sex hot sluts

  • Pingback: Property Insurance

  • Pingback: LiveJournal Blog

  • Pingback: TVonline

  • Pingback: wow gold

  • Pingback: mmo glider

  • Pingback: Royal Savoy Sharm El Sheikht

  • Pingback: all internet marketing

  • Pingback: SBOBET

  • Pingback: 7M

  • Pingback: SBO

  • Pingback: SBOBET

  • Pingback: keretood

  • Pingback: SBO

  • Pingback: value my car

  • Pingback: Wood Router

  • Pingback: kelly

  • Pingback: pokeren op internet

  • Pingback: how to get into modeling

  • Pingback: Cooking Games

  • Pingback: penny auctions

  • Pingback: sell my car staffordshire

  • Pingback: Advokat Uppsala

  • Pingback: http://www.victims-blog.com/some-blog-post

  • Pingback: good ways to make money

  • Pingback: Home Security Systems

  • Pingback: Penis Extender

  • Pingback: July Technology Blog

  • Pingback: mcdonalds menu

  • Pingback: online health home remedies

  • Pingback: preworkout supplement

  • Pingback: OPM

  • Pingback: flv

  • Pingback: removable wall stickers

  • Pingback: magic submitter review

  • Pingback: Xbox 360 4 GB Console With Kinect

  • Pingback: Ninja Kitchen

  • Pingback: public liability

  • Pingback: vitamins

  • Pingback: mosquito netting

  • Pingback: suspender tights

  • Pingback: online payday loans

  • Pingback: website design norfolk

  • Pingback: Online Penny Auctions

  • Pingback: The Waggoners Trucking

  • Pingback: Silver For Sale

  • Pingback: Another Blog Title

  • Pingback: 1000 calorie diet

  • Pingback: plumbing supplies online

  • Pingback: Discount Lift Tickets

  • Pingback: Alfred Johnson quantum international

  • Pingback: rc airplanes

  • Pingback: Wow Gold

  • Pingback: solicitors maidstone

  • Pingback: Aumento dos Seios

  • Pingback: cenob1te

  • Pingback: Articles about healthy eating

  • Pingback: fantasy books for children

  • Pingback: audacity download

  • Pingback: unlimited

  • Pingback: adventureworld cheats

  • Pingback: Alfred Johnson Houston

  • Pingback: Plumber Medway

  • Pingback: seo in kent

  • Pingback: Air Compressor Reviews

  • Pingback: where can i buy a kindle

  • Pingback: podiatrist in aiken

  • Pingback: wii cheapest price

  • Pingback: escort

  • Pingback: Lethbridge Tutoring

  • Pingback: montre gps running

  • Pingback: meat slicer reviews

  • Pingback: The Overnight Cash System

  • Pingback: photo into a painting

  • Pingback: Iplayer Abroad

  • Pingback: Forum Grey Hat

  • Pingback: fly fishing trips

  • Pingback: direct heating and cooling cape coral

  • Pingback: http://online-electronic-store.com/lg-voyager-vx10000-titanium-cell-phone-for-verizon-wireless-with-no-contract-refurbished-in-brand-new-housing-and-30-day-sellers-warranty-2079/

  • Pingback: advertising agency

  • Pingback: free psp themes

  • Pingback: How To Resources

  • Pingback: diet for lose weight

  • Pingback: kroger coupons

  • Pingback: cool wedding

  • Pingback: Classifieds

  • Pingback: Scrapebox

  • Pingback: painting company Eden Prairie

  • Pingback: ginkgo biloba for tinnitus

  • Pingback: My Blog Title

  • Pingback: Muscle gain for each one

  • Pingback: lasik surgery

  • Pingback: ceramic watches for women

  • Pingback: montre hello kitty

  • Pingback: SEO Website Services

  • Pingback: ipad 2 leather covers

  • Pingback: Course Management Software

  • Pingback: Inflammation

  • Pingback: Sell Digital Goods

  • Pingback: Heavy duty truck tires

  • Pingback: Course Marketing

  • Pingback: Lead Generation Solutions

  • Pingback: game changer dna bonuses

  • Pingback: Nail Lacquer

  • Pingback: IFRS Certificate Course

  • Pingback: Loch Lomond Lodges

  • Pingback: body temple

  • Pingback: Jack3d

  • Pingback: iPulseOximeter

  • Pingback: get rid of acne scars

  • Pingback: LG Infinia 47LW6500 black friday

  • Pingback: iPad 3

  • Pingback: pre workout meal

  • Pingback: football tips

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: medicine

  • Pingback: site

  • Pingback: no download mmorpg

  • Pingback: Barlow Beaded Collar

  • Pingback: keeping family healthy

  • Pingback: Another Blog Title

  • Pingback: locksmith

  • Pingback: uggs

  • Pingback: Www.greenpeople.co.uk

  • Pingback: jam kw

  • Pingback: Linkaufbau

  • Pingback: MRR & PLR Pack

  • Pingback: battlefield 3

  • Pingback: lingerie

  • Pingback: freebies

  • Pingback: sewa mobil murah di bali

  • Pingback: decodeur tnt satellite

  • Pingback: Warcraft Guides

  • Pingback: sim only deals

  • Pingback: christmas jumpers

  • Pingback: resume objective

  • Pingback: paintless dent removal

  • Pingback: recreational land

  • Pingback: resume objective

  • Pingback: Modern Wedding Invitations

  • Pingback: book template

  • Pingback: Capitec Bank Loans

  • Pingback: Plane Tickets

  • Pingback: vind penge online

  • Pingback: el gordo

  • Pingback: Avon products

  • Pingback: velos enfants

  • Pingback: bahamas charter flights

  • Pingback: Unlimited Web Hosting

  • Pingback: garmin forerunner 305

  • Pingback: ipoker rakeback

  • Pingback: Cheap HDMI cable

  • Pingback: new skin care products

  • Pingback: Mira hair oil reviews

  • Pingback: Invitation Paper

  • Pingback: My Blog Title

  • Pingback: Las Vegas car accident attorney

  • Pingback: Disney World packages

  • Pingback: calgary mortgage brokers

  • Pingback: iphone 5 features

  • Pingback: retrofit

  • Pingback: montre automatique homme

  • Pingback: london catering

  • Pingback: Lazertag System 2pk

  • Pingback: Affordable Wedding Invitations

  • Pingback: Memphis Real Estate

  • Pingback: Glee Season 3 Episode 13

  • Pingback: Lady Gaga Halloween costume

  • Pingback: Seedbox

  • Pingback: professional book template

  • Pingback: leather steerinG wheel covers

  • Pingback: hair system

  • Pingback: book template

  • Pingback: Christmas Party Invitations

  • Pingback: sexy halloween costumes

  • Pingback: how to get a boyfriend

  • Pingback: roof materials

  • Pingback: getting a good night sleep

  • Pingback: disque dur externe ssd

  • Pingback: make money

  • Pingback: luxury apartments marbella

  • Pingback: Canon 60D Black Friday

  • Pingback: muscle gaining secrets review

  • Pingback: airtight containers

  • Pingback: MAN CATSII

  • Pingback: social media management

  • Pingback: link building services

  • Pingback: marijuana abuse intervention

  • Pingback: SEO IN LOS ANGELES

  • Pingback: friends with benefits

  • Pingback: swiss men

  • Pingback: casque bluetooth

  • Pingback: caisson de basse voiture

  • Pingback: returning resident visa

  • Pingback: Birthday Invitations

  • Pingback: booking tiket

  • Pingback: Envelopes

  • Pingback: Bangladesh News

  • Pingback: David Lerner Associates

  • Pingback: Man and Van: The Company for you

  • Pingback: Birthday Invitations

  • Pingback: ortodontie

  • Pingback: Tooth fairy costume

  • Pingback: Free iPhone 4

  • Pingback: Cowboy Millionaire Review

  • Pingback: f86 edf

  • Pingback: robotmultifonction.net

  • Pingback: life insurance quotes

  • Pingback: LED Bulbs

  • Pingback: womens ceramic watches

  • Pingback: sciatica exercises

  • Pingback: how to buy fans

  • Pingback: iphone 5

  • Pingback: robot menager multifonction

  • Pingback: belly dance

  • Pingback: Duct Cleaning Prior Lake

  • Pingback: wholesale flowers

  • Pingback: Buy Gold Seattle

  • Pingback: mailing list tips

  • Pingback: My Blog Title

  • Pingback: Minecraft IPs

  • Pingback: LG TV Black Friday

  • Pingback: Wasp Nest Removal

  • Pingback: Nikon D7000 Black Friday

  • Pingback: best pre workout ingredients

  • Pingback: News

  • Pingback: Chaldean

  • Pingback: iphone 5 features

  • Pingback: metal roof installation

  • Pingback: knight bounce house fort worth tx

  • Pingback: penny auction

  • Pingback: scrapebox autoapprove list

  • Pingback: weight loss foods

  • Pingback: security system

  • Pingback: inflatable screens

  • Pingback: easy home based business

  • Pingback: flash player download

  • Pingback: surveys

  • Pingback: bonus

  • Pingback: decodeur tnt hd

  • Pingback: machine a biere

  • Pingback: plaque induction

  • Pingback: chicago montessori

  • Pingback: chicago montessori

  • Pingback: chanel ceramic watch

  • Pingback: tente de camping

  • Pingback: Voodoo

  • Pingback: scalpel blades

  • Pingback: work from home

  • Pingback: Little Girl Costumes

  • Pingback: where to buy radio control airplane

  • Pingback: macintosh training london

  • Pingback: Overstock Coupons

  • Pingback: microsoft excel 2007 training

  • Pingback: Spray Foam Insulation

  • Pingback: lit parapluie pas cher

  • Pingback: the easy way to stop smoking by allen carr

  • Pingback: letting agents hove

  • Pingback: parc bebe

  • Pingback: Affiliate Revenue

  • Pingback: Double Glazing

  • Pingback: certified nursing assistant certification

  • Pingback: iphone 5 free

  • Pingback: internet business services

  • Pingback: lhl concepts

  • Pingback: free sex chat

  • Pingback: epilateur electrique sans douleur

  • Pingback: Nitric oxide supplements

  • Pingback: help desk solution software

  • Pingback: Sky Lantern

  • Pingback: table à langer pas cher

  • Pingback: poubelle automatique

  • Pingback: Thomas Hack

  • Pingback: Sex Cams

  • Pingback: tables basses

  • Pingback: Todd cardin

  • Pingback: Todd cardin

  • Pingback: conseguir enlaces

  • Pingback: ZOMGBBQPIZZA

  • Pingback: Free Downloads

  • Pingback: electric cigarettes

  • Pingback: Blog Comment Links

  • Pingback: autoradio dvd gps

  • Pingback: site

  • Pingback: casque audio sans fil

  • Pingback: casque sans fil

  • Pingback: http://www.gpsmoto.org/

  • Pingback: site

  • Pingback: tireuse à bière

  • Pingback: anthony blumberg

  • Pingback: My Blog Title

  • Pingback: Naples Real Estate

  • Pingback: Look at this

  • Pingback: Another Blog Title

  • Pingback: My Blog Title

  • Pingback: Painters in Dallas Texas

  • Pingback: imprimante wifi

  • Pingback: Another Blog Title

  • Pingback: telephone fixe

  • Pingback: Leprechaun Costumes

  • Pingback: Birthday Invitations

  • Pingback: Water Damage Chandler

  • Pingback: Water Damage Mesa

  • Pingback: imprimante laser couleur

  • Pingback: cafetiere expresso

  • Pingback: tablette graphique

  • Pingback: cardiofrequencemetre

  • Pingback: four micro onde pas cher

  • Pingback: alliance diamant tour complet

  • Pingback: bague solitaire diamant

  • Pingback: trancheuse à jambon

  • Pingback: aspirateur balai rowenta

  • Pingback: bla bla black

  • Pingback: platine vinyle usb

  • Pingback: barbecue electrique

  • Pingback: friteuse sans huile seb actifry

  • Pingback: echelletelescopique.org

  • Pingback: pompe a biere

  • Pingback: hachoir a viande

  • Pingback: bureau enfant pas cher

  • Pingback: site

  • Pingback: semenax

  • Pingback: reflex numérique

  • Pingback: trancheuse electrique

  • Pingback: cv writer

  • Pingback: bague solitaire

  • Pingback: chaise de bureau

  • Pingback: brosse a dent electrique oral b

  • Pingback: business card maker

  • Pingback: best mac games

  • Pingback: cook chocolate recipes

  • Pingback: Thomas Hack

  • Pingback: animal lovers dating

  • Pingback: rasoir electrique homme

  • Pingback: Warez Downloads

  • Pingback: Wedding Invitations

  • Pingback: Download a Beat Generator

  • Pingback: Baby Shower Invitations

  • Pingback: New Horoscope Signs

  • Pingback: water softener

  • Pingback: codigo da estrada

  • Pingback: chaise de bar

  • Pingback: Partnerzusammenführung

  • Pingback: Liebeskummer

  • Pingback: rasoir electrique

  • Pingback: pressure washing roswell

  • Pingback: XtremeNO

  • Pingback: Baseball Sunglasses

  • Pingback: trampoline pas cher

  • Pingback: the diet solution recipes

  • Pingback: Doors

  • Pingback: webcam sex

  • Pingback: forerunner305.fr

  • Pingback: visalus body by vi

  • Pingback: The College Network

  • Pingback: framing basement walls

  • Pingback: Inspired By Nature

  • Pingback: increase traffic

  • Pingback: free bdsm videos

  • Pingback: Black Titanium Watches

  • Pingback: My Blog Title

  • Pingback: Horror Movies

  • Pingback: My Blog Title

  • Pingback: Discount

  • Pingback: mini cooper price

  • Pingback: spy cameras

  • Pingback: Best Autoclave Pouches

  • Pingback: Velcro Badges

  • Pingback: buy exam gloves

  • Pingback: how to host minecraft server

  • Pingback: obagi reviews

  • Pingback: study lov

  • Pingback: ownlook

  • Pingback: pénzkeresés

  • Pingback: UK Accountants

  • Pingback: cheapest payday loans sites

  • Pingback: payday loans no credit check

  • Pingback: Buy Youtube Likes

  • Pingback: balance card credit interest low transfer

  • Pingback: Martinsburg

  • Pingback: Body Kit

  • Pingback: dual sim android mobile phones

  • Pingback: chemical fabrics

  • Pingback: fame

  • Pingback: How To Draw A Rose

  • Pingback: Transportation to Sweden

  • Pingback: http://mgmtwitter.com

  • Pingback: kindle books

  • Pingback: doggies

  • Pingback: Rotomolding

  • Pingback: plumbing service sacramento

  • Pingback: car hire gatwick airport

  • Pingback: photo frame sizes

  • Pingback: lindexed service

  • Pingback: best attorney

  • Pingback: Travestis

  • Pingback: Used Cisco Equipment

  • Pingback: http://www.howmuchdotheyweigh.com/annasophia-robb-weight/

  • Pingback: acne treatment

  • Pingback: menopause symptoms

  • Pingback: dating events

  • Pingback: Silver Jewelry

  • Pingback: bins

  • Pingback: Plan Your Financial Future with Malaysia First Financial Planning Portal

  • Pingback: financial planner Brisbane

  • Pingback: divorce lawyers in pittsburgh

  • Pingback: anket doldur para kazan

  • Pingback: 90дневна диета

  • Pingback: Oxyelite Pro Results

  • Pingback: site brasileiro nos eua

  • Pingback: More Traffic

  • Pingback: iowa fsbo

  • Pingback: clear skin

  • Pingback: best singer in the world

  • Pingback: how to become a paralegal assistant

  • Pingback: mini storage

  • Pingback: investor relations firm

  • Pingback: diet pills that work fast

  • Pingback: diet pills

  • Pingback: Sex Escort in Berlin

  • Pingback: social bookmarking sites

  • Pingback: Buy Facebook Fans

  • Pingback: Best Gifts Christmas 2010

  • Pingback: beginning running

  • Pingback: facebook poker

  • Pingback: bespoke wardrobes

  • Pingback: florida no fault insurance

  • Pingback: Bodybuilding Forum

  • Pingback: toys

  • Pingback: free iPhone

  • Pingback: Scott Tucker

  • Pingback: Scott Tucker

  • Pingback: flats in ooty

  • Pingback: Scott Tucker

  • Pingback: Scott Tucker

  • Pingback: Scott Tucker

  • Pingback: international calling cards

  • Pingback: Fitness Tips

  • Pingback: penny car auction site

  • Pingback: Cargills Sri Lanka

  • Pingback: theme parks

  • Pingback: dottie s weight loss zone

  • Pingback: how to get your ex back

  • Pingback: Free DVD Ripper

  • Pingback: how to get clear skin

  • Pingback: watch movies online

  • Pingback: natural remedies for menopause

  • Pingback: Scott Tucker

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: flats in ooty

  • Pingback: bathtub drain repair

  • Pingback: .

  • Pingback: Tommiekiddy Entertainment

  • Pingback: fashion nurse uniforms scrubs Denver Colorado

  • Pingback: tea kettle

  • Pingback: chime lodge float trip

  • Pingback: Jump higher in sports

  • Pingback: Best Tips for Golf Drives

  • Pingback: NYC Event Planning

  • Pingback: tea kettle

  • Pingback: art

  • Pingback: japanese auctions

  • Pingback: contact paper

  • Pingback: ipad

  • Pingback: western purses

  • Pingback: chairs

  • Pingback: Dr Michele Green

  • Pingback: backlink generator

  • Pingback: Best Appetite Suppressant

  • Pingback: far infrared sauna

  • Pingback: Protoss Build Order

  • Pingback: Another Blog Title

  • Pingback: Cleaning Services Glasgow

  • Pingback: forum für verantwortung

  • Pingback: Sell Your Car For FREE

  • Pingback: Joe

  • Pingback: car stereo installation san diego

  • Pingback: Diamond Drilling

  • Pingback: mobiele telefonie en voip

  • Pingback: Prestashop Templates

  • Pingback: Open24

  • Pingback: pc tools antivirus

  • Pingback: world of warcraft

  • Pingback: foundation repairs York IN

  • Pingback: Miami wedding photographers

  • Pingback: android bionic

  • Pingback: bedbathandbeyond-coupons

  • Pingback: residential window film

  • Pingback: Magnetic Generator

  • Pingback: Noel 2011

  • Pingback: Online Website Marketing

  • Pingback: Real Estate Omaha NE

  • Pingback: dishwasher film

  • Pingback: Glacier Bay faucets

  • Pingback: battlefield 3 guide

  • Pingback: ipad 2

  • Pingback: Travel Agencies Directory - TourismRendezVous.com

  • Pingback: Hippie Clothes

  • Pingback: Gigasphere

  • Pingback: internet marketing SEO

  • Pingback: wine broker jobs

  • Pingback: Eco Friendly

  • Pingback: Indica

  • Pingback: webcam sex

  • Pingback: diapers sale

  • Pingback: AKO

  • Pingback: Home Acne Treatment

  • Pingback: bonsai tree soil store

  • Pingback: uae offshore company

  • Pingback: targeted website traffic

  • Pingback: Forex-Handel

  • Pingback: sacramento personal injury attorney

  • Pingback: jewellery for children

  • Pingback: frostwire

  • Pingback: audio leads

  • Pingback: ipad

  • Pingback: vacations to fiji

  • Pingback: CPA Sites

  • Pingback: bodybuilding training software

  • Pingback: Douglas McGregors Theory X and Theory Y

  • Pingback: Hearing

  • Pingback: tax refunds uk

  • Pingback: My Dream Wedding

  • Pingback: Divorce Attorney Carlsbad

  • Pingback: reprx

  • Pingback: cheap shutter

  • Pingback: machinery financing

  • Pingback: cheap refrigerators

  • Pingback: plasma tv

  • Pingback: life coaching Chicago

  • Pingback: ipad 2

  • Pingback: treadmills

  • Pingback: car accident racing injury blog

  • Pingback: how to win the lottery greatest system

  • Pingback: Caribbean travel

  • Pingback: maqui berries

  • Pingback: handmade buzz

  • Pingback: dieting

  • Pingback: Prsteny

  • Pingback: coupons

  • Pingback: 3d butterfly wall art

  • Pingback: Zebra skin rug

  • Pingback: 5G Phones

  • Pingback: swtor tester

  • Pingback: how to transfer money from one bank to another

  • Pingback: digital printing on fabric

  • Pingback: weight loss supplements

  • Pingback: cover letters

  • Pingback: resume

  • Pingback: used cars

  • Pingback: American Mensa

  • Pingback: Middlebury CT boat storage

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info
Features
Archives Best of RWN Humor John Hawkins Interviews Quotes Special to RWN