For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
The EPA’s War on Energy Producer Range Resources
Written By : Dave Blount

Even before America slit its wrists by electing him, Barack Hussein Obama gave us a preview of his energy policy by promising to use deliberately excessive regulation to bankrupt coal plants. The objective in destroying the energy sector is twofold: 1) devastate our still quasi-capitalist economy, creating enough hardship to pave the way for true socialism; and 2) pander to gullible morons in the Democrat base who actually believe that using energy makes it be too hot out for the polar bears. For the most part, this malignant agenda is carried out by what is emerging as the most pernicious and the most powerful agency in the entire federal behemoth: the EPA. Its war on Range Resources offers a typical example of how it operates:

Range Resources, fighting claims by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that it “caused or contributed” to the contamination of two Parker County, Texas, water wells, says in court filings that the EPA’s conclusions are “sheer guesswork” based on “threadbare-thin” reasoning. …

The EPA pinpointed two Range natural gas wells, drilled more than a mile deep into the Barnett Shale, as the likely sources of methane contamination in the residential water wells in far south Parker County that are approximately 200 to 220 feet deep. Methane is the chief component of natural gas.

Range said “there is 5,500 feet of the earth’s strata separating the bottom of the private water wells from the subsurface horizontal sections” of its gas wells, and that the EPA order “does not even set forth a theory how gas could migrate from Range’s wells to the aquifer.”

Range says the EPA’s order imposed costly and excessive requirements far beyond the scope required to ensure protection of the drinking-water supplies of the two contaminated wells, which served nine people.

The purpose is not to prevent the imaginary effect of the natural gas drilling on nine people’s water, but to bleed energy companies until they can’t afford to do business anymore.

David Poole, senior vice president and general counsel for Range, estimated that the company already has spent $1.5 million to $1.75 million defending itself against the EPA order.

Typically, once people start smelling a rat, the government is stonewalling…

The EPA continues to oppose Range’s request to take sworn depositions of [Chris] Lister [an "environmental engineer" who was told by an agency chemist that there was no conclusive evidence backing the EPA's charges] and another EPA official, Jerry Saunders, who were involved in the contamination investigation.

…and hedging:

While the EPA says Range “caused or contributed” to the contamination, Range repeatedly has noted that John Blevins, the EPA official who signed the order, later retreated somewhat, saying in a Jan. 25 sworn deposition that Range “may” have caused or contributed to it.

As for what really caused the well contamination:

The Texas Railroad Commission found March 29 that the Range gas wells did not contaminate the water wells. The commission agreed with staff examiners and Range consultants that the gas in the water wells likely came from the shallow Strawn geological formation, which is only a few hundred feet deep and into which some gas wells were drilled in the early 1980s.

It will get much worse before it gets better. Next year the EPA will tighten its regulatory fist around power plants and oil refineries in the name of the disintegrating global warming hoax. Maybe Sped Begley had the right idea with his bicycle-powered toaster — so long as the EPA doesn’t find out about it.

On a tip from Zappatrust. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

0
  • Anonymous

    Well, once again, we see RWN scientists out in full force, and this time it is not Teach telling us the truth about gas drilling and acquifer contamination, but a real scientist, Professor Helsing. Somehow, global warming got squeezed into the mix, but I’m sure what it has to do with anything.

    • Anonymous

      Yes, Professor Helsing thinks all the scentists that support CO2 caused global warming, or even that earth is warming are all “crackpots”. Helsing accepts the conclusions of the esteemed anti-global warming scientists such as Watts, Lord Moncton, Breitbart, Sen. Imhofe, Will, Hannity, Limbaugh, and dozens of other similar “esteemed” scientists. Professor Helsing has never commented, even when challenged by me, on the 12+ published results backing Mann’s “hockey stick”conclusion. Many of those studies used methods of obtaining proxy temperature data and analysis completely different than that of Mann’s.
      Yes there are a small number of real climate scientists that actually publish in scientific journals their results that indicate earth is warming for other reasons beside increases in CO2. Does Professor Helsing critique those results? No, they must be correct because thay fit the “conservative” view.

      • StanW

        The two of you please get a room of your own and quit slobbering all over Mr. Hawkin’s bandwidth.

      • StanW

        The two of you please get a room of your own and quit slobbering all over Mr. Hawkin’s bandwidth.

    • Anonymous

      Yes, Professor Helsing thinks all the scentists that support CO2 caused global warming, or even that earth is warming are all “crackpots”. Helsing accepts the conclusions of the esteemed anti-global warming scientists such as Watts, Lord Moncton, Breitbart, Sen. Imhofe, Will, Hannity, Limbaugh, and dozens of other similar “esteemed” scientists. Professor Helsing has never commented, even when challenged by me, on the 12+ published results backing Mann’s “hockey stick”conclusion. Many of those studies used methods of obtaining proxy temperature data and analysis completely different than that of Mann’s.
      Yes there are a small number of real climate scientists that actually publish in scientific journals their results that indicate earth is warming for other reasons beside increases in CO2. Does Professor Helsing critique those results? No, they must be correct because thay fit the “conservative” view.

  • Anonymous

    Well, once again, we see RWN scientists out in full force, and this time it is not Teach telling us the truth about gas drilling and acquifer contamination, but a real scientist, Professor Helsing. Somehow, global warming got squeezed into the mix, but I’m sure what it has to do with anything.

  • Anonymous

    Energy is the new cotton. This will become (I believe it already has) another battle over states rights. The question is what will the Federal Government come up with to use has and excuses this time? Look for the commerce clause to come into play very soon. The states that can produce energy in any form should declare their energy independence from the federal government. The states need to re annex any land or ocean area within the 200 mile limit. The federal government should not have the right or the ability to decide how the people of the states should or should not exploit their natural resources. The federal government, federal law suit, or the EPA should not stop a wind farm in Texas or off the coast of California. The federal government, federal law suit, or the EPA should not stop a solar power plant in the middle of the desert. The federal government, federal law suit, or the EPA should not prevent a state from producing oil from sand or shale. The states could solve their budget problems and might be able to sale their energy to other states there by lowering energy cost of all. They might even be able to trade energy for other commodities between each other talk about oil for food program.

  • Anonymous

    Energy is the new cotton. This will become (I believe it already has) another battle over states rights. The question is what will the Federal Government come up with to use has and excuses this time? Look for the commerce clause to come into play very soon. The states that can produce energy in any form should declare their energy independence from the federal government. The states need to re annex any land or ocean area within the 200 mile limit. The federal government should not have the right or the ability to decide how the people of the states should or should not exploit their natural resources. The federal government, federal law suit, or the EPA should not stop a wind farm in Texas or off the coast of California. The federal government, federal law suit, or the EPA should not stop a solar power plant in the middle of the desert. The federal government, federal law suit, or the EPA should not prevent a state from producing oil from sand or shale. The states could solve their budget problems and might be able to sale their energy to other states there by lowering energy cost of all. They might even be able to trade energy for other commodities between each other talk about oil for food program.

  • Pingback: The EPA’s War on Energy Producer Range Resources | News Patriot

  • Pingback: Understanding Your Oil Pressure Sensor is a Vital Part of Keeping Your Car Healthy

  • Anonymous

    Time to sharpen the old guillotine. Our unelected ruling class is pushing just a bit too hard when people are just a bit too poor and desperate.

  • Anonymous

    Time to sharpen the old guillotine. Our unelected ruling class is pushing just a bit too hard when people are just a bit too poor and desperate.

  • Martin Hale

    …that the EPA’s conclusions are “sheer guesswork” based on “threadbare-thin” reasoning.

    Well, to be fair, it’s not the first time EPA has done that. Their work on CO₂ has a gas which you exhale a dozen times a minute or so declared a toxin which must be regulated. I’d say that’s sheer guesswork and threadbare-thin reasoning if there ever was any.

  • Martin Hale

    …that the EPA’s conclusions are “sheer guesswork” based on “threadbare-thin” reasoning.

    Well, to be fair, it’s not the first time EPA has done that. Their work on CO₂ has a gas which you exhale a dozen times a minute or so declared a toxin which must be regulated. I’d say that’s sheer guesswork and threadbare-thin reasoning if there ever was any.

  • Martin Hale

    …that the EPA’s conclusions are “sheer guesswork” based on “threadbare-thin” reasoning.

    Well, to be fair, it’s not the first time EPA has done that. Their work on CO₂ has a gas which you exhale a dozen times a minute or so declared a toxin which must be regulated. I’d say that’s sheer guesswork and threadbare-thin reasoning if there ever was any.

  • Martin Hale

    …that the EPA’s conclusions are “sheer guesswork” based on “threadbare-thin” reasoning.

    Well, to be fair, it’s not the first time EPA has done that. Their work on CO₂ has a gas which you exhale a dozen times a minute or so declared a toxin which must be regulated. I’d say that’s sheer guesswork and threadbare-thin reasoning if there ever was any.

  • Anonymous

    Here is the Texas Railroad Commissions policy on intergation from the 1890′ thru the 1960′s:

    “From the 1890s through the 1960s, the Texas Railroad Commission found it difficult to enforce fully Jim Crow segregation legislation. Because of the expense involved, Texas railroads often allowed wealthier Blacks to mix with whites, rather than provide separate cars, dining facilities, and even depots. In addition, West Texas authorities often refused to enforce Jim Crow laws because few African Americans resided there. In the 1940′s, the railroad commission’s enforcement of segregation laws began collapsing further, in part because of the great number of African American soldiers that were transported during World War II. The trains were integrated in the early 1960s.[4]”

    The quote is from Wikipedia. The commission is to be commended on fully integrating trains in Texas. Yes, I have great faith in the commission’s conclusions on gas in the water wells. I bet that that the well users fully agree.

  • Anonymous

    Here is the Texas Railroad Commissions policy on intergation from the 1890′ thru the 1960′s:

    “From the 1890s through the 1960s, the Texas Railroad Commission found it difficult to enforce fully Jim Crow segregation legislation. Because of the expense involved, Texas railroads often allowed wealthier Blacks to mix with whites, rather than provide separate cars, dining facilities, and even depots. In addition, West Texas authorities often refused to enforce Jim Crow laws because few African Americans resided there. In the 1940′s, the railroad commission’s enforcement of segregation laws began collapsing further, in part because of the great number of African American soldiers that were transported during World War II. The trains were integrated in the early 1960s.[4]”

    The quote is from Wikipedia. The commission is to be commended on fully integrating trains in Texas. Yes, I have great faith in the commission’s conclusions on gas in the water wells. I bet that that the well users fully agree.

    • StanW

      Why do you have an issue with this, Fiza?

      First, they were only implementing the Liberal Democrat plan of Jim Crow and segregration.
      And second, they didn’t to anything to stem the tide of illegal aliens for you to exploit and abuse.

      You should be THRILLED!

      • Anonymous

        “First, they were only implementing the Liberal Democrat plan of Jim Crow and segregration.”

        Liberal Democratic Plan? Are you mad? It was the liberal Democrats who passed the civil rights laws of 1964. The Republicans wisely recruted those southern conservative Democrats (Dixiecrats) who disagreed and fought against those “civil rights” laws. Now the children and grandchildren of those Dixiecrats, and those Dixiecrats still alive are now conservative Republicans. I bet you and your family fit that mold.

        • StanW

          Stop lying, you idiot.

          It was Liberals Democrats, like Robert Byrd, Al Gore Sr. And William Fulbright that filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights act.

          Most of the Dixiecrats went right back to their Liberal Democrat racist party when the Dixiecrats folded.

          History is NOT your firend!

    • StanW

      Why do you have an issue with this, Fiza?

      First, they were only implementing the Liberal Democrat plan of Jim Crow and segregration.
      And second, they didn’t to anything to stem the tide of illegal aliens for you to exploit and abuse.

      You should be THRILLED!

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info