Obama is Looking to Ban Social Security Recipients From Owning Guns

20 Jul, 2015 by Cassy Fiano

Print this article Font size -16+

The liberal assault on the second amendment is continuing, thanks to a new proposal from the Obama administration. Obama’s newest idea is to keep some Social Security recipients from owning guns.

The Obama administration wants to keep people collecting Social Security benefits from owning guns if it is determined they are unable to manage their own affairs, the Los Angeles Times reported.

The push, which could potentially affect millions whose monthly disability payments are handled by others, is intended to bring the Social Security Administration in line with laws that prevent gun sales to felons, drug addicts, immigrants in the United States illegally, and others, according to the paper.

The language of federal gun laws restricts ownership to people who are unable to manage their own affairs due to “marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease” – which could potentially affect a large group within Social Security, the LA Times reported.

If Social Security, which has never taken part in the background check system, uses the same standard as the Department of Veterans Affairs – which is the idea floated – then millions of beneficiaries could be affected, with about 4.2 million adults receiving monthly benefits that are managed by “representative payees.”

The latest move is part of the efforts by President Obama to strengthen gun control following the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in 2012.

Critics are blasting the plan, saying that expanding the list of people who cannot own guns based on financial competence is wrongheaded.

The ban, they argue, would keep guns out of the hands of some dangerous people, but would also include people who simply have a bad memory or have a hard time balancing a checkbook.

Who cares about the Constitution when there’s an agenda to be pushed? In the meantime, Americans apparently need to make sure that they keep their finances perfectly in check, if that’s going to be the barometer from now on for whether or not we’re entitled to our rights as enshrined in the Constitution.