2016: A Repeat of the 1960s

One thing is abundantly clear: Neither political party will emerge from the 2016 nomination battle looking anything like they did when they began the marathon. Fundamental changes are now inevitable in both political parties. And they will be irreversible.

Dick Morris 3

These changes will not be so much in how the ethnic or geographic constituencies divide themselves between the parties as in the policies, programs and priorities of each party.

Whether Donald Trump or Ted Cruz win, the Republican Party will not be the same. The party of Jeb Bush, John Kasich, Chris Christie, John Boehner and Mitch McConnell has been vanquished.

Even if Bernie Sanders loses to Hillary Clinton, his ability to galvanize a new movement and to win young people — of all races — in the Northeast and Midwest presages a new Democratic Party.

To understand what is happening, look back to the ’60s.

Before Barry Goldwater won the nomination in 1964, the Republican Party was but a paler imitation of the liberal Democrats. Largely centered in New York and the northeast, it was Republican governor Nelson Rockefeller who first legalized abortion and Republican jurist, Harry Blackmun, who wrote the majority opinion in Roe v. Wade.

But 1964 changed the GOP irrevocably. Its power base shifted to the Sunbelt and its dominant constituency became small-business and religious voters. The party of Thomas Dewey and Rockefeller died in 1964.

Before 1968, the Democratic Party was more hawkish than the GOP. Its largely internationalist positioning was in contrast to the isolationism of Republicans. It opposed civil rights and catered to its southern base. But it embraced fiscal orthodoxy and rejected social change.

After 1968, it became the anti-war party and embraced civil rights, feminism, environmentalism, gay rights, rights for the disabled and a host of social causes.

2016 will be a year of changes of similar magnitude in each party.

The Democrats will jolt permanently to the left. Socialized medicine, much higher taxes on the wealthy, opposition to fracking, a fanatical fight against climate change, harsh anti-Wall Street measures and ever more radical social change will be its hallmarks. Prison reform and a fundamental change in the criminal justice system will move to center stage. These changes will leave the likes of the Clintons and even President Obama far behind.

The Republicans will harden their anti-immigration position, will turn away from their historic commitment to free trade, will join the Democratic left in regulating Wall Street and cracking down on the Federal Reserve. They will embrace privacy policies and impose them on the NSA and the intelligence community. The Bushes and Mitt Romney will be left far behind.

We cannot even begin to predict where these changes will lead, anymore than we could have known that gay rights would rise in the Democratic agenda or abortion opposition in the Republican. Neither issue was on the radar in the ’60s.

These changes, in each party, reflect massive outrage at the irrelevance of our government and its politics. In the ’60s, the gap between Eisenhower’s Republicans and Kennedy’s Democrats was minuscule. The Goldwater and McCarthy-McGovern-RFK candidacies drove the parties further apart. Real choices emerged. Fundamental assumptions became debatable. A genuine left and right came to be.

So, now we are going to widen the ideological divide still further. The Donald Trump/Ted Cruz Republicans will clash with the increasingly Bernie Sanders-esque Democrats, and more topics and fundamental questions will come into play.

Democracy will no longer be about minor differences on how to cut the deficit or incremental approaches to waging war abroad. Huge fissures will open and everything will be in play. The people will have taken back their parties and insisted that they become vehicles for big changes in a system that all agree is failing.

Also see,

Surging Crus in Ohio, Illinois and Wyoming

Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!