Appeasement: Muslims Want NYPD Terrorism Report Scrubbed

19 Jan, 2015 by William Teach

Print this article Font size -16+

Back in 2007, the NYPD compiled a report regarding home grown Islamist terrorists, which was the blue print for monitoring mosques and Muslim groups to attempt to stop terrorist attacks and the home grown Islamists. This made Muslims very upset that law enforcement would dare to go where Muslims are radicalized, so they sued. Now the NY Post learns

In top-secret talks to settle federal lawsuits against the NYPD for monitoring mosques, the city is weighing a demand that it scrub from its Web site a report on Islamic terrorists, The Post has learned.

The groundbreaking, 92-page report, titled “Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat,” angers critics who say it promotes “religious profiling” and discrimination against Muslims. But law-enforcement sources say removing the report now would come at the worst time — after mounting terror attacks by Islamic extremists in Paris, Boston, Sydney and Ottawa.

That is one of the main sticking points in settling the lawsuit with the Muslims.

“The harm is that it sends the message that the NYPD is going to back down on its counterterrorism effort in the name of political correctness,” said a former NYPD official. “Shame on the NYPD if they do.”

If the NYPD was doing this to Whites, Christians, and/or Conservative groups, no one would be batting an eye. However, in our PC world, certain groups must never be surveilled. What’s more disturbing than removing the report is this next bit

Also on the table are demands that the NYPD halt any ongoing surveillance in the Muslim community and that records of prior monitoring be expunged, sources said.

It’s not like a homegrown jihadi attacked NYPD officers with a hatchet last April. Sadly, Mosques and Islamic schools are some of the prime recruiting grounds around the world for Muslim radicalization. No, most will not become jihadis. They won’t engage in violence. But, if you have a profile of a suspect, you use that profile to look for the suspect. But, in today’s PC world, certain groups are off-limits.

Liberals will, of course, throw out the word “Islamophobia”. Well, yeah. Phobias are often called “irrational”. Yet, spiders can harm you. So can snakes. So can falling. Surely, not all Muslims are radicalized. Yet, where are they? So few refuse to speak up. Few get involved in things like the Paris march last week. Why? Well, one reason is that they’re afraid of being attacked by the radicals. Think on that.

(The DiploMad 2.0) Let’s look around the world, and ask “Who is not an Islamophobe?” The world is full to the rafters with Islamophobes. I wonder if the people slaughtered at Charlie Hebdo and in the kosher market had a bout of Islamophobia just before the AK rounds put an end to those thoughts? What about the people in the Westgate Mall in Nairobi or in the villages of Nigeria? Guess what? Huge numbers of Islamophobes live lives of utter misery and horror in the Islamic world. I lived for years in Muslim countries, and met countless Muslims terrified of Islam, especially women and budding intellectuals. Let us not forget that in the long and bloody history of the Religion of Peace, the greatest number, by far, of Islam’s victims have come from the ranks of Muslims. Nobody massacres Muslims as frequently and as copiously as do other Muslims following the dictates of Islam.

Liberals are more than happy to equate every action by a Christian, Jew, Conservative, White, with the group as a whole, even when the perpetrator is performing actions/saying things that are completely contradictory to the belief set of the group. Yet, in Liberal World, the same never applies when an Islamist does something while claiming it is the name of Mohammed and/or Allah.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach.