Why raise taxes when Sacramento squanders our money? This is a logical and fair question posed recently in an editorial by long-serving Sacramento Bee statehouse reporter Dan Walters.Walters mentions a number of the most recent “boondoggles” on the California taxpayer by their statehouse.: Read it all. However, one of the biggest, most corrupt scams in the state is getting very little attention by the state’s two largest newspaper/fishwrappers.
State Controller John Chiang says the State Corrections department, which runs the jails, has mismanaged [maybe stolen??We need a grand jury on this]at least $31 million dollars.
Why isn’t this latest report on $31 million of waste and fraud in the State Corrections Office budget being reported?Will it interfere with Sacramento Democrats’ plan to raise taxes?
Pelican Bay --- hellhole prison run by state corrections scene of hunger strike
So now we learn, in additon to being a bunch of incompetent idiots who can’t see a parole violation if it hits them on the head, and can’t manage the jail populations despite years to do so, the California Corrections and Rehabilitation Department has “lost” $31 million. Heads should roll. Entire divisions of this useless, corrupt agency should be shut down. Better yet, screw them. Let’s have private prisons. They REALLY hate it when that gets mentioned!
“Chiang says that he noticed internal control deficiencies that put the state at risk of fraud and abuse. As of June 30, 2010, the bank reconciliation of the CDCR’s major account showed $27 million in unresolved funds on the bank balance. However, internal CDCR records show $31 million in unresolved funds. Chiang argues that anyone with access to CDCR funds could fraudulently issue checks with little chance of being detected. In addition, although state accounting procedures require two authorized signatures for payments of more than $15,000, the Controller’s review found two separate checks exceeding that amount without dual signatures.
Chiang has made 36 recommendations to CDCR fix the problems discovered. Chiang’s auditors will revisit CDCR in 12 months to assess the agencies progress in implementing changes.
The prison system accounts for more than 11 percent of California’s general fund spending.”
“Our audit found serious internal control deficiencies over the department’s system of internal controls and procedures for processingORF transactions. These deficiencies could lead to waste, fraud, andmisappropriation of funds. Specifically, we identified the followingconcerns:
–
Inadequate collection efforts resulted in delayed collection of millionsof dollars in receivables from employee salary and travel advances.
–
The department has serious internal control deficiencies relate to ORFtransactions that could lead to fraud, abuse, and misappropriation of funds.
–
Invalid receivables related to salary advances and travel advanceswere not adjusted in a timely manner.
–
The department does not have sufficient written policies andprocedures for using the ORF.
–
Discharges from accountability were not filed, and discharges weremade internally without proper authority.
–
The department used the ORF to pay for other program expenses.The severity of internal control deficiencies identified in this audit raises concerns about the adequacy of administrative and internal accounting.”
According to this press release, Chiang’s auditors reviewed CDCR records from July 1, 2009 through July 31, 2010. They found the department had more than $6 million in outstanding receivables related to salary and travel advances, with more than $4 million of that outstanding for more than two months and $465,000 carried on the books for more than three years.
Martin Hoshino, CDCR Undersecretary for Administration and Offender Services, didn’t dispute the audit. The department has implemented 22 of the 36 recommendations made by the controller, he said in the controller’s release, and has now “prioritized the vigorous collection of outstanding debts.”
The total outstanding balance has shrunk by $2.2 million since November 1, 2010, he said, and “we will continue in our efforts until we have surmounted the issues identified in this audit.”
One CDCR employee who was terminated last year received a lump sum check for $14,950 from a CDCR revolving fund to meet the deadline for cashing out employees when they exit state service. Then CDCR paid the employee full salary and another $14,950. “Six months later, there still was no effort to recoup the overpayment of $14,950,” the controller’s office said.
In a 2008 case, a CDCR employee received an advance of more than $8,000. Nearly three years later, the advance still hadn’t been collected. The employee still works for the department.