When He Started Visiting A Dominatrix, He Never Thought She Would Do This

When He Started Visiting A Dominatrix, He Never Thought She Would Do This

A man who engaged the services of a dominatrix for a prolonged period of time has been outed by the same dominatrix and his life remains in shambles. Though his sexual fetishes are bizarre to many, by all accounts, the activities were between consenting adults. Still, Jonathon White has had his life turned upside down and the dominatrix claims that she was merely trying to “warn” the people in his life.

CFHJ56 Mistress

A dominatrix outed a supercar salesman’s deviant sexual lifestyle to his family because she wanted to warn them about his behaviour, a court heard.

Sarah Smith, 43, said she wanted to tell ‘the world’ about married Jonathan White, 47, after he paid her to be his ‘dominating mistress’.

Trending: The 15 Best Conservative News Sites On The Internet

Together they engaged in a casual relationship using his sex-toy filled purple BDSM playroom in his home in Trowbridge, Wiltshire, for their sex games.

Things turned sour a few months later when Mr White ended the relationship in November 2013.

Smith, who works as a carer during the day, allegedly flew into a rage, causing £6,800 worth of damage to his black Nissan 370 sports car by scratching the word ‘GIMP’ into the side panels, slashing all four tyres, the soft-top roof and shattering the windscreen, Salisbury Crown Court heard.

She then bombarded him with emails and text messages over a nine-month period in alleged acts of stalking and harassment – forcing Mr White to move jobs 150 miles away from his home to Peterborough, the court heard.

Smith today said the pair rekindled their relationship between February and May 2014, and she visited Mr White’s home every weekend because she believed he loved her and wanted to marry her.

But when she found emails and ‘distressing adult sites’ where Mr White ‘advertised himself as a prostitute’, an ‘angry and irrational’ Smith began putting together a ‘character assassination’ of him.

She told his family, including ex-wife of 15-years Amanda, his brother, nephew and niece over Facebook, over fears he ‘might hurt somebody’.

Smith, of Bristol, then sent nine brown envelopes to his new bosses at Radical Sportscars with photos of him tied to a cross, surrounded by sex toys and whips, wearing a female corset, trousers and eye mask.

Another featuring Mr White showed him engaging in a ‘Tug of War’ – where his penis was tied to someone else’s nipple by a piece of string.

It pushed Mr White to the verge of a nervous breakdown and, following his suspension from work, he went to the police and begged: ‘Please help me.’

Simon Edwards, prosecuting, said they were ‘acts of malice’ and ‘intrusions into his privacy’.

He said: ‘It was the ultimate humiliation, and not one he was meant to enjoy. Like it or loathe it, there is nothing illegal about BDSM. It’s not against the law, providing the participants act within the constraints of the law. We are at liberty to do whatever we get kicks from in the privacy of our homes.’

The court heard Smith has convictions from the early 1990s for loitering, when she said she worked as a prostitute after being ‘groomed’ into doing so.

She described how a friend who was working in BDSM helped her set up a profile online because it was ‘better than the alternative of prostitution’.

Mr White was her first BDSM customer, and Smith said she was hired to fill the void in a three way BDSM relationship Mr White had with some friends.

Smith said she was ‘naive’ as she she believed all she would have to do was ‘flog a man’.

Smith denies a count of stalking involving serious alarm, harassment or distress between November 1 2014 and July 31 2014.

Undoubtedly, many find White’s choices to be bizarre and off-putting. Still, through all the media accounts of this strange incident, few have taken note of a simple fact: as strange and even perverse as these activities may appear, they were private encounters between consenting adults.

To make such matters public as a means of retribution or out of malice is unquestionably inappropriate and cruel.

Hopefully, the court will find similarly.

Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!