TV Co-Host Posts Epic Rant On Twitter, What She Said Could DESTROY Hillary [VIDEO]

07 Jul, 2016 by Greg Campbell

Print this article Font size -16+

National security is no joke. When granted high access, one should view that as an awesome responsibility – not a right. Hillary Clinton felt that she was above the law – and it turns out that she was right. One former White House staffer-turned-journalist, Dana Perino, beautifully outlined why Hillary’s crime was so unforgivable. Check it out.

From Independent Journal:

Dana Perino currently co-hosts “The Five” on Fox News, but prior to that, she was the White House Press Secretary under President George W. Bush.

And as a former White House staffer with experience in the world of security clearances and classified information, she offered a unique take — or rather, takedown — of Hillary Clinton and the FBI’s final recommendation in her case.

She started with a warning:

Would you allow me a bit of a rant on the Comey/HRC email story? Because I’m stewing. So here goes…

— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) July 6, 2016

And addressed the fact that security clearances are a privilege, not a right:

When I was privileged to be granted SCI/top secret security clearance, I took it seriously. What an honor to be trusted with such info

— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) July 6, 2016

And said sometimes security requires sacrifice:

I remember when we went to Russia, we had to leave our Blackberries on AF1. We were nervous – how would we communicate? But we did it.

— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) July 6, 2016

Because the nation’s safety comes first:

Because the USSS asked us to do so – to protect the nation’s information. This wasn’t about our emails – but the nation’s information

— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) July 6, 2016

And sometimes the sacrifice is personal:

Because when you work for the federal government and at the WH in particular, you work for THE PEOPLE. Your sense of self is erased.

— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) July 6, 2016

Because it’s not about you:

You don’t have a right to the information. Every thing you do should be for the nation’s wellbeing. So we left our devices on the plane.

— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) July 6, 2016

Then Perino started in on the FBI’s decision:

So Comey says HRC had no intent. 1) I don’t believe that. 2) Who cares? That’s not what the law says. At a minimum, I’d lose my clearance

— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) July 6, 2016

And whether a Republican would have received similar treatment:

But then what of this decision yesterday? Is that brave? Would the same deference & pretzel twisting of the law been done for a Republican?

— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) July 6, 2016

Perino says, “no”:

I think we all know the answer: NO. It would not. A GOP in the same circumstances would have at least lost their clearance. OK fine.

— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) July 6, 2016

But that was just the “warm-up”:

I’m flying back to be on @TheFive and @kellyfile tonight. So I’m just getting warmed up…

— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) July 6, 2016

Perino appeared on “The Kelly File” Wednesday evening to discuss the topic further, explaining to host Megyn Kelly that her uncharacteristic Twitter rant was the result of her frustration coupled with the fact that she “had wifi on the plane.”

Hillary Clinton is a traitor to this country. She knowingly violated national security to accommodate her own shady dealings. Even if we accept that she did so unintentionally (which is a preposterous narrative we should all reject), the law is clear in that intent matters not.

She placed American lives in danger and attempted to cover it up and lied about it.

The rule of law literally means nothing anymore. If a person can be excused from prison time simply because of their political connections, it makes the rest of us chumps for abiding by the law.