Judge denies Obama Amnesty Appeal, accuses Obama lawyers of misleading him

08 Apr, 2015 by Scott Hounsell

Print this article Font size -16+

Here’s something you’ve heard before:  Someone accused the Obama Administration of being misleading.  Only this time, that person was the judge hearing the Appeal case of the recently halted, mass Amnesty plan, proposed by Obama last year.

“President Obama’s new deportation amnesty will remain halted, a federal judge in Texas ruled Tuesday night in an order that also delivered a judicial spanking to the president’s lawyers for misleading the Court

Judge Andrew S. Hanen, who first halted the amnesty in February, just two days before it was to take effect, said he’s even more convinced of his decision now, particularly after Mr. Obama earlier this year said he intends for his policies to supersede federal laws.

Judge Hanen pointed to Mr. Obama’s comments at a February town hall when the president warned immigration agents to adhere to his policies or else face “consequences.”

“In summary, the chief executive has ordered that the laws requiring removal of illegal immigrants that conflict with the 2014 DHS directive are not to be enforced, and that anyone who attempts to do so will be punished,” Judge Hanen wrote.

“This is not merely ineffective enforcement. This is total non-enforcement,” the judge continued, saying that Mr. Obama’s own descriptions of how he is carrying out his policies have hurt his case.

Mr. Obama in November announced a new amnesty for illegal immigrant parents whose children are either U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents. The amnesty could apply to as many as 5 million illegal immigrants.”

We really could have used this judge on the Supreme Court when Obamacare was heard.  If President Obama had to be held accountable for every time he was misleading, I’m pretty sure his entire Presidency would be denied on appeal!