Ted Cruz Was Right to Suggest Patrols of Muslim Enclaves

Remember when Ted Cruz posted to his Facebook page the now infamous statement regarding Muslim neighborhoods? “We need to empower law enforcement to patrol and secure Muslim neighborhoods before they become radicalized,” he wrote on the 22nd of March.
Brent Smith
Later the same day, due to backlash from the spineless set on the left and right, the Cruz campaign clarified his position. It read: “We know what is happening with these isolated Muslim neighborhoods inEurope. If we want to prevent it from happening here, it is going to require an empowered, visible law enforcement presence that will both identify problem spots and partner with non-radical Americans who want to protect their homes.”
Personally I don’t think there was any need for further clarity, but we who are more informed about everything Islam would of course need no explanation. This was not for us, nor was it for the denialist left or the spineless right who fear upsetting everyone and anyone by speaking the truth. This post was no doubt intended for the less informed “security” voter.
There is nothing that can be done for the left’s Islamist deniers. In the face of all evidence, they still cannot even be convinced that there are radical Muslim “No-Go Zones” in Europe, much less in the United States.
The ultra-left website Vox.com, boldly stated that, “The ‘no-go zones’ are a myth in Europe. And the specter of them coming to America, where Muslims are barely clustered in enough proximity for ‘Muslim neighborhoods’ to even exist, is even less credible.”
I’m afraid Vox and rest of the left is wrong, as they are regarding almost everything they spew. The less informed “security” voter are the ones who need to be told that there is no “specter” of Muslim “no-go zones” coming to America, for they are already here and have been so, some for decades.
The Pakistani “Muslims of the Americas” have between 15 and 22 isolated “Islamic Villages” throughout the United States, which are Sharia-only enclaves, some heavily armed and all are hostile to the American way of life and where severe beatings of young boys occur “for minor infractions of sharia law, such as watching an American children’s show without approval.”
In fact “Islamic villages” have been established, beginning in 1980, as “part of a jihad against a Satanic-Jewish-Communist conspiracy that puppeteers the U.S. government.”
These villages are relatively small enclaves in remote regions of the country, yet Vox refuses to also acknowledge cities like Dearborn, MI., which is “home to just under 100,000 people. Yet about 40-45 percent of the 100,000 are Muslim. In 2013, a leaked government document revealed that more people from Dearborn were on the federal terrorist watch list than from any other city except New York, and NYC has a population of well over 8 million.
Still, the left and many on the right argue the semantics of calling densely populated, non-assimilated Muslim neighborhoods who insist on Sharia in lieu of American law, “No-Go Zones.” I suppose technically one can’t yet classify places like Dearborn as such, being that police and emergency personnel can still venture in. But as more Muslims stream into our country and settle in these already concentrated areas, the word-games will become inconsequential. 
I suppose for now we can use the term the French use for their “No-Go Zones,” which is “Sensitive Urban Zones.” Will that make everyone feel better and safer?
Also see,

Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!