For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
GOP Votes To Defund EPA On Light Bulb Enforcement
Written By : William Teach

Funny how this news was lost in the shuffle Friday, and I had to go to a British newspaper to find out

Republicans claimed to have struck a blow for freedom on Friday when the House of Representatives voted to strip all funding from government programmes promoting energy-saving lightbulbs.

The measure, brought as an amendment to an energy spending bill by the Texas Republican Michael Burgess, bars the federal government from using any funds to enforce improved lighting efficiency standards.

In his remarks, Burgess cast the conservation of the old-fashioned 100 watt lightbulb as a burning issue of personal freedom.

“The federal government has no right to tell me or any other citizen what type of lightbulb to use at home. It is our right to choose,” he told the House.

Obama and Senate Democrats have already stated that they prefer to come down on the side of Big Government and reduced freedoms, and will not support the measure.

The Guardian also attempts to turn this into some sort of sop to the TEA Party, rather than Republicans simply standing up for consumer choice. But, remember, for the Left, choice is only good when it comes to giving women the power to abort babies.

0
  • http://wlso.fm/wordpress/ Uncleshag

    How many light bulbs does it take to change a government? Ha! Every idea I have is incandescent.

    • Martin Hale

      How many light bulbs does it take to change a government?

      So you’re proposing that the villagers carry lightbulbs with their pitchforks instead of torches, then?

      • http://wlso.fm/wordpress/ Uncleshag

        Sure, Martin. Illuminate any way you choose.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michelle-Hart/100001365605444 Michelle Hart

          “I should take a flamethrower to this place!”

          I would go the Al Pachino route….

  • JoeBritton

    Big win, not only for the GOP, but for the oil and coal companies, which may now continue to pump toxic fumes into the air at the same rate as before creating electricity. Corporate medicine will also appreciate the effort since lung, heart, and other pollution related diseases should continue at the same rate.

  • Anonymous

    “The federal government has no right to tell me or any other citizen
    what type of lightbulb to use at home. It is our right to choose,” he
    told the House.

    Well you see the right to choose is only a good thing when you choose correctly.  Otherwise the government must intervene to persuade you to choose better.

    For your own good of course.  And really, won’t you be much happier if you’re forced to choose the right path every time?

  • NotTheDickNixonIs

    You folks must go crazy when driving, what with all that government regulation telling you how fast to drive, where to stop, etc.

    And who needs seat belts, or some consistency in the placement of turn signals, or airbags.

    Corporate America knows what is best…for profits, but not what is best for us.

    • gfchicago

      Toastrider posted this yesterday, and he is right according to the research that I’ve done.

      If you run the numbers, whatever energy savings you get from using CFLs is completely devoured by the energy and resources needed to manufacture and dispose of them.

      Again: CFLs HAVE MERCURY IN THEM. MERCURY IS BAD FOR YOU, DIPSHITS.

      You break an incandescent, you’ve got some bits of glass and metal to sweep up. Annoying but not a serious problem.

      Break a CFL and it’s instant Hazmat problem.

      So you would have us use something that is more detrimental  to humans and the environment not to mention more expensive, just to please your progressive slave masters?

      So shut up NotTheDickNixon, oh and Obummer says to eat your peas.

      • Toastrider

        I’m surprised Fincher hasn’t come over here to tell you to learn your shit too.

    • Anonymous

      Corporate America knows what is best…for profits, but not what is best for us.

      Yep.  Generous Electric was a major lobbyist for the incandescent ban.  Most incandescents are mede abroad, and they are trying to get back into the game.

      Personally, I use both, each in its best application.

      whatever energy savings you get from using CFLs is completely devoured
      by the energy and resources needed to manufacture and dispose of them.

      I just dispose of them by throwing them out the car window at night.  Preferably in front of the elementary school.

    • http://www.thepiratescove.us/ William_Teach

      So, youhave no incandescent bulbs at home, right?

  • Pingback: House of Eratosthenes

  • Anonymous

    http://wlso.fm/wordpress/ Uncleshag

    How many light bulbs does it take to change a government?

    THREAD WINNER!

  • JoeBritton

    Teach doesn’t like to be contradicted, because he gives us all the truth. Here is some more”


    U.S. Republicans are ignoring lessons from the Depression

    By Robert S. McElvaineFri Jul 15 20110 … But the drastic cuts in federal spending that some Republicans are demanding in exchange for an increase in the debt ceiling would be a repeat of the mistakes that prevented a full recovery in the 1930s and then caused a secondary collapse in 1937. Enacting these cuts is the most likely scenario in which the current recession could become a new depression.”What does this have to do with the issue of lightbulbs? I don’t know but minimally it would seem to make the issue trivial. But then again, the GOP is searching wide for some issue to take Obama down, and why not lightbulbs. (Oh, why do I bother with this site?)

    • gfchicago

      You have it exactly ass backwards.

      From FDR’s on Treasury Secretary:

      http://tinyurl.com/bnwlhc

      The words are those of none other than Henry Morgenthau Jr. — close friend, lunch companion, loyal secretary of the Treasury to President Franklin D. Roosevelt — and key architect of FDR’s New Deal.

      The date: May 9, 1939. The setting: Morgenthau’s appearance in Washington before less influential Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee.
      Morgenthau made this “startling confession,” as historian Burton W. Folsom Jr. calls it, during the seventh year of FDR’s New Deal programs to combat the rampant unemployment of the Great Depression.
      “In these words, Morgenthau summarized a decade of disaster, especially during the years Roosevelt was in power. Indeed average unemployment for the whole year in 1939 would be higher than that in 1931, the year before Roosevelt captured the presidency from Herbert Hoover,” Folsom writes in his new book, “New Deal or Raw Deal?: How FDR’s Economic Legacy Has Damaged America.”

      Indeed, with those words, Morgenthau confessed what so many keepers of FDR’s flame won’t admit today: The New Deal was failed public policy. Massive spending on public works programs didn’t erase historic unemployment. It didn’t produce a recovery.

      (Oh, why do I bother with this site?)

      Yes, why do you bother with this site?  All you manage to do is spout Marxist drivel and disrupt, are you trying to convince us or yourself?

      So shut up and eat your peas!!!

      By the way flagged for being a banned poster.

      • Anonymous

        I’m sorry to say wrong wrong about the ass backwards statement. Janzillysweetgaldbritton is just following the liberal standard for all facts that don’t fit the marxist ideal. Denial and deflection. If your facts are wrong just ignore the facts,right janzillysweetgaldbritton? Oh flagged for being a banned troll.

        • JoeBritton

          Well, thanks but you said nothing about the Republican mess I discussed. Deflection and ad hominem.

        • JoeBritton

          flagged for liking incandescent lightbulbs but not knowing why.

      • JoeBritton

        Okay so another Democratic president failed to clean up the mess of another Republican president, Hoover, in short order. So who do you blame. And who is it you believe can clean up the mess of that Republican president? Yes, another one.

        What incredible inanity.

    • Jasamc

      Flagged for being a repeatedly banned troll, for going off topic, for being wrong…oh, hell for just being him.

      • JoeBritton

        Was that topic lightbulbs? I just can’t wait for the GOP nominee for president to give his acceptance speech on, lightbulbs, at the convention. Damned Democrats screwing up our lightbulbs.

  • Anonymous

    “GOP Votes To Defund EPA On Light Bulb Enforcement”.

    Damn those last four words!

    Without them this would have been a real story.

  • Wesleyj7

    You can always find other ways to express your “Freedom” by wasting energy in other ways.

    You can leave the lights on all the time, leave the windows open and heat turned way up, and don’t forget, by buying the biggest ass SUV you can with a V-8. Vrooom vroom! Aint it good being free?

    God bless America!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_53YAPDXSTIGEDINDXF46CAB7ZY voted against carter

    Please post this around the net.

    YOU NEED TO START BUYING INCANDESCENT LIGHT BULBS IN BULK NOW! 

    THEY WILL BE ILLEGAL IN 2012. STOCK UP NOW! 

    Get as many as you think will need to last the rest of your life. 

    Do the math based on how long the bulb will burn x approx. life expectancy. 

    10 years = 100- 60 watts.
    (6-bulbs a year-2000 hrs life) $3.00 for 6 pack

    10 years = 50- 3 way 50/75/100 
    (5 bulbs a year-1750 hrs life) $1.79 for 1 pack

    10 years = 110- 75 watts
    (11-bulbs a year-750 hrs life) $3.59 for 4 pack

    Cost approx.$300.00 +$ 89.50 + 383.90 =$775.00

    This is based on Sylvania light bulbs at 2008 prices.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_53YAPDXSTIGEDINDXF46CAB7ZY voted against carter

    Please post this around the net.

    YOU NEED TO START BUYING INCANDESCENT LIGHT BULBS IN BULK NOW! 

    THEY WILL BE ILLEGAL IN 2012. STOCK UP NOW! 

    Get as many as you think will need to last the rest of your life. 

    Do the math based on how long the bulb will burn x approx. life expectancy. 

    10 years = 100- 60 watts.
    (6-bulbs a year-2000 hrs life) $3.00 for 6 pack

    10 years = 50- 3 way 50/75/100 
    (5 bulbs a year-1750 hrs life) $1.79 for 1 pack

    10 years = 110- 75 watts
    (11-bulbs a year-750 hrs life) $3.59 for 4 pack

    Cost approx.$300.00 +$ 89.50 + 383.90 =$775.00

    This is based on Sylvania light bulbs at 2008 prices.

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info