Ohio Gov. John Kasich Tells Obama To Do His Own Job First

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com

Premium Left blogad

Left Blog Ad

Permalinks

Ohio Gov. John Kasich Tells Obama To Do His Own Job First

Written By : William Teach

Of course, Obama is way too busy enjoying the trappings of the Oval Office, putting his 2012 election campaign into high gear, and getting revenge on reporters who actually report to actually do the job of Chief Executive. Obama was recently in Ohio to do a taped interview with WKYC Cleveland, and said, vis a vis SB5, which “removed sick time, pension benefits and healthcare from negotiations between unions and the government” that “this was blaming public workers for the public problems.”

Kasich was asked about the president’s strong opinion. And Kasich offered his own strong response. The full answer is on the video below, but Kasich said in the 1990s he had been House Budget Committee chairman and chief architect of the last federal budget to be balanced.

He noted that Ohioans’ elected representatives had reached this legislative agreement and, as required by law, balanced the state budget while preserving tax cuts. Then, he added:

“The president of the United States has I think a $13 trillion debt. Why doesn’t he do his job? When he does his job and gets our budget balanced and starts to prepare a future for our children, then maybe he can have an opinion on what’s going on in Ohio.”

Andrew Malcolm also has the latest from RNC Chair Reince Priebus, who said

“We’re borrowing four and a half billion dollars a day and this president is more worried about birth certificates, Oprah Winfrey and fundraisers at the Waldorf Astoria,” Priebus complained on “CNN Newsroom” Thursday, a day after the president released his long-form Hawaii birth certificate and then jetted to Chicago for a long-scheduled interview with the daytime queen of talk.

“It’s maddening and I just wish the president would engage in the real issues that are affecting America,” Priebus, who recently replaced Michael Steel, said. “We’ve got him going to Jonas Brothers, golfing, doing everything except figuring out a way to save Medicare that’s going to go bankrupt in nine years,” he added.

The problem here is that asking Obama to work is a double edged sword, because when he does actually Do President, things get much, much, much worse. His policies bear no likeness to reality, except in the 1950′s Soviet Union. Of course, what Kasich and Priebus are doing is highlighting Obama’s inability to do the job as President, which should be apparent to everyone who has cognitive abilities.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach.

-1

Anonymous

” chief architect of the last federal budget to be balanced”

What BS. Clinton anybody?

TheDarkKnight

Hey douche-bag… perhaps you need to pick up a book a read it sometime, eh?

The House of Representatives is responsible for providing and initially passing the budget. The President is merely offering up his suggested priorities which can be respected or ignored.

Since we all know you are unlikely to trust any source but a governmental source here is a link to your boy Obama’s ‘White House” website.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/our-government/legislative-branch

Paragraph four:

“The House has several powers assigned exclusively to it, including the power to initiate revenue bills, impeach federal officials, and elect the President in the case of an electoral college tie.”

I know there are some big words in there like ‘exclusively’ and ‘initiate’ so please, feel free, ask if you need help understanding this complex document.

Anonymous

Explain how that same GOP Congress which had brought the budget close to balance under Clinton did a 180 and drove the budget back into the red ink sewer under George W Bush. The only logical answer per your theory is that the GOP controlled Congress under George W Bush lost its way.

Anonymous

Easy. It wasn’t the same GOP Congress. R party was taken over by progressive Rs that bore no likeness to the Reagan philosophies and got drunk on power and all the benefits of being Washington DC power brokers. It is the ultimate argument for limited government. Restrict the power of the government so the elected officials can’t use the US economy to make or break business and ideas.

BTW, the democrat Congress led in 2006 and increased deficit spending dramatically. Do you have a problem with that? Or is that OK because well, you know, their Democrats.

If you support deficit spending by Democrats, than why do you condemn it under Republicans?
Anonymous

Easy. It wasn’t the same GOP Congress. R party was taken over by progressive Rs that bore no likeness to the Reagan philosophies and got drunk on power and all the benefits of being Washington DC power brokers. It is the ultimate argument for limited government. Restrict the power of the government so the elected officials can’t use the US economy to make or break business and ideas.

BTW, the democrat Congress led in 2006 and increased deficit spending dramatically. Do you have a problem with that? Or is that OK because well, you know, their Democrats.

If you support deficit spending by Democrats, than why do you condemn it under Republicans?

Anonymous

I’ve never been a big fan of deficit spending (especially the way that modern day Republicans and Democrats throw so much of it down the sewer on annual expenditures which add no long term value).

Deficit spending should be used for capital projects only. Like when business borrows to build a new factory or when a wage earner borrows to build a new home. All other annual expenses should be covered by annual income (taxes in the case of government).

Anonymous

Easy. It wasn’t the same GOP Congress. R party was taken over by progressive Rs that bore no likeness to the Reagan philosophies and got drunk on power and all the benefits of being Washington DC power brokers. It is the ultimate argument for limited government. Restrict the power of the government so the elected officials can’t use the US economy to make or break business and ideas.

BTW, the democrat Congress led in 2006 and increased deficit spending dramatically. Do you have a problem with that? Or is that OK because well, you know, their Democrats.

If you support deficit spending by Democrats, than why do you condemn it under Republicans?
Anonymous

Well duh, that is what happens with you let non fiscal conservatives dictate policy.
Anonymous

Well duh, that is what happens with you let non fiscal conservatives dictate policy.

http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

Ah, so here is Kasich blaming Obama for the budget mess, and here you are explaining it’s the job of Congress to do that.

Which party controls Congress again?

StanW

It’s a 50-50 split, Vega. But you already know this.

Funny how “Which party controls Congress” was never important to you when discussing Obama’s first two years!
StanW

It’s a 50-50 split, Vega. But you already know this.

Funny how “Which party controls Congress” was never important to you when discussing Obama’s first two years!

Anonymous

Or when Bush was in office.
Anonymous

Or when Bush was in office.

StanW

It’s a 50-50 split, Vega. But you already know this.

Funny how “Which party controls Congress” was never important to you when discussing Obama’s first two years!
Anonymous

Nobody, which is why we got a budget full of phony cuts that will cost just as much.

Easy solution: get rid of the rest of the Democrats and we might be able to save the country.

http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

Why not get rid of all them, and just let every congressman/woman vote according to their constituents’ wishes?
http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

Why not get rid of all them, and just let every congressman/woman vote according to their constituents’ wishes?
StanW

That is what they are supposed to be doing NOW, Vega. They are supposed to represent the wishes of the people that voted them into office. But most of them, on both sides of the aisle, are more interested in protecting their careers as politicians and enriching themselves at our expense.
TheDarkKnight

Um.. because that’s what they are supposed to do?
TheDarkKnight

Um.. because that’s what they are supposed to do?
TheDarkKnight

Um.. because that’s what they are supposed to do?

Anonymous

The Senate is controlled by the Democrats, the House is controlled by the GOP.

And Obama’s brilliant manuvering has us running a $1.6 trillion deficit this year.

http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

And Reid has called for a vote on the Republican plan.
Anonymous

And Mitch has called for a vote on Obama’s plan. What is your problem again?

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/04/29/mitch-mcconnell-doubles-down-on-harry-reid/
Anonymous

And Mitch has called for a vote on Obama’s plan. What is your problem again?

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/04/29/mitch-mcconnell-doubles-down-on-harry-reid/
Anonymous

And Mitch has called for a vote on Obama’s plan. What is your problem again?

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/04/29/mitch-mcconnell-doubles-down-on-harry-reid/

Anonymous

Which party controls Congress again?

Neither. Go check.

Republicans are trying to get a lot accomplished but dems are being obstructionist and just opposing everything put before them.

http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

So once again Republicans take no personal responsibility.
StanW

A few days ago, you told us all that Obama could not close Gitmo as he promised to do because the minority Republicans in Congress stopped him.

Don’t lecture us on taking personal responsibility, Vega.
StanW

A few days ago, you told us all that Obama could not close Gitmo as he promised to do because the minority Republicans in Congress stopped him.

Don’t lecture us on taking personal responsibility, Vega.
Anonymous

For math?

No I guess republicans don’t take responsibility for altering the fundamental laws of the universe to suit your arguments. Sorry.
Anonymous

A few days ago, you told us all that Obama could not close Gitmo as he promised to do because the minority Republicans in Congress stopped him.

Well it’s not like the laws and mathematics are constant or anything.

They change based on what argument D is trying to make.

A republican minority can run the government one day then be powerles the next.
Anonymous

A few days ago, you told us all that Obama could not close Gitmo as he promised to do because the minority Republicans in Congress stopped him.

Well it’s not like the laws and mathematics are constant or anything.

They change based on what argument D is trying to make.

A republican minority can run the government one day then be powerles the next.
http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

A republican minority can run the government one day then be powerles the next.

I never said anything about a Republican minority. I said CONGRESS prevented it.

Please don’t refer to me and cite someone lying about what I said.
StanW

That is exactly what you said, Vega, That the REPUBLICANS in Congress stopped it.

Stop whining when you own words are used against you, you pissy little BITCH!
Anonymous

How is the Republican Party responsible for the Democratic Party blocking all of their beneficial bills in the Senate?
Anonymous

How is the Republican Party responsible for the Democratic Party blocking all of their beneficial bills in the Senate?
Anonymous

How is the Republican Party responsible for the Democratic Party blocking all of their beneficial bills in the Senate?
Anonymous

How is the Republican Party responsible for the Democratic Party blocking all of their beneficial bills in the Senate?
Anonymous

How is the Republican Party responsible for the Democratic Party blocking all of their beneficial bills in the Senate?
Anonymous

So is it your contention that Republicans control Congress or that they do not but are somehow to blame for everything that happens anyway?
Anonymous

So is it your contention that Republicans control Congress or that they do not but are somehow to blame for everything that happens anyway?
Anonymous

So is it your contention that Republicans control Congress or that they do not but are somehow to blame for everything that happens anyway?
Anonymous

So is it your contention that Republicans control Congress or that they do not but are somehow to blame for everything that happens anyway?
Anonymous

So is it your contention that Republicans control Congress or that they do not but are somehow to blame for everything that happens anyway?
Anonymous

So is it your contention that Republicans control Congress or that they do not but are somehow to blame for everything that happens anyway?
Anonymous

So is it your contention that Republicans control Congress or that they do not but are somehow to blame for everything that happens anyway?
Anonymous

So is it your contention that Republicans control Congress or that they do not but are somehow to blame for everything that happens anyway?
Anonymous

Consider: Democrats are to blame for all that happened when Bush was in the whitehouse and republicans controlled the Congress.

Does disagreeing with that mean you don’t think democrats should take responsibility for their own actions?
Anonymous

Consider: Democrats are to blame for all that happened when Bush was in the whitehouse and republicans controlled the Congress.

Does disagreeing with that mean you don’t think democrats should take responsibility for their own actions?
TheDarkKnight

I’m sure Republicans would be more willing to take responsibility for their actions as soon as Democrats take responsibility for their part in the latest economic collapse.

You will, of course, deny this and blame Bush.
TheDarkKnight

I’m sure Republicans would be more willing to take responsibility for their actions as soon as Democrats take responsibility for their part in the latest economic collapse.

You will, of course, deny this and blame Bush.
TheDarkKnight

I’m sure Republicans would be more willing to take responsibility for their actions as soon as Democrats take responsibility for their part in the latest economic collapse.

You will, of course, deny this and blame Bush.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Given that they didn’t push or vote for the “stimulus” package or Government Health Insurance Takeover acts, not to mention dozens of other little programs the Democrats rammed through and Obama signed… they don’t bear any responsibility.
http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

So once again Republicans take no personal responsibility.
http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

So once again Republicans take no personal responsibility.
http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

So once again Republicans take no personal responsibility.
http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

So once again Republicans take no personal responsibility.
http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

So once again Republicans take no personal responsibility.
http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

So once again Republicans take no personal responsibility.
http://www.vega.com Vega – The Smart, Sexy Liberal

So once again Republicans take no personal responsibility.

Anonymous

Which party controls Congress again?

Neither. Go check.

Republicans are trying to get a lot accomplished but dems are being obstructionist and just opposing everything put before them.
Anonymous

1/2 is 50% Vega. Nixon sees math isn’t your strong suit.

Senate : Democratic Control
House: GOP Control.

TheDarkKnight

You forget, Nixon, that the Republicans were ‘obstructionists’ when the Democrats had filibuster proof majorities in both houses of Congress.

Now that they control 1/2 of 1/3 of the Federal government they are obstructionists.
TheDarkKnight

You forget, Nixon, that the Republicans were ‘obstructionists’ when the Democrats had filibuster proof majorities in both houses of Congress.

Now that they control 1/2 of 1/3 of the Federal government they are obstructionists.
TheDarkKnight

You forget, Nixon, that the Republicans were ‘obstructionists’ when the Democrats had filibuster proof majorities in both houses of Congress.

Now that they control 1/2 of 1/3 of the Federal government they are obstructionists.

Anonymous

1/2 is 50% Vega. Nixon sees math isn’t your strong suit.

Senate : Democratic Control
House: GOP Control.
Anonymous

1/2 is 50% Vega. Nixon sees math isn’t your strong suit.

Senate : Democratic Control
House: GOP Control.
Anonymous

1/2 is 50% Vega. Nixon sees math isn’t your strong suit.

Senate : Democratic Control
House: GOP Control.
Anonymous

1/2 is 50% Vega. Nixon sees math isn’t your strong suit.

Senate : Democratic Control
House: GOP Control.
Anonymous

The DEMOCRATS were in control of both the House and the Senate for much of the last almost six years, and it was during the “unbeatable” control of the last two when most of the worst legislation was passed. (Speaking of politicians with a “WE WON” attitude.)
The GOP has only been in control of the House for the last FOUR MONTHS! They have a plan for a budget and have passed one, and the only thing the Obamessiah can do is ridicule them.
Anonymous

The DEMOCRATS were in control of both the House and the Senate for much of the last almost six years, and it was during the “unbeatable” control of the last two when most of the worst legislation was passed. (Speaking of politicians with a “WE WON” attitude.)
The GOP has only been in control of the House for the last FOUR MONTHS! They have a plan for a budget and have passed one, and the only thing the Obamessiah can do is ridicule them.
Anonymous

The DEMOCRATS were in control of both the House and the Senate for much of the last almost six years, and it was during the “unbeatable” control of the last two when most of the worst legislation was passed. (Speaking of politicians with a “WE WON” attitude.)
The GOP has only been in control of the House for the last FOUR MONTHS! They have a plan for a budget and have passed one, and the only thing the Obamessiah can do is ridicule them.
TheDarkKnight

Your ignorance and partisanship is really growing old Vega. You do understand that Congress has the sole authority to initiate legislation right? And, as such, any budgetary legislation must therefore originate in Congress? And, aside from offering priorities to Congress the President has few, if any, Constitutional responsibilities when it comes to the federal budget?

Yet you try and spin (spin pinwheel, spin) the indisputable facts into some sort of ‘us vs. them’ diatribe.

Point of fact, while GWB did not veto enough (for my liking anyway) of the spending bills originated while he was President the Democrat party controlled Congress during his last two years. Many of the same Democrats who help Obama put the “pedal to the metal” during the last two years. You do remember that, right?

I am certainly no fan of GWB but you are willfully ignorant of the facts which is why I grow tired of trying to hold a rational discussion with you.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

You’re right, it wasn’t Obama alone; he had a lot of help from the Democrats in congress.

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

More tripe, no reality.

Anonymous

Ohio SB5 isn’t getting the airtime of the Wisconsin fight, but it’s actually done a lot to damage Kasich here. The bill is a big overreach into things like government emergency powers and imposing rules on local governments. He was a plurality governor (49%) and his approval has dropped to 30% already. There’s also an effort underway to repeal SB5 via popular vote in November, and there’s a very good chance it will succeed.

If Kasich uses his emergency provisions to cancel union contracts while the bill is in effect, it could very well trigger a general public strike and cause chaos in the state. Ohio should be a cautionary tale to Republicans about getting “we won” syndrome, and that our leaders still need to respect the process and the people. Even if you’re a cynical Republican outside the state you have to acknowledge that a 30% GOP governor in Ohio would not be a good thing to have going into the Presidential race.
Anonymous

Ohio SB5 isn’t getting the airtime of the Wisconsin fight, but it’s actually done a lot to damage Kasich here. The bill is a big overreach into things like government emergency powers and imposing rules on local governments. He was a plurality governor (49%) and his approval has dropped to 30% already. There’s also an effort underway to repeal SB5 via popular vote in November, and there’s a very good chance it will succeed.

If Kasich uses his emergency provisions to cancel union contracts while the bill is in effect, it could very well trigger a general public strike and cause chaos in the state. Ohio should be a cautionary tale to Republicans about getting “we won” syndrome, and that our leaders still need to respect the process and the people. Even if you’re a cynical Republican outside the state you have to acknowledge that a 30% GOP governor in Ohio would not be a good thing to have going into the Presidential race.
Anonymous

Hehe, well said. This won’t go over well with our trolls/media. But he’s dead on.
Pingback: Fastest Production Car – Facts About the Fastest Car in the World
Anonymous

Anyone looking to Kasich for leadership just doesn’t where he is shopping. This is a low tier politician who left Washington because he was so outclassed. Son of a factory worker out there carrying water for the wealthy. Traitor in the family. Ohioans, wake up.

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

More tripe, no reality.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

More tripe, no reality.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

More tripe, no reality.
https://me.yahoo.com/a/NZ1JVjE4toGKNnrUu1rpAIUadz_ZXWlGcJI.UhDcO35x03w-#37966 Haironfire

Actually, I have read quite a bit on Gov. Kasich. He is really a great and admirable individual.
BTW, what is your problem with the wealthy? Do you not ever want to be wealthy? Do you want to be grindingly poor your whole life?
I am curious if Kasich is even your Governor.I am also curious as to why 85% of your posts are flagged and banned.

TheDarkKnight

Doesn’t matter Haironfire… the last refuge of a Democrat scoundrel is to throw out personal attacks…

It takes 50 pages of facts to refute 1 paragraph of lies – something they know well and, frankly, count on.

As for his flag/ban record.. I think his ignorance speaks for itself.

StanW

I disagree with one thing you said, Sir Knight. In some cases, it may take “50 pages of facts to refute 1 paragraph of lies“, but since obama has been on the scene and Liberals think they own the world, their lies are made up of easily refuted talking points and previously failed lies.

And for the trolls like Joe and Vega, their lies and their hypocrisy are VERY easily refuted just by pointing out how mind-numbingly STUPID they are.

TheDarkKnight

Doesn’t matter Haironfire… the last refuge of a Democrat scoundrel is to throw out personal attacks…

It takes 50 pages of facts to refute 1 paragraph of lies – something they know well and, frankly, count on.

As for his flag/ban record.. I think his ignorance speaks for itself.
TheDarkKnight

Doesn’t matter Haironfire… the last refuge of a Democrat scoundrel is to throw out personal attacks…

It takes 50 pages of facts to refute 1 paragraph of lies – something they know well and, frankly, count on.

As for his flag/ban record.. I think his ignorance speaks for itself.
TheDarkKnight

Doesn’t matter Haironfire… the last refuge of a Democrat scoundrel is to throw out personal attacks…

It takes 50 pages of facts to refute 1 paragraph of lies – something they know well and, frankly, count on.

As for his flag/ban record.. I think his ignorance speaks for itself.
Anonymous

“flagged and banned” Too effective and relevant.

Problem with the wealthy? Do you mean our vast wealth inequality and the greed which promotes it?
Anonymous

“flagged and banned” Too effective and relevant.

Problem with the wealthy? Do you mean our vast wealth inequality and the greed which promotes it?
Anonymous

SlowJoe is a ‘below the median’ intellectual who is grindingly poor by choice. He is a net zero contributor and comes up with any excuse possible to not work. He lives in abject misery and blames all of his problems on the evil rich.

He’s a flag on sight troll who cuts and pastes talking points or simply plagiarizes leftist talking heads. Instead of staking his claim on the American Dream, he’d rather bring everyone down to his level of misery. He is a rabid anti semite and islamist apologist, a virulent communist who denies it even as he spouts marxist agitprop. Basically he doesn’t have a single, solitary original thought in his head and is so brainwashed you can’t even attempt to carry on a conversation with him…

https://me.yahoo.com/a/NZ1JVjE4toGKNnrUu1rpAIUadz_ZXWlGcJI.UhDcO35x03w-#37966 Haironfire

Actually, I have read quite a bit on Gov. Kasich. He is really a great and admirable individual.
BTW, what is your problem with the wealthy? Do you not ever want to be wealthy? Do you want to be grindingly poor your whole life?
I am curious if Kasich is even your Governor.I am also curious as to why 85% of your posts are flagged and banned.
Anonymous

So you support forcing people to pay union dues that go to support politicans that may not share the same values as these workers. A would think a son of a factory worker would want to preserve the rights of the workers, nto th erights of their unions boseses.
Anonymous

So you support forcing people to pay union dues that go to support politicans that may not share the same values as these workers. A would think a son of a factory worker would want to preserve the rights of the workers, nto th erights of their unions boseses.

Anonymous

Yes I support the idea that workers who are unionized and making a decent wage should pay dues to the source of that decency. And yes, if some of those dues are spent on political campaigns that help to maintain unionization and its benefits, I agree wholeheartedly.

If union workers don’t like the idea, they can quit their jobs and go to work for nonunionized companies or corporations. It’s that simple. There are over 150 federal laws that support the legality of unions. If you don’t like it, move to Sweden.

Anonymous

Sorry, I meant move to Bangladesh. No unions there.
Anonymous

Sorry, I meant move to Bangladesh. No unions there.
Anonymous

Sorry, I meant move to Bangladesh. No unions there.
Anonymous

Sorry, I meant move to Bangladesh. No unions there.

Anonymous

Yes I support the idea that workers who are unionized and making a decent wage should pay dues to the source of that decency. And yes, if some of those dues are spent on political campaigns that help to maintain unionization and its benefits, I agree wholeheartedly.

If union workers don’t like the idea, they can quit their jobs and go to work for nonunionized companies or corporations. It’s that simple. There are over 150 federal laws that support the legality of unions. If you don’t like it, move to Sweden.
Anonymous

Yes I support the idea that workers who are unionized and making a decent wage should pay dues to the source of that decency. And yes, if some of those dues are spent on political campaigns that help to maintain unionization and its benefits, I agree wholeheartedly.

If union workers don’t like the idea, they can quit their jobs and go to work for nonunionized companies or corporations. It’s that simple. There are over 150 federal laws that support the legality of unions. If you don’t like it, move to Sweden.
Anonymous

Yes I support the idea that workers who are unionized and making a decent wage should pay dues to the source of that decency. And yes, if some of those dues are spent on political campaigns that help to maintain unionization and its benefits, I agree wholeheartedly.

If union workers don’t like the idea, they can quit their jobs and go to work for nonunionized companies or corporations. It’s that simple. There are over 150 federal laws that support the legality of unions. If you don’t like it, move to Sweden.

Anonymous

So you support forcing people to pay union dues that go to support politicans that may not share the same values as these workers. A would think a son of a factory worker would want to preserve the rights of the workers, nto th erights of their unions boseses.
Anonymous

So you support forcing people to pay union dues that go to support politicans that may not share the same values as these workers. A would think a son of a factory worker would want to preserve the rights of the workers, nto th erights of their unions boseses.
Anonymous

So you support forcing people to pay union dues that go to support politicans that may not share the same values as these workers. A would think a son of a factory worker would want to preserve the rights of the workers, nto th erights of their unions boseses.

Anonymous

Anyone looking to Kasich for leadership just doesn’t where he is shopping. This is a low tier politician who left Washington because he was so outclassed. Son of a factory worker out there carrying water for the wealthy. Traitor in the family. Ohioans, wake up.
Anonymous

Anyone looking to Kasich for leadership just doesn’t where he is shopping. This is a low tier politician who left Washington because he was so outclassed. Son of a factory worker out there carrying water for the wealthy. Traitor in the family. Ohioans, wake up.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Its interesting where and when President Obama uses the bully pulpit of the presidency. he won’t use it constructively or to help, he doesn’t call for good or liberty or to condemn evil. He uses it to attack people who dare disagree with him politically and support his allies in the unions and academia.

That shows what his priorities are.
Anonymous

Okay folks let’s back up a bit. Kasich is no genius, has a probably average mind, and no leadership qualities at all. When he served in the Congress, it was evident everytime he opened his mouth that there was less there than meets the eye.

That he took it upon himself to criticize the president suggest to me that he now has presidential ambitions. For that reason alone, I encourage him to criticize more and get his iron in the fire. Compared to the rest of the aspirants, he’s more than average, and would likely stand tall in a debate to Trump. But that is what I would like to see: two also rans gunning for each other.

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

Premium Right Ads

Blogads Right

Previous Features

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”

Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth

Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers

The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation

The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans

Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders

User Info

Features

Archives Best of RWN Humor John Hawkins Interviews Quotes Special to RWN