Term “Start a Family” Denounced as “Loathsome”

A primary objective of progressive social engineering is the destruction of the family. In the past, they have attacked the family indirectly, e.g., by undermining the sanctity of marriage. But now they are getting explicit.

What liberals would eliminate completely, they label as offensive. Per Bill O’Sullivan, Senior Managing Editor of the Washingtonian, that now includes the term “start a family”:

Loathsome words aren’t just clichés, jargon, and grammar lapses. They’re also seemingly benign expressions that spill easily from our mouths and fingertips yet have implications we don’t even think about—until we do.

One of the worst of them: “start a family.”

Trending: The 15 Best Conservative News Sites On The Internet

What this euphemism means is get pregnant—or try to get pregnant, or have a baby, or adopt. So say that. Start a family devalues any couple who doesn’t happen to have kids, for whatever reason. It even sells single people short, who may not have children but do have “chosen” families of friends…

Note the attempt to define family out of existence by pretending that having friends is the same thing as raising children.

Attacking the term “start a family” also advances other agenda items: normalizing sexual perversion and discouraging regular Americans from reproducing. But destroying the family unit appears to be the ultimate objective.

“Family values” has been a derogatory term among liberals for some time. Now “start a family” is derogatory. When utopia has been imposed, we won’t need any family, because the government will provide all the social cohesion we need.

child free time magazine
The push continues.

On tips from Steve A and Torcer. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!